Removed Posted May 3, 2009 Share Posted May 3, 2009 all im getting is other peoples opinions.[/color][/b] Unless you are a forensic expert or an engineer, that's all you're going to get. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lord_casek Posted May 3, 2009 Author Share Posted May 3, 2009 http://www.ae911truth.org/ architects and engineers bentham open chemical physics journal, peer reviewed paper on thermite found in wtc dust http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00000001/7TOCPJ.SGM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dreaken1993 Posted May 12, 2009 Share Posted May 12, 2009 3 reasons 911 was a inside job 1. Norad- dick chenney takes command of Norad a month before 911 when there has never been a vp do that before. Dick orders norad to stand down when he was warned in adequate that planes had been hijacked and does not let commanders do there job. Norad said prior to 911 that thye monitered us air space 24/7 after 911 they said that they would start to moniter us air space wtf 2. thermite- active thermite causing intense fire in the basement of the wtc weeks after collapse 3. free fall speed- never before has a building as tall as wtc 1 2 fall from fire and never at free fall speed, and wtc was built to withstand colliding with 2 planes like the ones that struck it also second plane hitting the towers is fake 1. there is no space for the video to be taken seeing as the only space that had that view was covered by trees and had no way of seeing it 2. news stations reporting it live taped 2 different versions of the explosions -one should a plane hitting it - the other different alex jones - i think alex jones is there to distract people from the real perportrators and the runners of the NWO ie the vatican,the jesuits, and the zionist - he screams his ideas on people in ways that makes them scared of him and reinforce the ideas that all conspiracy scientists are crazy - he uses words that make you think of no one in particular like NWO and global elitest and thus people again think hes crazy he gives good info but dosent use it right, he only reports half truths, and brags too much i think if he was a real truther he would be dead by now just like william cooper Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
troubador406 Posted May 21, 2009 Share Posted May 21, 2009 I think investors rule the world, thats all of them, because without their money, companies wouldnt do the weird things they do. All hail investors and their philosophies that individually and combined shape our country. Now that i got that off my chest, I think im gonna go invest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lord_casek Posted May 21, 2009 Author Share Posted May 21, 2009 bankers. investors are the suckers they can scam out of money. berney madoff.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
troubador406 Posted May 21, 2009 Share Posted May 21, 2009 Thats partly true, but dont you think that big time investors have a strong say in what the company does? example. if we expand the north sector it will hurt bill in the south who donates 1 million a year but it will make vern in the north, our 10 million a month investor, twice as rich and twice as likely to invest more... All Im saying is that money talks, and investors fuel these businesses , and without the big investors that pump millions into the companies, they would fail. Theyre too big to succeed on their own Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
troubador406 Posted May 21, 2009 Share Posted May 21, 2009 im pretty sure bankers can invest too.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lord_casek Posted May 21, 2009 Author Share Posted May 21, 2009 Thats partly true, but dont you think that big time investors have a strong say in what the company does? example. if we expand the north sector it will hurt bill in the south who donates 1 million a year but it will make vern in the north, our 10 million a month investor, twice as rich and twice as likely to invest more... All Im saying is that money talks, and investors fuel these businesses , and without the big investors that pump millions into the companies, they would fail. Theyre too big to succeed on their own no. investors are only part of it. a small part. international bankers are truly the rulers of the world. the people you never hear of... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
troubador406 Posted May 21, 2009 Share Posted May 21, 2009 Yea that seems to be the train of thought since zeitgeist... idk though, ima keep my ears and eyes open Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lord_casek Posted May 21, 2009 Author Share Posted May 21, 2009 Yea that seems to be the train of thought since zeitgeist... idk though, ima keep my ears and eyes open fuck a zeitgeist. check out "confessions of an economic hitman" or read transcripts from cfr meetings. again, fucka zeitgesit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lord_casek Posted August 2, 2009 Author Share Posted August 2, 2009 Ryland: A Sibel Edmonds 'Bombshell' - Bin Laden Worked for U.S. Until 9/11 http://www.bradblog.com/?p=7332 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Ginger Bread Man Posted September 14, 2009 Share Posted September 14, 2009 so apparently bin laden WAS responsible for 9/11? http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090914/ap_on_re_mi_ea/ml_bin_laden_tape "The delay in your knowing those causes has cost you a lot without any result whatsoever," he said. "This position of yours, combined with some other injustices, pushed us to undertake the events of (Sept. 11)." WTF is going on here? is yahoo spreading some propaganda? didnt know where else to put this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LEVEL 75 PALADIN Posted September 14, 2009 Share Posted September 14, 2009 A new Bin Laden tape! Is it my birthday? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keso cheese Posted September 15, 2009 Share Posted September 15, 2009 I think Bin Laden denied the 9/11 attacks at first and now he claims them. He's just another stool pigeon of Bush. They needed a boogieman and now they have one. But the Bush's and the Bin Ladens go way back. No way that Al Queda brought down the twin towers by themselves. The i-beams in those buildings were cut by thermite. Ive never heard of the I-beams being cut by thermite. how would they have done that with all those people working in there? not hating, just have never heard that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LEVEL 75 PALADIN Posted September 15, 2009 Share Posted September 15, 2009 I think that planes flew into the wtc. That might have had something to do with them falling down dunno. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anker. Posted September 16, 2009 Share Posted September 16, 2009 I concur with the paladin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keso cheese Posted September 16, 2009 Share Posted September 16, 2009 You haven't read this thread? The I-beams were cut at 45 degree angles just like in a professional demolition. That's why the world trade center towers pretty much collapsed on their own footprints. It would have been easy for a professional team to do. Just dress up like maintainence workers and go to work. If you think that's fishy try to explain what knocked down tower 7. Nothing! It was demolished. They even said they demolished it on the news. No plane flew into it or nothing. Besides, these buildings were built to withstand a plane crash by the architect. Not only that but look into the insurance plan taken out by the owner of the WTC days before the attack. Or the security team assigned to the towers days before the attack. I could go on and on. But you would do well to read this thread before posting in here again. That's what this thread is about after all. like I said I dont know about he I-beams being cut, and people say that the building is meant to withstand a plane hitting it? really? a standard 767 weights 205,000 pounds empty, that's no fuel, passangers, food carts, luggage and so forth. now take 205,000 pounds fly it at 350 mph into concrete and steel. nothing on earth would survive that kind of hit. not to mention the thousands of gallons of jet fuel burning at a minimum of 800 degrees Fahrenheit, which would cause the steal to lose half its structural integrity within minutes. Im not saying its not a conspiracy but I just dont believe in the bomb theory or the theory they cut the I-beams. I saw a picture of WTC 7 before the whole conspiracy hype and it looked like it had been scooped out at the bottom. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
topaz Posted September 16, 2009 Share Posted September 16, 2009 I'm an engineering student and have studied the collapse through many different viewpoints as a part of my studies, and always end up at the same conclusion. I think there is more to the story then we have been lead to believe. Now I'm not making any judgments or extrapolating anything from what's out there, everyone has the right to make make their own minds up about it. But it would seem to me, to deny the existence of there being more than a few funky bits of evidence is quite naive. Something I've learned is that if it doesn't seem to make sense, or doesn't add up, you're generally right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keso cheese Posted September 16, 2009 Share Posted September 16, 2009 yeah im not saying its not a conspiracy, there are still things I have questions about but I also think some of the "evidence" is kinda out there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fastZeetec302 Posted September 22, 2009 Share Posted September 22, 2009 I think that planes flew into the wtc. That might have had something to do with them falling down dunno. end thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lord_casek Posted September 22, 2009 Author Share Posted September 22, 2009 like I said I dont know about he I-beams being cut, and people say that the building is meant to withstand a plane hitting it? really? a standard 767 weights 205,000 pounds empty, that's no fuel, passangers, food carts, luggage and so forth. now take 205,000 pounds fly it at 350 mph into concrete and steel. nothing on earth would survive that kind of hit. not to mention the thousands of gallons of jet fuel burning at a minimum of 800 degrees Fahrenheit, which would cause the steal to lose half its structural integrity within minutes. Im not saying its not a conspiracy but I just dont believe in the bomb theory or the theory they cut the I-beams. I saw a picture of WTC 7 before the whole conspiracy hype and it looked like it had been scooped out at the bottom. You weren't looking at 7. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keso cheese Posted September 22, 2009 Share Posted September 22, 2009 maybe not, it look like a sort of triangular building but I dont read up a lot on 9/11. I do think it was a conspiracy but like I said some of the claims are a little ridiculous but it makes sense why they would have done it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lord_casek Posted September 22, 2009 Author Share Posted September 22, 2009 maybe not, it look like a sort of triangular building but I dont read up a lot on 9/11. I do think it was a conspiracy but like I said some of the claims are a little ridiculous but it makes sense why they would have done it. Take a look at some demolition vids on youtube or whatever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keso cheese Posted September 22, 2009 Share Posted September 22, 2009 Ok so I looked into some of the videos and WTC 7 is definitely fishy, I do remember hearing about that on the news that it had been demolished (I guess thats the proper word). Not trying to change the subject but do you have any good links for government-polluted vaccines? cant seem to find one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ILOTSMYBRAIN Posted February 24, 2010 Share Posted February 24, 2010 http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/feb/22/inside-the-beltway-70128635/?feat=home_columns Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ILOTSMYBRAIN Posted February 26, 2010 Share Posted February 26, 2010 http://www.vdare.com/roberts/100225_armageddon.htm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baron Von Counterculture Posted March 1, 2010 Share Posted March 1, 2010 http://www.structuremag.org/Archives/2007-11/SF-WTC7-Gilsanz-Nov07.pdf A more developed explanation of what MAY have happened to "fishy" 7.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lord_casek Posted March 1, 2010 Author Share Posted March 1, 2010 http://www.structuremag.org/Archives/2007-11/SF-WTC7-Gilsanz-Nov07.pdf A more developed explanation of what MAY have happened to "fishy" 7.... Over 1,000 architects and engineers disagree Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fastZeetec302 Posted March 1, 2010 Share Posted March 1, 2010 thermite paint! i was a navy seal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twonpoo Posted March 1, 2010 Share Posted March 1, 2010 Yeah like the passports of the hijackers mysteriously falling out of the sky unscathed, or some of the hijackers turning up alive in other countries. The whole thing reeks of conspiracy at the highest levels! this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.