1. Welcome to the 12ozProphet Forum...
    You are currently logged out and viewing our forum as a guest which only allows limited access to our discussions, photos and other forum features. If you are a 12ozProphet Member please login to get the full experience.

    If you are not a 12ozProphet Member, please take a moment to register to gain full access to our website and all of its features. As a 12ozProphet Member you will be able to post comments, start discussions, communicate privately with other members and access members-only content. Registration is fast, simple and free, so join today and be a part of the largest and longest running Graffiti, Art, Style & Culture forum online.

    Please note, if you are a 12ozProphet Member and are locked out of your account, you can recover your account using the 'lost password' link in the login form. If you no longer have access to the email you registered with, please email us at info@12ozprophet.com and we'll help you recover your account. Welcome to the 12ozProphet Forum (and don't forget to follow @12ozprophet in Instagram)!

MOORE VS. O'REILLY

Discussion in 'Channel Zero' started by BROWNer, Jul 27, 2004.

  1. BROWNer

    BROWNer Guest

    MOORE VS. O'REILLY

    Discussion started by BROWNer - Jul 27, 2004

    XXXXX DRUDGE REPORT XXXXX
    MICHAEL MOORE/O'REILLY SHOWDOWN AT CONVENTION
    Tue Jul 27 2004 16:51:50 ET

    http://www.drudgereport.com/dnc7.jpg'>

    FOX NEWS is planning to air a redhot interview between Bill O'Reilly and boxoffice sensation Michael Moore on Tuesday.
    The DRUDGE REPORT has obtained an embargoed transcript of the session:


