Avesism Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 back peddling? hardly. you are a hypocrite. i bring up the fact that you c\go to college because you spell horribly, have little or no attention span, and have no ability to detect when someone is being sarcastic. i.e.: "O'RLY" replacing O'Reilly. so, to you i say, bring it. i'm down for an intellectual debate with a mongo. almost forgot to reply to your "number 2." the medicine sucks when it's spoon fed back, eh? oh, i see, you werent given the chance to go to college. im sorry to hear that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lord_casek Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 oh, i see, you werent given the chance to go to college. im sorry to hear that. wasn't given or chose not to attend for very long. hell, now that i've seen the people it turns out, i'm pretty happy about my choice. you know, the one i wasn't given? instead, i took a chance on expanding my already vast knowledge of computers and turned that into something pretty fruitful. gosh! and i missed that opportunity to be "given" something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avesism Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 ROFL! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lord_casek Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 yes. so funny. instead of being instructed by someone, i instructed myself. jeez, that is hilarious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avesism Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 YOU MAAAD!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lord_casek Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 you're slightly retarded. i'm done with running in circles with you. it's like trying to explain the finer points of databasing to a monkey. pointless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avesism Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thinksmall Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=teMlv3ripSM no it isn't! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the.crooked Posted February 14, 2008 Share Posted February 14, 2008 Casek... My dude. You are sounding ridiculous. I respect a lot of things you have to say on this board. But, a lot of this is retarded. That link you sent me about winning an argument the other week... cmon. There is a difference between winning an argument and being right. and you my friend are going well beyond logical argumentation and straight in to bullshit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WORDISM45 Posted February 14, 2008 Share Posted February 14, 2008 HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA funniest thing ive seen all day Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lord_casek Posted February 14, 2008 Share Posted February 14, 2008 OBAMA SUPPORTS GLOBAL TAX BILL http://www.nationalledger.com/artman/publish/article_272618845.shtml Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ILOTSMYBRAIN Posted February 15, 2008 Share Posted February 15, 2008 Keep posting that Cam'ron pic. What I said on the previous page still holds to be true. LOL!OLW!@#OL!@# ^^^^^^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LIVERWURST* Posted February 15, 2008 Author Share Posted February 15, 2008 http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/some-black-superdelegates-reassess-clinton-support/ WASHINGTON (AP) – In a fresh sign of trouble for Hillary Rodham Clinton, one of the former first lady's congressional black supporters intends to vote for Barack Obama at the Democratic National Convention, and a second, more prominent lawmaker is openly discussing a possible switch. Rep. David Scott's defection and Rep. John Lewis' remarks highlight one of the challenges confronting Clinton in a campaign that pits a black man against a woman for a nomination that historically has been the exclusive property of white men. But Christine Samuels, until this week a Clinton superdelegate from New Jersey, said during the day she is now supporting Obama. Two other superdelegates, Sophie Masloff of Pennsylvania and Nancy Larson of Minnesota, are uncommitted, having dropped their earlier endorsements of Clinton. On Wednesday, David Wilhelm, a longtime ally of the Clintons who had been neutral in the presidential race, endorsed Obama. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LIVERWURST* Posted February 15, 2008 Author Share Posted February 15, 2008 Obama 1,253 Clinton 1,211 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scaryletters Posted February 15, 2008 Share Posted February 15, 2008 i pray everyday obama wins the democratic nomination, he's not perfect but compared to that menopausal cunt of a robot hillary clinton he might as well be jesus christ himself. how does hillary pull in minority votes? honestly wtf? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avesism Posted February 15, 2008 Share Posted February 15, 2008 how does hillary pull in minority votes? honestly wtf? as polarizing as she is, she's still the wife of the first black president. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Mamerro Posted February 15, 2008 Share Posted February 15, 2008 I'm concerned about Puerto Rico. We got 63 delegates for the very last contest, and I'm thinking they're probably gonna go for Hillary. If Obama doesn't pad up a sizable lead shit could hit the fan. http://www.usnews.com/blogs/barone/2008/2/6/puerto-rican-poll-power.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LIVERWURST* Posted February 15, 2008 Author Share Posted February 15, 2008 That's a weird system of politicians over people. I wish the article clarified what mechanisms, for example Gov. Rafael Hernandez Colon, uses to control the delegates. Is it just good old salesmanship? Bullying? Or is the system set up so the delegates ultimately have to follow the leader, whom ever that may be? Any ideas? