old*824 Posted February 3, 2004 Share Posted February 3, 2004 i feel kinna bad for janet that her music cred. isnt enough to release an album on anymore and she has to resort to boob flashing shennanigans to create controversy to pump her album, aided and abbetted by a boy band singer. oh and by the way the president lied to start a war. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 3, 2004 Share Posted February 3, 2004 Originally posted by Poop Man Bob I'm suing everyone. yeah... well I'll counter sue you on behalf of everybody. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HYDRO BILL Posted February 3, 2004 Share Posted February 3, 2004 but.. it was only a PARTIAL boobie. that's not nudity, prime time or not. I've seen that much tit on MTV videos 24 hrs a day. Superbowl injuries are way more affecting (eg. theismann) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smart Posted February 3, 2004 Share Posted February 3, 2004 MTV is cable Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest WebsterUno Posted February 3, 2004 Share Posted February 3, 2004 *believe* Originally posted by Smart ... it was just a bit uncouth... and thats all I was trying to say. everyone else: thanks for making me feel like raging conservative bastard! I love you too! now, back to your regularly scheduled reprogramming. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
old*824 Posted February 3, 2004 Share Posted February 3, 2004 i see your point Webster, I would be pissed if my kid was exposed to Janets boob to. Especially since it involved justin timberlake. and with all that shit going on with her brother...ehk, to fuggin weird. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ElectricitySucks Posted February 3, 2004 Share Posted February 3, 2004 my friend has that sony io thing or something like that when you could rewind live tv. so right after the boob pop out, we watched it in slow motion plenty of times in laughter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mellow Mood Posted February 3, 2004 Share Posted February 3, 2004 i didnt see it anyone have a non censered picture? im positive there out there.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don't Panic Posted February 3, 2004 Share Posted February 3, 2004 You missed absolutely nothing, she has a gigantic pastie covering her nipple. Unless she is wearing a t-shirt, you can see more breast popping out on nearly any girl at a mall. Who the fuck actually watches the halftime show? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 4, 2004 Share Posted February 4, 2004 it's NOT a pastie. it's called a shield. the shield is held on with a cross bar that pierces the nipple. Janet is clearly a freak. http://www.chaineddesires.com/bodyjewelry/img24.gif'> P2! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S@T@N Posted February 4, 2004 Author Share Posted February 4, 2004 Originally posted by old*824 i feel kinna bad for janet that her music cred. isnt enough to release an album on anymore and she has to resort to boob flashing shennanigans to create controversy to pump her album, aided and abbetted by a boy band singer. oh and by the way the president lied to start a war. get a fucking helmet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gunm Posted February 4, 2004 Share Posted February 4, 2004 Funny how everyone got all worked up over a tit but it's perfectly alright and sit your kids and family down to a modern day gladitorial match where grown men go out of their way to hurt one another for posession of a ball. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr.yuck Posted February 4, 2004 Share Posted February 4, 2004 I hope they excecute the both of them. I really didn't want to see that shit. If i had 50 billion dollars I would shoot them from a catupult directly into the ground, Wiley Coyote style. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
old*824 Posted February 4, 2004 Share Posted February 4, 2004 ? what do i need a helmet for. let me explain my view on this rather trivial event done in poor taste that is running headlines because the media loves to dramatize(sp) pointless things in poor taste, and such non pointless things, like double spouse murders in really poortaste. anyway... its a parents responsibility to explain things to a child right. so now a parent has to explain to thier child why the boob is not a bad thing but the other guy reaching over and pulling the cloth off the boob and exposing is not ok and if someone ever tries to do that to her make sure she tells a adult right away. cause you know, kids can take a lot from what they see on tv and there's a lotta kids and a lotta tv's and theres a lotta parents who wont get a chance to have that conversation. so if you really look at it its mearly a milestone of how gentrified and corrupt and value poor our culture is. so this more paralells the fact of european and canadian soft porn on network tv. eventually your kids gonna ask questions and its no big deal cause soft porn is on every in the country. as opposed to california where if you expose a child to soft porn you can go to jail. and if shes downa show her tits why didnt she just put a topless photo on her cd or some shit. *btw wasnt there a topless football game on payperview? and i dont understand why they dont have more nudity on tv. but all i watched was digital cable and there was sex girl on girl porn and all that shit we got for free. but if i had a kid, they would watch very little tv and id make em watch smart things. and if they wanted to watch the superbowl and i knew janet was gonna flash her tit depnding on the age of the child id send em to the kitchen to get somthing you know? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyuzo Posted February 4, 2004 Share Posted February 4, 2004 I hate soccermoms... I hate them so very very much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
