Mercer Posted October 18, 2020 Author Share Posted October 18, 2020 lol, rules for thee... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mercer Posted November 1, 2020 Author Share Posted November 1, 2020 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mercer Posted November 1, 2020 Author Share Posted November 1, 2020 Police: We're fighting crime Also Police: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ndv Posted November 6, 2020 Share Posted November 6, 2020 ^^ seriously, there's a real division in the department for illegal deforrestation? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KILZ FILLZ Posted November 6, 2020 Share Posted November 6, 2020 2 hours ago, ndv said: ^^ seriously, there's a real division in the department for illegal deforrestation? Likely to keep people from transporting firewood between regions. https://www.kpbs.org/news/2012/nov/29/invasive-beetle-devouring-san-diegos-oak-trees/ 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KILZ FILLZ Posted November 11, 2020 Share Posted November 11, 2020 https://www.opb.org/article/2020/10/12/measure-26-217-portland-oregon-police-oversight/ What it does If approved by voters, the measure will amend the city charter to establish an independent police oversight board with members approved by the City Council. Members would wield a significant amount of power. The board would have the authority to discipline and fire police officers — a power currently reserved for the police commissioner. They would have a guaranteed budget of no less than 5% of the police bureau’s budget, which this fiscal year would have been $11 million. That’s compared to the current Independent Police Review board’s $2.8 million budget. And they would function independently of any government official. The new oversight board would have the power to investigate all deaths in custody, uses of deadly force, complaints of force causing injury, discrimination against protected classes and constitutional rights violations. The board would also be tasked with making recommendations on police policy and directives that the City Council — and not the police bureau — would get the final say on implementing. What types of policy the independent board could recommend has not been defined. The board would also have the power to subpoena documents and compel statements from police officers during investigations. The measure says board members should have diverse backgrounds, including lived experience with systemic racism, mental illness and addiction. It specifically prohibits current or former police officers — or anyone in their immediate families — from serving on the board. The proposed changes would mean the end of the Independent Police Review, a city agency that investigates complaints made against police. Many have criticized the agency for lacking the power to hold police accountable. Another major critique of the current system is that Independent Police Review investigations are often confidential. Disciplinary decisions are left up to the police chief and police commissioner — a post currently filled by Mayor Ted Wheeler. Those decisions can be overturned by an arbitrator if the police union appeals. State law shields most of these investigations into police misconduct from being disclosed to the public. So while Hardesty has promised a more effective and transparent form of oversight than what the Independent Police Review offers, it will require changes to state law and within the union contract to become a reality. ••• https://www.opb.org/article/2020/11/06/portland-police-oversight-union-challenge/ In the grievance, which was sent to Deputy Police Chief Chris Davis by newly elected PPA president Brian Hunzeker, the officer’s union is requesting the city cease implementing changes to oversight and discipline without first coming to an agreement. Voters approved the measure following months of racial justice protests in the city where police have used significant force to break up demonstrations. Many complaints about officer conduct at those protests are currently under review. In a statement Thursday night, Portland Mayor Ted Wheeler, who narrowly won a second term in office this week, said the measure reflects the will of the people. “The City will actively defend the voters' decision and comply with the Charter Amendment to meet any bargaining obligations required by law,” Wheeler said. Commissioner Jo Ann Hardesty, who fought to get the measure on the ballot, acknowledged that to fully realize her goal of transparent and effective police oversight, state laws and the union contract will both have to be changed. “We must change the arbitration rules in Salem so that it will allow for the community oversight board’s decisions to be final,” Hardesty said, hours after the measure passed. “It puts us in an excellent position on Jan. 17 when we start negotiating the new Portland Police Association contract.” ••• police union will never agree to terms to allow civilian oversight. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KILZ FILLZ Posted November 11, 2020 Share Posted November 11, 2020 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KILZ FILLZ Posted November 28, 2020 Share Posted November 28, 2020 https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/nov/27/one-year-old-boy-shot-dead-during-alleged-kidnapping-in-canada cops shot a baby instead of putting themselves in harms way Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mercer Posted November 29, 2020 Author Share Posted November 29, 2020 Maybe if that baby followed their commands he wouldn't have put himself in that situation. All you have to do is obey the law people, it's not rocket science. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr.yuck Posted November 29, 2020 Share Posted November 29, 2020 What ever we do, lets not jump to any conclusions about these officers conduct. