lord_casek Posted October 31, 2006 Share Posted October 31, 2006 Bush Moves Toward Martial Law In a stealth maneuver, President Bush has signed into law a provision which, according to Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vermont), will actually encourage the President to declare federal martial law (1). It does so by revising the Insurrection Act, a set of laws that limits the President's ability to deploy troops within the United States. The Insurrection Act (10 U.S.C.331 -335) has historically, along with the Posse Comitatus Act (18 U.S.C.1385), helped to enforce strict prohibitions on military involvement in domestic law enforcement. With one cloaked swipe of his pen, Bush is seeking to undo those prohibitions. Public Law 109-364, or the "John Warner Defense Authorization Act of 2007" (H.R.5122) (2), which was signed by the commander in chief on October 17th, 2006, in a private Oval Office ceremony, allows the President to declare a "public emergency" and station troops anywhere in America and take control of state-based National Guard units without the consent of the governor or local authorities, in order to "suppress public disorder." President Bush seized this unprecedented power on the very same day that he signed the equally odious Military Commissions Act of 2006. In a sense, the two laws complement one another. One allows for torture and detention abroad, while the other seeks to enforce acquiescence at home, preparing to order the military onto the streets of America. Remember, the term for putting an area under military law enforcement control is precise; the term is "martial law." Section 1076 of the massive Authorization Act, which grants the Pentagon another $500-plus-billion for its ill-advised adventures, is entitled, "Use of the Armed Forces in Major Public Emergencies." Section 333, "Major public emergencies; interference with State and Federal law" states that "the President may employ the armed forces, including the National Guard in Federal service, to restore public order and enforce the laws of the United States when, as a result of a natural disaster, epidemic, or other serious public health emergency, terrorist attack or incident, or other condition in any State or possession of the United States, the President determines that domestic violence has occurred to such an extent that the constituted authorities of the State or possession are incapable of ("refuse" or "fail" in) maintaining public order, "in order to suppress, in any State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy." For the current President, "enforcement of the laws to restore public order" means to commandeer guardsmen from any state, over the objections of local governmental, military and local police entities; ship them off to another state; conscript them in a law enforcement mode; and set them loose against "disorderly" citizenry - protesters, possibly, or those who object to forced vaccinations and quarantines in the event of a bio-terror event. The law also facilitates militarized police round-ups and detention of protesters, so called "illegal aliens," "potential terrorists" and other "undesirables" for detention in facilities already contracted for and under construction by Halliburton. That's right. Under the cover of a trumped-up "immigration emergency" and the frenzied militarization of the southern border, detention camps are being constructed right under our noses, camps designed for anyone who resists the foreign and domestic agenda of the Bush administration. An article on "recent contract awards" in a recent issue of the slick, insider "Journal of Counterterrorism & Homeland Security International" reported that "global engineering and technical services powerhouse KBR [Kellog, Brown & Root] announced in January 2006 that its Government and Infrastructure division was awarded an Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract to support U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facilities in the event of an emergency." "With a maximum total value of $385 million over a five year term," the report notes, "the contract is to be executed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers," "for establishing temporary detention and processing capabilities to augment existing ICE Detention and Removal Operations (DRO) - in the event of an emergency influx of immigrants into the U.S., or to support the rapid development of new programs." The report points out that "KBR is the engineering and construction subsidiary of Halliburton." (3) So, in addition to authorizing another $532.8 billion for the Pentagon, including a $70-billion "supplemental provision" which covers the cost of the ongoing, mad military maneuvers in Iraq, Afghanistan, and other places, the new law, signed by the president in a private White House ceremony, further collapses the historic divide between the police and the military: a tell-tale sign of a rapidly consolidating police state in America, all accomplished amidst ongoing U.S. imperial pretensions of global domination, sold to an "emergency managed" and seemingly willfully gullible public as a "global war on terrorism." Make no mistake about it: the de-facto repeal of the Posse Comitatus Act (PCA) is an ominous assault on American democratic tradition and jurisprudence. The 1878 Act, which reads, "Whoever, except in cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress, willfully uses any part of the Army or Air Force as a posse comitatus or otherwise to execute the laws shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both," is the only U.S. criminal statute that outlaws military operations directed against the American people under the cover of 'law enforcement.' As such, it has been the best protection we've had against the power-hungry intentions of an unscrupulous and reckless executive, an executive intent on using force to enforce its will. Unfortunately, this past week, the president dealt posse comitatus, along