    Moore: That’s fair, we’ll just stick to the issues
    O’Reilly: The issues… alright good, now, one of the issues is you because you’ve been calling Bush a liar on weapons of mass destruction, the senate intelligence committee, Lord Butler’s investigation in Britain, and now the 911 Commission have all come out and said there was no lying on the part of President Bush._ Plus, Gladimir Putin has said his intelligence told Bush there were weapons of mass destruction._ Wanna apologize to the president now or later?
    M: He didn’t tell the truth, he said there were weapons of mass destruction.
    O: Yeah, but he didn’t lie, he was misinformed by - all of those investigations come to the same conclusion, that’s not a lie.
    M: uh huh, so in other words if I told you right now that nothing was going on down here on the stage…
    O: That would be a lie because we could see that wasn’t the truth
    M: Well, I’d have to turn around to see it, and then I would realize, oh, Bill, I just told you something that wasn’t true… actually it’s president Bush that needs to apologize to the nation for telling an entire country that there were weapons of mass destruction, that they had evidence of this, and that there was some sort of connection between Saddam Hussein and September 11th, and he used that as a –
    O: Ok, He never said that, but back to the other thing, if you, if Michael Moore is president –
    M: I thought you said you saw the movie, I show all that in the movie
    O: Which may happen if Hollywood, yeah, OK, fine –
    M: But that was your question –
    O: Just the issues._ You’ve got three separate investigations plus the president of Russia all saying… British intelligence, US intelligence, Russian intelligence, told the president there were weapons of mass destruction, you say, “he lied.”_ This is not a lie if you believe it to be true, now he may have made a mistake, which is obvious –
    M: Well, that’s almost pathological – I mean, many criminals believe what they say is true, they could pass a lie detector test –
    O: Alright, now you’re dancing around a question –
    M: No I’m not, there’s no dancing
    O: He didn’t lie
    M: He said something that wasn’t true
    O: Based upon bad information given to him by legitimate sources
    M: Now you know that they went to the CIA, Cheney went to the CIA, they wanted that information, they wouldn’t listen to anybody
    O: They wouldn’t go by Russian intelligence and Blair’s intelligence too
    M: His own people told him, I mean he went to Richard Clarke the day after September 11th and said “What you got on Iraq?” and Richard Clarke’s going “Oh well this wasn’t Iraq that did this sir, this was Al Qaeda.”
    O: You’re diverting the issue…did you read Woodward’s book?
    M: No, I haven’t read his book.
    O: Woodward’s a good reporter, right?_ Good guy, you know who he is right?
    M: I know who he is.
    O: Ok, he says in his book George Tenet looked the president in the eye, like how I am looking you in the eye right now and said “President, weapons of mass destruction are a quote, end quote, “slam dunk” if you’re the president, you ignore all that?
    M: Yeah, I would say that the CIA had done a pretty poor job.
    O: I agree._ The lieutenant was fired.
    M: Yeah, but not before they took us to war based on his intelligence._ This is a man who ran the CIA, a CIA that was so poorly organized and run that it wouldn’t communicate with the FBI before September 11th and as a result in part we didn’t have a very good intelligence system set up before September 11th
    O: Nobody disputes that
    M: Ok, so he screws up September 11th._ Why would you then listen to him, he says this is a “slam dunk” and your going to go to war.
    O: You’ve got MI-6 and Russian intelligence because they’re all saying the same thing that’s why._ You’re not going to apologize to Bush, you are going to continue to call him a liar.
    M: Oh, he lied to the nation, Bill, I can’t think of a worse thing to do for a president to lie to a country to take them to war, I mean, I don’t know a worse –
    O: It wasn’t a lie
    M: He did not tell the truth, what do you call that?
    O: I call that bad information, acting on bad information – not a lie
    M: A seven year old can get away with that –
    O: Alright, your turn to ask me a question—
    M: ‘Mom and Dad it was just bad information’—
    O: I’m not going to get you to admit it wasn’t a lie, go ahead
    M: It was a lie, and now, which leads us to my question
    O: OK
    M: Over 900 of our brave soldiers are dead._ What do you say to their parents?_
    O: What do I say to their parents?_ I say what every patriotic American would say. We are proud of your sons and daughters._ They answered the call that their country gave them._ We respect them and we feel terrible that they were killed.
    M: And, but what were they killed for?
    O: They were removing a brutal dictator who himself killed hundreds of thousands of people
    M: Um, but that was not the reason that was given to them to go to war, to remove a brutal dictator
    O: Well we’re back to the weapons of mass destruction
    M: But that was the reason
    O: The weapons of mass destruction
    M: That we were told we were under some sort of imminent threat
    O: That’s right
    M: And there was no threat, was there?
    O: It was a mistake
    M: Oh, just a mistake, and that’s what you tell all the parents with a deceased child, “We’re sorry.”_ I don’t think that is good enough.
    O: I don’t think its good enough either for those parents
    M: So we agree on that
    O: but that is the historical nature of what happened
    M: Bill, if I made a mistake and I said something or did something as a result of my mistake but it resulted in the death of your child, how would you feel towards me?
    O: It depends on whether the mistake was unintentional
    M: No, not intentional, it was a mistake
    O: Then if it was an unintentional mistake I cannot hold you morally responsible for that
    M: Really, I’m driving down the road and I hit your child and your child is dead
    O: If it were unintentional and you weren’t impaired or anything like that
    M: So that’s all it is, if it was alcohol, even though it was a mistake – how would you feel towards me
    O: Ok, now we are wandering
