Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...
Sign in to follow this  
Guest Dusty Lipschitz

cashier at porn shop arrested for selling porn

Recommended Posts

Guest --zeSto--

such bullshit...

 

Euro Angels#20 wasn't even any good!

 

 

it's just a bullshit cash trap for the hick police dep't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest willy.wonka

sure was a long report on a porn movie...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dallas is a Baptist town. I'm surprised anybody is dumb enough to sell porno there, it's kind of a set up. Back in the '60s, of course, there were all kinds of strip clubs and places that did sort of semi-nude dancing, etc. Remember Jack Ruby? All the cops knew him, the D.A., everybody. And why? Because they all hung out at his clubs and played footsie with his dancers. He was, of course, Mafia, controlled by the New Orleans mob.

 

I bet you dimes to dollars the cops raided that place because it's not owned by the "right'" people.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

its pretty funny what kind of stuff you can find in a porno store. my g/f wanted me to go buy her some porn and the cashier looked like a harley ridin mexican. he had a fat village people mustache, slicked back ponytail, a leather jacket, about 300 lbs, sunglasses and tattoos all over him. he offered me some lubricant for a few bucks. ....creepy

 

p.s.if you ever come across a video named "white trash whore" and you wonder why 1 white girl is posing in the middle of 7 black guys....dont turn the box over to see why. so i got nuthin against buying porno in dallas.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest platapie

i use to work in a porno store.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest uncle-boy
Originally posted by platapie

i use to work in a porno store.

 

until his boss realized he was a dirty, talking, duck billed, mamml.:mad:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest FoReVeRpHLy

any1 that sells porn 2 kids should get a medal not be arrested god damn commis

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest platapie
Originally posted by uncle-boy

 

until his boss realized he was a dirty, talking, duck billed, mamml.:mad:

 

 

i wasnt dirty!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On a related note...

 

Judges Nix Library Internet Filters

Fri May 31, 3:55 PM ET

By DAVID B. CARUSO, Associated Press Writer

 

PHILADELPHIA (AP) - Public libraries cannot be forced to use Internet filters designed to block pornography, three federal judges said Friday in overturning a new federal law.

 

Photos

 

AP Photo

 

 

In a 195-page decision, the judges said the Children's Internet Protection Act went too far because the filters can also block access to sites that contain protected speech.

 

"Any public library that adheres to CIPA's conditions will necessarily restrict patrons' access to a substantial amount of protected speech in violation of the First Amendment," the judges wrote.

 

The law, signed by President Clinton (news - web sites) in 2000, would have required public libraries to install the filters by July 1 or risk losing federal funding. It had been widely criticized by First Amendment groups.

 

"There is no correction to the law that can be made here to save it," said Stefan Presser, the American Civil Liberties Union (news - web sites)'s legal director in Pennsylvania. "The technology cannot block simply obscene speech, or speech that is harmful to minors, without blocking an enormous amount of speech that is constitutionally protected."

 

The judges, who heard nearly two weeks of testimony in April, wrote that they were concerned that library patrons who wanted to view sites blocked by filtering software might be embarrassed or lose their right to remain anonymous because they would have to ask permission to have the sites unblocked.

 

Any appeal of the decision by 3rd U.S. Circuit Judge Edward R. Becker and U.S. District judges John P. Fullam and Harvey Bartle III would go directly to the U.S. Supreme Court (news - web sites).

 

A message left for a Justice Department (news - web sites) spokesman was not immediately returned Friday.

 

The decision was applauded by the American Library Association and the ACLU, which contended the law was unenforceable, unconstitutional, vague and overbroad. They argued it denied poor people without home computers the same access to information as their wealthier neighbors because the software could mistakenly block Web sites on issues such as breast cancer (news - web sites) and homosexuality.

 

Schools and school libraries are still subject to the law, the American Library Association said.

 

Justice Department lawyers argued that Internet smut is so pervasive that protections are necessary to keep it away from youngsters, and that the law simply calls for libraries to use the same care in selecting online content that they use for books and magazines.

 

They also pointed out that libraries could turn down the federal funding if they want to provide unfiltered Web access.

 

David Burt, a spokesman for N2H2, a Seattle-based maker of filtering software, said that while the programs do improperly block some sites, the error-rate is low enough that libraries should be able to use them.

 

The Children's Internet Protection Act was the third anti-Internet-porn law brought before federal judges for constitutional challenges.

 

The 1996 Communications Decency Act made it a crime to put adult-oriented material online where children can find it. It was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.

 

The 1998 Child Online Protection Act required Web sites to collect a credit card number or other proof of age before allowing Internet users to view material deemed "harmful to minors." The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals (news - web sites) barred enforcement of that law, saying the standards were so broad and vague that the law was probably unconstitutional.

 

The Supreme Court partially upheld the law in May, but did not rule on its constitutionality as a whole. It remains on hold for further action in lower courts.

 

___

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest --zeSto--

who the hell would want to look at porn in the library.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

werd you cant beat off in public, right???:confused:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Smart---Why is this girl's face fuzzed out? I don't get it. It's kind of wierd.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

a question I have asked myself KaBar... but, alas, the answer eludes me...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

$10 is low wage? damn. Minimum wage (which is not strictly enforced) here is equivalent to exactly $5.69. I'd love a job that paid $10

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I'd love a job..................................:(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Register for a 12ozProphet forum account or sign in to comment

You need to be a forum member in order to comment. Forum accounts are separate from shop accounts.

Create an account

Register to become a 12ozProphet forum member.

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×