Jump to content

ARCHITECTURE


b.hussein

Recommended Posts

That house is a piece of shit anyway, architecturally speaking. People forget that houses are like cars and if a $150,000 car costs $11,000,000 to fix, it's probably a bad design. Those cantilevers are solid concrete and are basically destroying the home. Plus it's built over a river, in a humid environment, which is kind of a bad idea if you dont want your structure to rot and smell like mildew. Even Frank would be embarrassed and want it demolished.

 

the concrete is out of place, I disagree on the setting. I worked at Lucas arts in San Rafael, Gorge has many sound studios, theaters and offices mixed in that look like amazing homes in a similar setting. One in particular the brook house has a large stream running through a stone arch designed in to the foundation. Oh and....... about Frank........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This forum is supported by the 12ozProphet Shop, so go buy a shirt and help support!
This forum is brought to you by the 12ozProphet Shop.
This forum is brought to you by the 12oz Shop.
  • Replies 283
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

No the concrete isnt out of place. It's literally tearing the house apart from the sheer weight of it. Unless you're one of those northbay twats who think architecture is just "art" that looks nice you wont give that house a second look. If you like it it's all yours. Enjoy living in the middle of bumfuck nowhere with hot humid summers and fridgid winters in a house that smells like mildew, is always too hot or too cold and will cost you millions of dollars a year to upkeep. It's a bad design. Get over it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That house is a piece of shit anyway, architecturally speaking. People forget that houses are like cars and if a $150,000 car costs $11,000,000 to fix, it's probably a bad design. Those cantilevers are solid concrete and are basically destroying the home. Plus it's built over a river, in a humid environment, which is kind of a bad idea if you dont want your structure to rot and smell like mildew. Even Frank would be embarrassed and want it demolished.

 

You are a tit. Your comments on the structural integrity of the home are mindless.You are nothing more then a wedge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are a tit. Your comments on the structural integrity of the home are mindless.You are nothing more then a wedge.

Uh, If you want to be ignorant that's something you gotta live with. Just like you think spraycan cartoon characters is graffiti, or think your moped is a motorcycle.

 

For everyone else:

 

Keep in mind that building cost $150,000 to build in 1937 (Approx $2m by today's standards) They spent $11 million in 2004 in TAXPAYERS DOLLARS to keep that building from collapsing because there is almost nothing holding those concrete cantilevers in place (Frank's fault and he knew it). You have any idea what you could do with 11 million dollars? You could build 5 more of those houses from nothing and engineer them properly. Those cantilevers were sagging on day one back in 1937 and the whole building has been slowly eroding since, requiring two major rebuilds in less than 70 years. There are immaculate ranch houses in California that cost 10 times less than the initial cost of that building and they're still around with no need for refurbishing for over a hundred years.

 

People forget houses are like cars, planes, motorcycles or anything else: beauty is in the performance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...