angelofdeath Posted August 28, 2007 Share Posted August 28, 2007 everyone could be somewhat happy with the results if we followed the constitution and the federal government followed itto the tee. then DC would be so small and insignificant and government would be run at local and state levels, people wouldnt be so worried about national politics. national politics shouldnt even exist. all they are supposed to be doing is defending us, and making foreign treaties and regulating trade. not to much else. but you are right, the republic is dead, we are now a democracy where the majority rules the minority. and this is thought of as a good thing. its not. it wont be long and the democracy will vote away all rights of the people in the name of 'democracy.' Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fermentor666 Posted August 29, 2007 Share Posted August 29, 2007 Again, I never said there were no flaws. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WORDISM45 Posted August 29, 2007 Share Posted August 29, 2007 everyone could be somewhat happy with the results if we followed the constitution and the federal government followed itto the tee. then DC would be so small and insignificant and government would be run at local and state levels, people wouldnt be so worried about national politics. national politics shouldnt even exist. all they are supposed to be doing is defending us, and making foreign treaties and regulating trade. not to much else. but you are right, the republic is dead, we are now a democracy where the majority rules the minority. and this is thought of as a good thing. its not. it wont be long and the democracy will vote away all rights of the people in the name of 'democracy.' rome ay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lord_casek Posted September 9, 2007 Share Posted September 9, 2007 new hampshire debate http://www.spikedhumor.com/articles/124528/Ron_Paul_at_the_Fox_Debates.html fuck that snickering rudy ghouliani. fuck him and faux news. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mercer Posted September 9, 2007 Share Posted September 9, 2007 everyone could be somewhat happy with the results if we followed the constitution and the federal government followed itto the tee. then DC would be so small and insignificant and government would be run at local and state levels, people wouldnt be so worried about national politics. national politics shouldnt even exist. all they are supposed to be doing is defending us, and making foreign treaties and regulating trade. not to much else. but you are right, the republic is dead, we are now a democracy where the majority rules the minority. and this is thought of as a good thing. its not. it wont be long and the democracy will vote away all rights of the people in the name of 'democracy.' He who gives up liberty for security deservs neither - B. Frank. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vanfullofretards Posted September 10, 2007 Author Share Posted September 10, 2007 That is quote is crazy over used. That's not even the exact quote btw Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lord_casek Posted September 10, 2007 Share Posted September 10, 2007 That is quote is crazy over used. That's not even the exact quote btw Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. satisfied? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vanfullofretards Posted September 10, 2007 Author Share Posted September 10, 2007 I dont care enough to be satisfied.. just lettin peeps know, ya know? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WORDISM45 Posted September 10, 2007 Share Posted September 10, 2007 That is quote is crazy over used. That's not even the exact quote btw fucking oath some pseudo-intellectual or other posts that quote at least once every 3 days in crossfire Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mercer Posted September 10, 2007 Share Posted September 10, 2007 I thought I'd stick with tradition. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thecoldmidwest Posted September 11, 2007 Share Posted September 11, 2007 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lord_casek Posted September 11, 2007 Share Posted September 11, 2007 nice stamp. i've just been writing it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WORDISM45 Posted September 12, 2007 Share Posted September 12, 2007 am i a conspiracy nut or is this little faggot so cowardly that hes pretending to be for Ron while mocking and besmirching both him and what he stands for? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lord_casek Posted September 12, 2007 Share Posted September 12, 2007 tucker carlson is a bastard. fake conservative. i don't know how he could keep a straight face and act like he is a supporter. when dr. paul was on his show he said "you can't win" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ILOTSMYBRAIN Posted September 12, 2007 Share Posted September 12, 2007 i think ron should roll out into the next debate with some strippers, dj clue and rip taylor. that's so made of win. who wouldn't vote for him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MnTC Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kiIBUIWJNLM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angelofdeath Posted September 17, 2007 Share Posted September 17, 2007 i dont know, i have a soft spot in my heart for tucker. he is one of the only friendly journalists towards paul. i think he is truly a supporter but doesnt want to ruin his credibility. who knows he might get booted off the air if he goes over the top and pledges his undying support for paul. he said in his first interview with paul that he voted for him in 88, and basically supports him now. he always says he wins the debates. but i dont think he is a plumb line paul supporter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lord_casek Posted September 26, 2007 Share Posted September 26, 2007 http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2007/09/bush-speech-has.html is this surprising? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juan Fuentes Posted September 26, 2007 Share Posted September 26, 2007 haha! he probably also had pictures and certain coloured sentences to speak in different emotional tones...maybe even body language direction? (blink twice, look up) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shitting Posted September 26, 2007 Share Posted September 26, 2007 he wants another 911 investigation? sounds like a douche Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WORDISM45 Posted September 26, 2007 Share Posted September 26, 2007 he wants another 911 investigation? sounds like a douche i think it's more about the intelligence and warnings surrounding 9/11, he has already stated that he doesnt think the government was involved in a conspiracy. but hey you already admitted you didn't know anything about him and were just talking out yo arse anyway :D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lord_casek Posted September 26, 2007 Share Posted September 26, 2007 i think a new investigation, without cronies of the bush administration, would be in order. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ILOTSMYBRAIN Posted September 26, 2007 Share Posted September 26, 2007 It's almost a universal belief that the 9/11 commissions report is full of inaccuracies. Based off this alone, the fact that the "official story" from our government was released, and is full of inaccuracies, how could you not say that there was at least some involvement, or why lie? Oh wait, why make the mistake to cause the inaccuracy? Because we all know that they have no idea that they were being inaccurate. :rolleyes: I just don't see how if you were completely unbiased, and had nothing to hide why these inaccuracies would even exist, after all, this is one of the worst disasters in American history, not to mention lead us into two wars and thousands more American lives, and innocent civilians around the world. If they did exist, why those people involved wouldn't be investigated, and further studies should be conducted to fix those inaccuracies. You would think concerning a event of this importance that those problems would be ironed out. At any cost. After all, we are pursuing the people that supposedly orchestrated this attack with such vigor. To me when you have information that is being hidden, it means that people are trying to keep information that can hurt them or people they know, thus keeping it away from the public. So I don't understand how anyone can honestly sit back and say that what we are being told happened on 9/11 is exactly how it went down. Because if that were so why are so many people dropping the ball? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vanfullofretards Posted September 26, 2007 Author Share Posted September 26, 2007 First off, no one ever said it was the official story, it was just a report. Second, wrong thread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juan Fuentes Posted September 27, 2007 Share Posted September 27, 2007 too many people would be involved if they really make a serious investigation. it hasnt happened because of all the guilty ones preventing it. starting with the media, those liars do anything to ridiculize 911 truth, but they dont censor it completly because that would cause people to be really curious about it. yeah wrong thread Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UPS! Posted September 28, 2007 Share Posted September 28, 2007 Ron Paul is the only man runnin id put in office Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lord_casek Posted September 28, 2007 Share Posted September 28, 2007 yep. if everyone who believes in his message votes for him, i think it will send a clear message. right now it's looking like billary clinton is being pushed. a repeat of 2000/2004 elections? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ILOTSMYBRAIN Posted October 1, 2007 Share Posted October 1, 2007 why is what i said in the wrong thread? what i said was based off the comment of a new investigation into 9/11 which is what Ron Paul is deffinatly for. i may have gone on a little rant, but all of it is relevant. as far as the commisons report not being the official story. "The National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (also known as the 9-11 Commission), an independent, bipartisan commission created by congressional legislation and the signature of President George W. Bush in late 2002, is chartered to prepare a full and complete account of the circumstances surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, including preparedness for and the immediate response to the attacks." ron paul is the only man/women i'd vote for as well. if hillary gets in what is that a guaranteed 40 years at least under bush/clinton? pretty scurry if you ask me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juan Fuentes Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 ron paul had a 114% increase in donations this month. the other republicans has 40s% decrease. everyday people find out about ron paul. there some that just WAIT until they have the two major candidates in tv and 2 weeks to vote, how lazy, that explains why has america turned into nazi germany. lazyness. spread ron paul's message. there is a CHANCE. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thinksmall Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 ^^ I NOES... http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/10/03/paul-raises-more-than-5-million/ DUUUDE. RON PAUL = PRESIDENT 2008. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.