    M: No, but my point is –
    O: I saw what your point is and I answered your question
    M: But why?_ What did they die for?
    O: They died to remove a brutal dictator who had killed hundreds of thousands of people –
    M: No, that was not the reason –
    O: That’s what they died for
    M: -they were given –
    O: The weapons of mass destruction was a mistake
    M: Well there were 30 other brutal dictators in this world –
    O:_ Alright, I’ve got anther question—
    M: Would you sacrifice—just finish on this._ Would you sacrifice your child to remove one of the other 30 brutal dictators on this planet?
    O: Depends what the circumstances were.
    M: You would sacrifice your child?
    O: I would sacrifice myself—I’m not talking for any children—to remove the Taliban. Would you?
    M: Uh huh.
    O: Would you? That’s my next question. Would you sacrifice yourself to remove the Taliban?
    M: I would be willing to sacrifice my life to track down the people that killed 3,000 people on our soil.
    O: Al Qeada was given refuge by the Taliban.
    M: But we didn’t go after them—did we?
    O: We removed the Taliban and killed three quarters of Al Qeada.
    M: That’s why the Taliban are still killing our soldiers there.
    O: OK, well look you cant kill everybody. You wouldn’t have invaded Afghanistan—you wouldn’t have invaded Afghanistan, would you?
    M: No, I would have gone after the man that killed 3,000 people.
    O: How?
    M: As Richard Clarke says, our special forces were prohibited for two months from going to the area that we believed Osama was—
    O: Why was that?
    M: That’s my question.
    O: Because Pakistan didn’t want its territory of sovereignty violated.
    M: Not his was in Afghanistan, on the border, we didn’t go there. He got a two month head start.
    O: Alright, you would not have removed the Taliban. You would not have removed that government?
    M: No, unless it is a threat to us.
    O: Any government? Hitler, in Germany, not a threat to us the beginning but over there executing people all day long—you would have let him go?
    M: That’s not true. Hitler with Japan, attacked the United States.
    O: Before—from 33-until 41 he wasn’t an imminent threat to the United States.
    M: There’s a lot of things we should have done.
    O: You wouldn’t have removed him.
    M: I wouldn’t have even allowed him to come to power.
    O: That was a preemption from Michael Moore—you would have invaded.
    M: If we’d done our job, you want to get into to talking about what happened before WWI, woah, I’m trying to stop this war right now.
    O: I know you are but—
    M: Are you against that? Stopping this war?
    O: No we cannot leave Iraq right now, we have to—
    M: So you would sacrifice your child to secure Fallujah? I want to hear you say that.
    O: I would sacrifice myself—
    M: Your child—Its Bush sending the children there.
    O: I would sacrifice myself.
    M: You and I don’t go to war, because we’re too old—
    O: Because if we back down, there will be more deaths and you know it.
    M: Say ‘I Bill O’Reilly would sacrifice my child to secure Fallujah’
    O: I’m not going to say what you say, you’re a, that’s ridiculous
    M: You don’t believe that. Why should Bush sacrifice the children of people across America for this?
    O: Look it’s a worldwide terrorism—I know that escapes you—
    M: Wait a minute, terrorism? Iraq?
    O: Yes. There are terrorist in Iraq.
    M: Oh really? So Iraq now is responsible for the terrorism here?
    O: Iraq aided terrorist—don’t you know anything about any of that?
    M: So you’re saying Iraq is responsible for what?
    O: I’m saying that Saddam Hussein aided all day long.
    M: You’re not going to get me to defend Saddam Hussein.
    O: I’m not? You’re his biggest defender in the media.
    M: Now come on.
    O: Look, if you were running he would still be sitting there.
    M: How do you know that?
    O: If you were running the country, he’d still be sitting there.
    M: How do you know that?
    O: You wouldn’t have removed him.
    M: Look let me tell you something in the 1990s look at all the brutal dictators that were removed. Things were done, you take any of a number of countries whether its Eastern Europe, the people rose up. South Africa the whole world boycotted---
    O: When Reagan was building up the arms, you were against that.
    M: And the dictators were gone. Building up the arms did not cause the fall of Eastern Europe.
    O: Of course it did, it bankrupted the Soviet Union and then it collapsed.
    M: The people rose up.
    O: why? Because they went bankrupt.
    M: the same way we did in our country, the way we had our revolution. People rose up—
    O: Alright alright.
    M:--that’s how you, let me ask you this question.
    O: One more.
    M: How do you deliver democracy to a country? You don’t do it down the barrel of a gun. That’s not how you deliver it.
    O: You give the people some kind of self-determination, which they never would have had under Saddam—
    M: Why didn’t they rise up?
    O: Because they couldn’t, it was a Gestapo-led place where they got their heads cut off—
    M: well that’s true in many countries throughout the world__
    O: It is, it’s a shame—
    M:--and you know what people have done, they’ve risen up._ You can do it in a number of ways . You can do it our way through a violent revolution, which we won, the French did it that way. You can do it by boycotting South Africa, they overthrew the dictator there. There’s many ways—
    O: I’m glad we’ve had this discussion because it just shows you that I see the world my way, you see the world your way, alright—and the audience is watching us here and they can decide who is right and who is wrong and that’s the fair way to do it. Right?
    M: Right, I would not sacrifice my child to secure Fallujah and you would?
    O: I would sacrifice myself.
    M: You wouldn’t send another child, another parents child to Fallujah, would you? You would sacrifice your life to secure Fallujah?
    O: I would.
    M: Can we sign him up? Can we sign him up right now?
    O: That’s right.
    M: Where’s the recruiter?
    O: You’d love to get rid of me.
    M: No I don’t want—I want you to live. I want you to live.
    O: I appreciate that. Michael Moore everybody. There he is…

