KILZ FILLZ Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 Is this argument in two threads? Cmon ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abstract Rationality Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 DOGS ARE DESCENDANTS OF WOLFES. HUMANS ARE DESCENDANTS OF APES. THEY SHARE A RELATION, BUT ARE NOT EXACTLY THE SAME. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nsmbfan Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 i think all of you motherfuckers are decendants of mongoloids. the truth is, facts mean nothing when you argue with an idiot. the truth is, scientific nomenclature is an imperfect science, changing with new discoveries. the truth is, i believe DAO is correct on damn near every page, you internerds are just mad. BUT DOGS COME FROM WHALES? HAVE WE LOST SIGHT OF THE ORIGINAL ARGUMENT? THIS IS IT, NOT WOLF VS DOG VS HORSE VS ZEBRA. WHO CARES, THIS NIGGA SAID DOGS CAME FROM WHALES!!! Continue... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dirtydoses Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 i saw a dog that looked like a whale once actually it was a whale that looked like a dog doesn't matter anyways, basically the same thing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwampFightOner Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 ^Says the nigga who thinks that the Black Panthers were on some "kill whitey" shit, and even confuses them with some fake ass "black panthers" who have absolutely nothing to do with the real black panthers. I like how in your recollection of the thread I was arguing about something that you had no clue about when it was VERY CLEAR to everyone else that we were talking about the NBPP party. If you didn't know that we were discussing the NBPP, how exactly did you end up posting links to their YouTube videos, AND to their official website? You certainly don't get there googling Black panther Party, so how did you do it? And not only that, but THEN you specifically defended the NBPP AND their leader...only after you concluded that your argument was a complete and epic fail did you all of a sudden "realize" what we were talking about Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abstract Rationality Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 SO PANTHERS CAME FROM BLACK WHALES? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LosingMyMind Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 I think this belongs in here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwampFightOner Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 SO PANTHERS CAME FROM BLACK WHALES? No, they're the same fucking animal. Every 10 month old child and nuclear physicist knows this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abstract Rationality Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 No, they're the same fucking animal. Every 10 month old child and nuclear physicist knows this MY FRIEND, you need some help. No such thing as a 10 month old nuclear physicist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwampFightOner Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 ONCE AGAIN, to try and break it down for DAO Horses and zebra are both members of the family Equidae. That family is sometimes called "the horse family", because it contains horses and all other RELATED animals, such as zebras, donkeys, etc. The only reason it is sometimes called "the horse family", is because most people are too stupid to understand what equidae is, and therefore another name makes it easier for such retards to try and grasp the concepts of taxonomy. It does not mean that every animal in that family is a horse, otherwise there would be no reason for them to be labeled seperately in the first place. How the fuck can you claim that a horse and a donkey (for example) are the same animal, when they don't even have the same number of chromosomes? Most of that argument can also be applied to the family canidae/dogs/wolves to explain why they aren't the same animal Basically, DAO is pulling some serious first grade fail right now You never responded to any of this, except to quote the words "horse family" and take it as a win, when the next few sentences explain why it isn't Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grim540 Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 So if a cross between a horse and a donkey is a mule, why do we call it a mule. Because obviously a cross between a horse(horse) and a donkey(horse) is a mule (horse). If they are all horses why do we bother calling it a mule? hmmmm..... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kJJA1vvMc4I Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SystemFailure Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 After cherrypicking through this thread I am still stunned as to why I did not follow it from its outrageously promising beginning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knee Grow Please Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 You never responded to any of this, except to quote the words "horse family" and take it as a win, when the next few sentences explain why it isn't this.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abstract Rationality Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 HORSES ARE NOT DOGS, DOGS ARENT MULES, MULES ARENT WOLVES, EAGLES ARE NOT WHALES Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spitfire15 Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 I think this belongs in here. YOU CAN CLEARLY SEE THE FLIPPERS YOU FUCKING FAGGOT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maskface Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 see. Dogs ARE detectives Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LexDiamonds Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 i think all of you motherfuckers are decendants of mongoloids. the truth is, facts mean nothing when you argue with an idiot. the truth is, scientific nomenclature is an imperfect science, changing with new discoveries. the truth is, i believe DAO is correct on damn near every page, you internerds are just mad. BUT DOGS COME FROM WHALES? HAVE WE LOST SIGHT OF THE ORIGINAL ARGUMENT? THIS IS IT, NOT WOLF VS DOG VS HORSE VS ZEBRA. WHO CARES, THIS NIGGA SAID DOGS CAME FROM WHALES!!! Continue... I gotta bring this over here in response to this. :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of Hank Williams Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tavaruawon Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spicoli Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
awkward eye Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 Where do we stand on Unicorns? Can I get some clarification? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LosingMyMind Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 Narwhals that started to graze on the beach obviously. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LEVEL 75 PALADIN Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 ^^^^ Seriously... Didn't you go to middleschool? Every 3 year old knows this. You're a fucking moron. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XJONATHONX Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 I'm in complete disbelief. I cant believe this thread got this far Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spitfire15 Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 Common knowledge you fucking idiot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheoHuxtable.. Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 . the truth is, i believe DAO is correct on damn near every page No, he hasn't been. He said whales came from dogs. Whales did evolve from a 4-legged mammal, it just wasn't a dog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
compton red Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LexDiamonds Posted September 1, 2009 Share Posted September 1, 2009 That's a horrible painting of Mike Vick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ILOTSMYBRAIN Posted September 1, 2009 Share Posted September 1, 2009 The Mad and 4ever pieces do look dope though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
compton red Posted September 1, 2009 Share Posted September 1, 2009 That's a horrible painting of Mike Vick. perhaps. but in terms of a painting of mike vick choking out a dog in a cowboys uni? that's a whole other animal. pun intended. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.