imported_dowmagik Posted February 4, 2004 Share Posted February 4, 2004 Originally posted by Don't Panic Who the fuck actually watches the halftime show? uh...apparently millions and millions of people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest imported_Tesseract Posted February 4, 2004 Share Posted February 4, 2004 :tongue: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest me IS cool Posted February 4, 2004 Share Posted February 4, 2004 Originally posted by Hank Parker IT'S THAT GOD DAMN MTV! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nomadawhat Posted February 4, 2004 Share Posted February 4, 2004 fuck janet.... i was pretty disturbed that kid rock desecrated the flag!!! what kind of example is that??? http://www.mtv.com/onair/super_bowl/2004/flipbooks/half_time/images/HalfTime_Shearer003.jpg'> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don't Panic Posted February 4, 2004 Share Posted February 4, 2004 Originally posted by dowmagik uh...apparently millions and millions of people. Really? Because I didn't know. Here you go, note #2- it's kind of relevant. Kilo- how can you tell? I've never seen a shield that damn big. On the incident: From si.comSo this is how far Janet Jackson's career has plummeted -- playing the part of an "unwitting" boob? And let's be honest here: It was staged, whether MTV, CBS or the NFL wants to admit it. Why else would she be wearing some medieval nipple plate over that certain area that just so happened to unexpectedly get more exposure than her last album? There are manhole covers smaller than that starburst Miss Jackson (since we're being nasty) was sporting. And who was Johnny-on-the-spot in charge of flipping off the lights after the bosom was exposed? Notice we all saw just enough to know it happened, and then -- boob! er, boom! -- it was over. Tell me again this wasn't staged. The Super Bowl has evolved into sport's biggest spectacle, and Sunday night only furthered its standing as must-see TV, especially for the nincompoop crowd to whom these halftime shows cater. Apparently, wannabe pop icon Justin Timberlake wanted to make sure his name went down with the other notable halftime acts, like ... umm, well ... just go sit next to Ricky Martin. Again, convince me it wasn't staged. Oh the humanity, feigned the NFL. We've likely seen the last of MTV's halftime productions, said league executive VP Joe Browne. Whew, there's no telling what the folks at Music Television would have concocted given another 52 weeks to ponder; Lil Kim exposing both breasts, perhaps? But really, it wasn't staged. It was a "wardrobe malfunction," according to Timberlake. It was his only on-cue lip-sync of the night. And after extensive examination of photos taken immediately following the "wardrobe malfunction," this reporter would like it known for the record that a) the leather was not torn and B) neither was the brassiere. There are no tell-tale signs of distress to either garment. (It was an exhaustive effort to closely examine the photos, but hey, someone had to do it.) What, the black leather was supposed to rip, revealing only the polka-dotted red lace bra? Dude, c'mon, we've all seen more than that on the Victoria's Secret made-for-TV special. I mean, this is the "boob tube" we're talking about. Of course the lyrics to the song left little to the imagination. Rock Your Body ends with the line, 'Cause I gotta have you naked by the end of this song.' Apropos, don't you think? But, say it again: It was not staged. And be sure to drink the Kool-Aid on your way out. However, there is one other thing clearly evident in the wake of the Breast Damn Sports Show, Period fallout: At least those who saw Janet's bosom didn't ante up $19.99 to watch the Lingerie Bowl. The folks who paid for that are the biggest boobs of all. B. Duane Cross is a senior producer for SI.com. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smart Posted February 4, 2004 Share Posted February 4, 2004 yeah, I actually forgot about my outrage about K. Rock draped in the flag... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ferris Bueller Posted February 4, 2004 Share Posted February 4, 2004 As if the monkey in the Budweiser commercial wasn't questionable. Boobs, inuendo, what's the difference. It's just the fact that this country is so selfish. One person can be heard over thousands of others who frankly couldn't give a shit about a booby on TV. I found it quite humorous. Everyone I was with found it humorous, atleast the ones who saw it. The ones who didn't were too busy being drunk and jealous, but whatever. What do parents do when they take their children to Europe for a vacation in Italy, and see a billboard with titties all over it? Send complaints to the US Consul or some bullshit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest imported_Tesseract Posted February 4, 2004 Share Posted February 4, 2004 puritans Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
imported_dowmagik Posted February 4, 2004 Share Posted February 4, 2004 Originally posted by nomadawhat fuck janet.... i was pretty disturbed that kid rock desecrated the flag!!! what kind of example is that??? http://www.mtv.com/onair/super_bowl/2004/flipbooks/half_time/images/HalfTime_Shearer003.jpg'> i said the same thing when i saw that shit. NOTE TO PEOPLE OUTSIDE USA: WE'RE NOT ALL FAT ASSHOLES. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheoHuxtable Posted February 4, 2004 Share Posted February 4, 2004 This is why I'm against inter-racial relationships. Because they end up conspiring to reveal their titties on the Superbowl in front of 87 million viewers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wiseguy Posted February 4, 2004 Share Posted February 4, 2004 it is just funny that it is such an issue, i didnt see a problem with it at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.