with American democracy, a near fatal blow. Consequently, it will take an aroused citizenry to undo the damage wrought by this horrendous act, part and parcel, as we have seen, of a long train of abuses and outrages perpetrated by this authoritarian administration. Despite the unprecedented and shocking nature of this act, there has been no outcry in the American media, and little reaction from our elected officials in Congress. On September 19th, a lone Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vermont) noted that 2007's Defense Authorization Act contained a "widely opposed provision to allow the President more control over the National Guard [adopting] changes to the Insurrection Act, which will make it easier for this or any future President to use the military to restore domestic order WITHOUT the consent of the nation's governors." Senator Leahy went on to stress that, "we certainly do not need to make it easier for Presidents to declare martial law. Invoking the Insurrection Act and using the military for law enforcement activities goes against some of the central tenets of our democracy. One can easily envision governors and mayors in charge of an emergency having to constantly look over their shoulders while someone who has never visited their communities gives the orders." A few weeks later, on the 29th of September, Leahy entered into the Congressional Record that he had "grave reservations about certain provisions of the fiscal Year 2007 Defense Authorization Bill Conference Report," the language of which, he said, "subverts solid, longstanding posse comitatus statutes that limit the military's involvement in law enforcement, thereby making it easier for the President to declare martial law." This had been "slipped in," Leahy said, "as a rider with little study," while "other congressional committees with jurisdiction over these matters had no chance to comment, let alone hold hearings on, these proposals." In a telling bit of understatement, the Senator from Vermont noted that "the implications of changing the (Posse Comitatus) Act are enormous". "There is good reason," he said, "for the constructive friction in existing law when it comes to martial law declarations. Using the military for law enforcement goes against one of the founding tenets of our democracy. We fail our Constitution, neglecting the rights of the States, when we make it easier for the President to declare martial law and trample on local and state sovereignty." Senator Leahy's final ruminations: "Since hearing word a couple of weeks ago that this outcome was likely, I have wondered how Congress could have gotten to this point. It seems the changes to the Insurrection Act have survived the Conference because the Pentagon and the White House want it." The historic and ominous re-writing of the Insurrection Act, accomplished in the dead of night, which gives Bush the legal authority to declare martial law, is now an accomplished fact. The Pentagon, as one might expect, plays an even more direct role in martial law operations. Title XIV of the new law, entitled, "Homeland Defense Technology Transfer Legislative Provisions," authorizes "the Secretary of Defense to create a Homeland Defense Technology Transfer Consortium to improve the effectiveness of the Department of Defense (DOD) processes for identifying and deploying relevant DOD technology to federal, State, and local first responders." In other words, the law facilitates the "transfer" of the newest in so-called "crowd control" technology and other weaponry designed to suppress dissent from the Pentagon to local militarized police units. The new law builds on and further codifies earlier "technology transfer" agreements, specifically the 1995 DOD-Justice Department memorandum of agreement achieved back during the Clinton-Reno regime.(4) It has become clear in recent months that a critical mass of the American people have seen through the lies of the Bush administration; with the president's polls at an historic low, growing resistance to the war Iraq, and the Democrats likely to take back the Congress in mid-term elections, the Bush administration is on the ropes. And so it is particularly worrying that President Bush has seen fit, at this juncture to, in effect, declare himself dictator. Source: (1) http://leahy.senate.gov/press/200609/091906a.html and http://leahy.senate.gov/press/200609/092906b.html See also, Congressional Research Service Report for Congress, "The Use of Federal Troops for Disaster Assistance: Legal Issues," by Jennifer K. Elsea, Legislative Attorney, August 14, 2006 (2) http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill+h109-5122 (3) Journal of Counterterrorism & Homeland Security International, "Recent Contract Awards", Summer 2006, Vol.12, No.2, pg.8; See also, Peter Dale Scott, "Homeland Security Contracts for Vast New Detention Camps," New American Media, January 31, 2006. (4) "Technology Transfer from defense: Concealed Weapons Detection", National Institute of Justice Journal, No 229, August, 1995, pp.42-43. Photo source: http://sandiego.indymedia.org/images/2005/08/110478.jpg http://duggmirror.com/politics/Bush_Moves_Toward_Martial_Law_2/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lord_casek Posted October 31, 2006 Author Share Posted October 31, 2006 oh fuck. can a mod please move this to crossfire? had two windows open. my mistake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iloveboxcars Posted October 31, 2006 Share Posted October 31, 2006 yes! finally when i leave my house i will have escorts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lord_casek Posted October 31, 2006 Author Share Posted October 31, 2006 yes! finally when i leave my house i will have escorts. i like to think of them as "bodyguards". it just won't feel the same when everyone else has them. thanks mamerrro. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angelofdeath Posted October 31, 2006 Share Posted October 31, 2006 papers comrade? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Qawee Posted October 31, 2006 Share Posted October 31, 2006 Source(s)? Specifically on the detention centers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lord_casek Posted October 31, 2006 Author Share Posted October 31, 2006 http://news.pacificnews.org/news/view_article.html?article_id=eed74d9d44c30493706fe03f4c9b3a77 http://www.mindfully.org/Reform/2006/Halliburton-Detention-Camps31jan06.htm http://www.infowars.com/articles/ps/halliburton_dention_camps_for_political_subversives.htm http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article12078.htm i'm sure you can find the rest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fermentor666 Posted November 1, 2006 Share Posted November 1, 2006 Gsdgafdjoiwejrflkjsdfsd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smart Posted November 2, 2006 Share Posted November 2, 2006 No way a such monumental revocation of state's rights is gonna fly. At all. Ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angelofdeath Posted November 2, 2006 Share Posted November 2, 2006 they have been saying that since 1789, Smart. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smart Posted November 2, 2006 Share Posted November 2, 2006 and yet here we are... 200 years later, still enjoying local and state legislation without fedral interference for the most part... if you don't count slavery, integration, the federally mandated speed limit and those recent disturbing changes to the imminent domain laws. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lord_casek Posted November 2, 2006 Author Share Posted November 2, 2006 too late, it's law Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smart Posted November 2, 2006 Share Posted November 2, 2006 It's also law that you can't get a fish drunk in St. Louis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angelofdeath Posted November 2, 2006 Share Posted November 2, 2006 and yet here we are... 200 years later, still enjoying local and state legislation without fedral interference for the most part... if you don't count slavery, integration, the federally mandated speed limit and those recent disturbing changes to the imminent domain laws. not really... the feds were only supposed to be involved in the strict ENUMERATED powers expressly defined in the article 1. not all the stuff they are involved in now. but yeah, its not like we are ruled by a dictator... yet. but bushchev is getting close. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lord_casek Posted November 2, 2006 Author Share Posted November 2, 2006 well, now AOD, that just isn't patriotic is it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lord_casek Posted November 2, 2006 Author Share Posted November 2, 2006 http://www.crooksandliars.com/2006/11/01/olbermanns-special-comment-there-is-no-line-this-president-has-not-crossed-nor-will-not-cross-to-keep-one-political-party-in-power/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HardyHarHar Posted November 4, 2006 Share Posted November 4, 2006 http://www.crooksandliars.com/2006/11/01/olbermanns-special-comment-there-is-no-line-this-president-has-not-crossed-nor-will-not-cross-to-keep-one-political-party-in-power/ That was beautiful Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fermentor666 Posted November 7, 2006 Share Posted November 7, 2006 casek the link is dead for this article and I need to e-mail it to someone, can you find it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fermentor666 Posted November 7, 2006 Share Posted November 7, 2006 Wait, here it is: http://miami.indymedia.org/news/2006/10/6319.php That duggmirror site would be good if it had a fucking search option. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lord_casek Posted November 7, 2006 Author Share Posted November 7, 2006 casek the link is dead for this article and I need to e-mail it to someone, can you find it? that duggmirror link isn't dead. just email them the actual bill. i'll see if i can do some looking around in the meantime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visiting Posted November 8, 2006 Share Posted November 8, 2006 Does anyone ever wonder about the big wall they are building on the mexican border may be used to keep us in, instead of keeping others out? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lord_casek Posted November 8, 2006 Author Share Posted November 8, 2006 Does anyone ever wonder about the big wall they are building on the mexican border may be used to keep us in, instead of keeping others out? haha. that 1.? billion is going towards repairs, not a "new" wall. just fixing the same old crappy one we've always. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
isor357 Posted November 26, 2006 Share Posted November 26, 2006 In the patriot act alone theres enough on paper that the government could legally turn America into a police state. Now the insurrection act... When the time comes there will be a legal transition to authoritarian rule. I wouldnt be the least bit surprised if there wasn't an attack on america by the american government to usher in the changes. Blamed on our enemies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lord_casek Posted November 27, 2006 Author Share Posted November 27, 2006 In the patriot act alone theres enough on paper that the government could legally turn America into a police state. Now the insurrection act... When the time comes there will be a legal transition to authoritarian rule. I wouldnt be the least bit surprised if there wasn't an attack on america by the american government to usher in the changes. Blamed on our enemies. false flag terrorism seems to be the trend these days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fermentor666 Posted November 28, 2006 Share Posted November 28, 2006 What kills me is the possibility of being prohibited from discussing the existence of God. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.