Look, I call it a "fashion" forum because If I have to type "luxury lifestyle forum" every time I want to reference your faggotty forum I'll have to trace your IP and send a big leaky box of smelly whale dicks to your front door. If I'm honest, the term I would prefer to use is "faggy" forum, because that's the word that pops into my head when I imagine a bunch of dudes chatting on a forum about ways they would love to spend cash— but I thought I'd try to be respectful and use the word "fashion" instead.
The "1%" refers to the top household income earners in America, which is anyone who makes roughly $250,000... or 713 Jackalopes in Australian currency. That would make me part of the 1%.
How is he not a minister? You literally JUST referred to him as a minister. The news article refers to him a minister. He refers to himself as a minister. A minister is not exactly a hard title to receive. Here, you can become one too in seconds: http://www.themonastery.org/ What's the point you're trying to make by saying he isn't a minister?