suca Posted February 26, 2008 Share Posted February 26, 2008 seriously. ok. im from seattle, reallllly liberal, realllllly democratic. YOU running for president is going to take NEEDED VOTES from the democrats because of the fucking HIPPIES that follow you, who would otherwise vote democratic, and we;re gonna end up with ANOTHER fucking republican in the white house! FUCK the only tihnk i hate more than nader is political threads. wait.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pfffffffffft Posted February 26, 2008 Share Posted February 26, 2008 this guy as an asshole.. he fucked shit up last time too plus there is nooooo way he can win the presidency.. why to fuck things up ralphy!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
publicenemyno.3 Posted February 26, 2008 Share Posted February 26, 2008 you think he'd just give the fuck up. hippies... same thing with this ron paul motherfucker, all the hippies i know are like "yo im voting for ron paul." john mccain is going to win, its an inevitability. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KILZ FILLZ Posted February 26, 2008 Share Posted February 26, 2008 havent you guys learned its all a facade? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R@ndomH3ro Posted February 26, 2008 Share Posted February 26, 2008 Nader is just wasting his money What a moron Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeeWhy-ish Posted February 26, 2008 Share Posted February 26, 2008 Yea, hippies were better when they blew themselves up and said fuck voting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.Big Pants Posted February 26, 2008 Share Posted February 26, 2008 We need a ralph nader not a darth vader Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torquemada Posted February 26, 2008 Share Posted February 26, 2008 YEAH!! fuck mccain too! fuck everyone else of the lesser known candidates too! fuck having a choice on who you want to run your fucking country!!111 i'm not saying i'm voting for dude or anything, but these dems need to shut the fuck about the nader's taking our votes shit cause same thing can be said for the dems taking nader's votes. why don't you pansies just start saying mccain should stop running cause you think he's going to take all the 'undecided' voters or whatever, shit's ridiculous. if obama loses by a couple thousand votes it's not going to be nader's fault, it's going to be obama's for not convincing the people who voted for nader that he would make a better president than nader. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vanfullofretards Posted February 26, 2008 Share Posted February 26, 2008 The lesser known candidates seem to be way more honest and certainly a lot less influenced by lobbyists. Some (like Ron Paul) don't even accept donations from lobbyists. "why waste my vote on him? he's not going to win." That's the attitude of millions and millions of people in this country. Even if they agree with him on most/all the issues the voter still wont vote for him because of this attitude but they fail to realize one thing... The single reason that candidate doesn't have a chance is BECAUSE of that attitude. Picking the lesser of two evils is still picking evil. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tipsycripsy420 Posted February 26, 2008 Share Posted February 26, 2008 i love how he just waltzed in the election this late in the game Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Realism Posted February 26, 2008 Share Posted February 26, 2008 Nader is not doing it because he can win. He's doing it because he wants to illuminate "certain issues." I think it's retarded but apparently he doesn't Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torquemada Posted February 26, 2008 Share Posted February 26, 2008 he had plans on running, but only if clinton got the nomination..i'm pretty sure he said that anyways.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustinTimberlake Posted February 26, 2008 Share Posted February 26, 2008 YEAH!! fuck mccain too! fuck everyone else of the lesser known candidates too! fuck having a choice on who you want to run your fucking country!!111 i'm not saying i'm voting for dude or anything, but these dems need to shut the fuck about the nader's taking our votes shit cause same thing can be said for the dems taking nader's votes. why don't you pansies just start saying mccain should stop running cause you think he's going to take all the 'undecided' voters or whatever, shit's ridiculous. if obama loses by a couple thousand votes it's not going to be nader's fault, it's going to be obama's for not convincing the people who voted for nader that he would make a better president than nader. quotin dis Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KILZ FILLZ Posted February 26, 2008 Share Posted February 26, 2008 i repeat havent you guys learned its all a facade? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poop Man Bob Posted February 26, 2008 Share Posted February 26, 2008 Thanks, Nader. You really made your point in 2000. Democrats and Republicans are totally the same. Because this would have happened under President Gore's watch: So thanks for that. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustinTimberlake Posted February 26, 2008 Share Posted February 26, 2008 bad shit happens so relax Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DAVAK Posted February 26, 2008 Share Posted February 26, 2008 how is katrina anyones fault? oh and those bastards deserved to be "tortured" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KILZ FILLZ Posted February 26, 2008 Share Posted February 26, 2008 i believe he was thinking about the lack of action afterwards why does someone who hasnt been charged with anything deserved to be tortured? yes, yes, i know -> crossfire Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DAVAK Posted February 26, 2008 Share Posted February 26, 2008 i dont want to prove my point too much typing Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KILZ FILLZ Posted February 26, 2008 Share Posted February 26, 2008 cop-out Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torquemada Posted February 26, 2008 Share Posted February 26, 2008 Thanks, Nader. You really made your point in 2000. Democrats and Republicans are totally the same. Because this would have happened under President Gore's watch: So thanks for that. there were other candidates too you know, it wasn't just nader, why not blame it on any of the other candidates? or what about blaming it on stupid americans that voted for bush? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Realism Posted February 26, 2008 Share Posted February 26, 2008 how is katrina anyones fault? oh and those bastards deserved to be "tortured" Katrina was such a debacle because of poor response/provision of aid by the government. Additionally, the levees should not have been in disrepair. Then the floods would not have been so widespread and destructive. Both of these duties fall under the federal government...which falls under the current administration. That is how it was someone's fault. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torquemada Posted February 26, 2008 Share Posted February 26, 2008 OR how about blaming bush for everything that bush has done? btw i heard nader planned 9/11 too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KILZ FILLZ Posted February 26, 2008 Share Posted February 26, 2008 or how about electronic voting machines or w's brother Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poop Man Bob Posted February 26, 2008 Share Posted February 26, 2008 Nader's argument centered on the fact that the Democrats and the Republicans are one in the same. With the Florida vote separated by around 600 votes (and that's accepting what the R's argue), then Nader's decision to continue pressing in Florida so late in the 2000 election cycle was critical. Especially given the fact that the polls showed Florida to be so close. I'm not arguing that Nader was the sole contributing factor to Florida going to Bush - I'm not stupid. But his argument that the Rs and the Ds are the same is stupid. And history has proven it to be so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poop Man Bob Posted February 26, 2008 Share Posted February 26, 2008 Katrina was such a debacle because of poor response/provision of aid by the government. Additionally, the levees should not have been in disrepair. Then the floods would not have been so widespread and destructive. Both of these duties fall under the federal government...which falls under the current administration. That is how it was someone's fault. Correct. That's what I was suggesting through the photo. Not that Bush has a weather machine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poop Man Bob Posted February 26, 2008 Share Posted February 26, 2008 OR how about blaming bush for everything that bush has done? Re-read my post. I didn't blame Nader for Bush's actions. I said that Nader's R=D argument is bullshit, as what's represented in the photos would not have happened in a Gore administration. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torquemada Posted February 26, 2008 Share Posted February 26, 2008 it just came off as thanking nader for everything bush has done which everyone loves to do... i got a feeling this is just going to turn into a 50 page crossfire thread where nobody changes anybody's opinion about anything.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DAVAK Posted February 26, 2008 Share Posted February 26, 2008 Katrina was such a debacle because of poor response/provision of aid by the government. Additionally, the levees should not have been in disrepair. Then the floods would not have been so widespread and destructive. Both of these duties fall under the federal government...which falls under the current administration. That is how it was someone's fault. or don't build a town BELOW THE FUCKING SEA LEVEL then don't move/live there!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KILZ FILLZ Posted February 26, 2008 Share Posted February 26, 2008 http://www.wreg.com/Global/story.asp?S=7919517 you guys heard about this? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.