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thinksmall Posted February 16, 2008 Share Posted February 16, 2008 http://www.newswithviews.com/DeWeese/tom103.htm BEWARE: "FREE" MEDICAL CARE WILL KILL YOU - ON PURPOSE! "Case in point, this report from England (Don't treat the old and unhealthy, say doctors) where full government health care is "provided" free to every citizen. For years, free market advocates like myself have had to endure lectures from our little socialist friends about the glories of "free" health care. We keep pointing out that nothing is free - and now the folks in England may be paying for that health care with their lives - literally." "When government gets overburdened and revenues don't keep up with all the grand plans of a horde of politicians, someone has to feel the pain. Today, England's treasury can't keep up with the massive costs of health care. So the bureaucrats, such fiscally responsible folks - just serving the people, you understand - have decided the best way to cut costs is to stop providing health care to those who are too old or those who leave "unhealthy lives." Of course, government gets to decide who they are." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LIVERWURST* Posted February 16, 2008 Author Share Posted February 16, 2008 The lack of sitation combined with the obvious bias of that article gets your article the dookified thong of a fat girl working at Burger King. I bring this up everytime - I get that posting here forces us to rely on websites, some of which will be upfront with their bias, which is fine. But if you're going to make outrageous claims, such as stating that in England they're killing old people to save money, you kind of have to offer evidence. No wonder you all beleive the shit you do, you have no concept of objectivity. Fail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the.crooked Posted February 16, 2008 Share Posted February 16, 2008 hehe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thinksmall Posted February 16, 2008 Share Posted February 16, 2008 Don't treat the old and unhealthy, say doctors. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2008/01/27/nhs127.xml whats outrageous! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LIVERWURST* Posted February 16, 2008 Author Share Posted February 16, 2008 That is the findings of a survey of doctors, it is not a government initiative. Plus, the findings were just that doctors felt that some surgeries that are causes by the persons habits shouldn't be done because it is caused by lifestyle choices. They site obese people needing hip replacements or alcoholics needing liver transplants but refusing to stop drinking. Also some felt that elderly people who won't gain significant longevity from certain treatments should be declined, which isn't the same as refusing to treat the elderly. I'm not defending or advocating for either side of the discussion, but did you even read the article? Please don't come back in here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thinksmall Posted February 16, 2008 Share Posted February 16, 2008 "Among the survey of 870 family and hospital doctors, almost 60 per cent said the NHS could not provide full healthcare to everyone and that some individuals should pay for services." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thinksmall Posted February 16, 2008 Share Posted February 16, 2008 Nationalized Health Care is Broken . John Stossel http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2007/09/socialized_medicine_is_broken.html [ One hospital tried to save money by not changing bed sheets every day. British papers report that instead of washing them, nurses were encouraged to just turn them over. Government rationing of health care in Canada is why when Karen Jepp was about to give birth to quadruplets last month, she was told that all the neonatal units she could go to in Canada were too crowded. She flew to Montana to have the babies. "People line up for care; some of them die. That's what happens," Canadian doctor David Gratzer, author of The Cure, told "20/20". Gratzer thought the Canadian system was great until he started treating patients. "The more time I spent in the Canadian system, the more I came across people waiting. ... You want to see your neurologist because of your stress headache? No problem! You just have to wait six months. You want an MRI? No problem! Free as the air! You just gotta wait six months. ] --------------------- "They don't care how long you wait. They'll get to you sooner or later. But it's free. It's free." - Lindsay Mcreith, of Ontario, who had symptoms of a seizure and headaches, had to fly to Buffalo to get an MRI. The MRI showed that Mcreith had a tumor. After, he had to get surgery done in Buffalo - the wait time in Ontario would have killed him. "Now I understand that there is this movement afoot in the U.S. by certain circles to try and duplicate the Canadian system in the U.S. Trying to adopt the single-payer system in the U.S. Then where will I send my clients? I'll have no where to send my clients. Your hospitals will be packed up. You people will be waiting two or three years for surgery. I'll have no where to send Canadians." - Rick Baker of Timely Medical Alternatives. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Theo Huxtable. Posted February 17, 2008 Share Posted February 17, 2008 Next crucial states -- Texas, Ohio, Wisconsin, and Hawaii. It looks like Obama will take Hawaii easily... and he's slightly ahead in Wisconsin and Texas according to polls. Ohio on the other hand might go to Clinton. If Obama were to win both Ohio and Texas (the most crucial), not to mention the other two -- Clinton might as well throw in the towel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LIVERWURST* Posted February 17, 2008 Author Share Posted February 17, 2008 And "winning" doesn't even matter really. If he can just keep the scales tipped in his favor I hope it will send a message to the super delegates. They don't want to be seen as robbing the people of their choice so hopefully enough will get behind Obama. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thinksmall Posted February 17, 2008 Share Posted February 17, 2008 Imagine Michael Moore getting denied healthcare in 2010 because of his weight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LIVERWURST* Posted February 17, 2008 Author Share Posted February 17, 2008 Imagine Ron Paul winning a presidential election in 200NEVER. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the.crooked Posted February 17, 2008 Share Posted February 17, 2008 ZING! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.