    END
     
  2. why write?

    why write? 12oz Veteran Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2003
    Messages:
    5,859

    why write? - Replied Jul 27, 2004

    sum it up! :crazy:
     
    why write? - Rank: 12oz Veteran Member - Messages:
    5,859
    - Joined:
    Oct 19, 2003
  3. T=E=A=S=E

    T=E=A=S=E 12oz Elite Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2004
    Messages:
    3,271

    T=E=A=S=E - Replied Jul 27, 2004

    :eek:
     
    T=E=A=S=E - Rank: 12oz Elite Member - Messages:
    3,271
    - Joined:
    Mar 27, 2004
  4. Huey Newton

    Huey Newton New Jack

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2004
    Messages:
    33

    Huey Newton - Replied Jul 27, 2004

    That's great stuff. When you have the media heads of the far left and far right, it's doomed to be a battle.
     
    Huey Newton - Rank: New Jack - Messages:
    33
    - Joined:
    Jul 27, 2004
  5. the_gooch

    the_gooch 12oz Loyalist

    Joined:
    May 15, 2002
    Messages:
    11,566

    the_gooch - Replied Jul 27, 2004

    that was great!

    o'reilly is such a cunt!
     
    the_gooch - Rank: 12oz Loyalist - Messages:
    11,566
    - Joined:
    May 15, 2002
  6. High Priest

    High Priest 12oz Elite Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2002
    Messages:
    4,928

    High Priest - Replied Jul 27, 2004

    hahah good shit.
     
    High Priest - Rank: 12oz Elite Member - Messages:
    4,928
    - Joined:
    Jan 1, 2002
  7. Jimmy Jump

    Jimmy Jump 12oz Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2004
    Messages:
    665

    Jimmy Jump - Replied Jul 27, 2004

    nice find.. i wanna see Moore on OReilly's show..
     
    Jimmy Jump - Rank: 12oz Member - Messages:
    665
    - Joined:
    Jun 8, 2004
  8. StarzAbove

    StarzAbove 12oz Veteran Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2003
    Messages:
    7,132

    StarzAbove - Replied Jul 27, 2004

    This is going to be a good one.
     
    StarzAbove - Rank: 12oz Veteran Member - Messages:
    7,132
    - Joined:
    Jul 15, 2003
  9. heavyLox

    heavyLox 12oz Veteran Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2002
    Messages:
    7,196

    heavyLox - Replied Jul 27, 2004

    i cannot count the number of ways i hate BILL O'fuckly. He is such a cock sucker.
     
    heavyLox - Rank: 12oz Veteran Member - Messages:
    7,196
    - Joined:
    Feb 2, 2002
  10. imported_El Mamerro - Replied Jul 27, 2004

    Um... not a very good show from either of the two, but it's not surprising considering their gasbag tendencies. What is surprising though, is that it seems to me O'Reilly came out on top, which is downright pathetic.
     
  11. crave

    crave 12oz Veteran Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2002
    Messages:
    6,728

    crave - Replied Jul 27, 2004

    true indeed.
     
    crave - Rank: 12oz Veteran Member - Messages:
    6,728
    - Joined:
    Jan 20, 2002
  12. KYU

    KYU 12oz Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2004
    Messages:
    437

    KYU - Replied Jul 27, 2004

    no it was not "great", it was them playing word semantics. im glad they rehashed the same bullshit, cuz i dunno what i'd do if they hadn't
     
    KYU - Rank: 12oz Member - Messages:
    437
    - Joined:
    Feb 20, 2004
  13. the_gooch

    the_gooch 12oz Loyalist

    Joined:
    May 15, 2002
    Messages:
    11,566

    the_gooch - Replied Jul 27, 2004

    no it was great, and indeed they played the back and forth game, but at least moore was able to call o'riley out there and create a dialog. i hope to see moore actually appear on the factor and debate that cunt opposed to a quick 1, 2 in the street.
     
    the_gooch - Rank: 12oz Loyalist - Messages:
    11,566
    - Joined:
    May 15, 2002
  14. iloveboxcars

    iloveboxcars 12oz Royalty

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2002
    Messages:
    20,499

    iloveboxcars - Replied Jul 27, 2004

    There are times where I wish I had cable.
     
    iloveboxcars - Rank: 12oz Royalty - Messages:
    20,499
    - Joined:
    Jul 29, 2002
  15. fermentor666

    fermentor666 12oz Veteran Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2003
    Messages:
    8,152

    fermentor666 - Replied Jul 27, 2004

    Here we go round the mulberry bush, the mulberry bush, the mulberry bush....
     
    fermentor666 - Rank: 12oz Veteran Member - Messages:
    8,152
    - Joined:
    Sep 27, 2003