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark_Knight Posted November 29, 2020 Share Posted November 29, 2020 I’d like to see that baby’s criminal record before I make any assumptions 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mercer Posted November 29, 2020 Author Share Posted November 29, 2020 Well we can put this investigation to rest now. I've done some digging, and guess who's family pet was caught up in a catnip raid 4 years ago, and is still on probation for it now? I swear these criminals must think we're stupid or something. Way I see it, those officers had no other choice. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark_Knight Posted November 30, 2020 Share Posted November 30, 2020 Looks like they successfully rode the #ThinBlueLine. #Justified Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KILZ FILLZ Posted December 1, 2020 Share Posted December 1, 2020 Si se puede 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KILZ FILLZ Posted December 3, 2020 Share Posted December 3, 2020 https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/michel-bastarache-rcmp-sexual-assault-1.5825438?__vfz=medium%3Dsharebar "Like the Catholic Church, they just move them to another parish. I have a list [of RCMP officers] who have been found guilty up to 15 times. Those people have been promoted." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KILZ FILLZ Posted December 8, 2020 Share Posted December 8, 2020 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mercer Posted December 17, 2020 Author Share Posted December 17, 2020 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mercer Posted December 24, 2020 Author Share Posted December 24, 2020 Kid_asks_a_Officer_for_a_selfie-1tn6xfvd4z661.mp4 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mercer Posted January 21, 2021 Author Share Posted January 21, 2021 Damn, look how proud these pussies are flexing a fucking work tool. Imagine being so deep in your state religion you'd kidnap and punish somebody for owning a fucking leatherman wave, then virtue signal like you've done everyone a huge favor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abrasivesaint Posted January 21, 2021 Share Posted January 21, 2021 They British? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KILZ FILLZ Posted January 21, 2021 Share Posted January 21, 2021 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hua Guofang Posted January 24, 2021 Share Posted January 24, 2021 Saw these and thought of you wankers. Enjoy: Fucking man-crush on this berserker. Dude has balls like supernovas. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hua Guofang Posted January 24, 2021 Share Posted January 24, 2021 Commitment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elena Delle Donne Posted January 24, 2021 Share Posted January 24, 2021 can't reform this Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark_Knight Posted January 24, 2021 Share Posted January 24, 2021 Text book execution. Pun intended. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KILZ FILLZ Posted January 24, 2021 Share Posted January 24, 2021 A few bad apples Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KILZ FILLZ Posted January 24, 2021 Share Posted January 24, 2021 https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/man-jailed-allegedly-posting-photo-two-men-urinating-deputy-s-n1255444 "The First Amendment clearly and unmistakably protects this man’s right to post an offensive photo about a police officer," he said. "The only people who broke the law here were the police officers and TBI agents who participated in this flagrantly unconstitutional arrest." "I am riled up about the government imprisoning someone for disrespecting them," he said. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ndv Posted January 24, 2021 Share Posted January 24, 2021 Its kinda confusing, because the article states "doctored". So is that as in photoshopped? If so I can see how that would be harassment. Now if whatever "doctored" is supposed to mean, but if the photo is real, then as a juror, I would see he distribution as two rights. First and for most, archived for historical reasons, and second, the first amendment. Why I chose to historical archive ment before 1st amendment, is because in the defense historical archivement because this way it can be spun and explained in many many ways relating to freedom of the press, not only the freedom of expression which truly should be the first amd foremost but at this time here in the states amendments have become increasingly politically charged in triggering a way of thought, amendments easily cause anxiety. And in any case on any side of the law prosecutorial or defensive at a jury trial the first and last thing I would want to do is cause any juror stress or anxiety which can lead to negative outcomes for multiple reasons. Anyhow, I think the arrest is BS. Sounds like a case of retaliation to what was posted. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr.yuck Posted January 27, 2021 Share Posted January 27, 2021 On 1/24/2021 at 4:33 PM, KILZ FILLZ said: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/man-jailed-allegedly-posting-photo-two-men-urinating-deputy-s-n1255444 "The First Amendment clearly and unmistakably protects this man’s right to post an offensive photo about a police officer," he said. "The only people who broke the law here were the police officers and TBI agents who participated in this flagrantly unconstitutional arrest." "I am riled up about the government imprisoning someone for disrespecting them," he said. I got arrested in Dickson TN 19 years ago. I was drunk driving, stealing gas, and recklessly endangering a child at the time. The police were talking mad shit to me and one of them said something about how my parents raised me wrong. I looked him dead in his eyes and told him to shut his mouth and that he didnt know my parents and how brave it was for him to trash people that werent there to defend themselves. He then apologized to me for bringing my parents into it. Lol. I hope it was him that got smoked. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abrasivesaint Posted February 12, 2021 Share Posted February 12, 2021 https://nypost.com/2021/02/11/charges-dismissed-against-buffalo-cops-who-shoved-elderly-protester/?utm_source=NYPTwitter&utm_medium=SocialFlow&utm_campaign=SocialFlow 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.