BIGBLUE Posted July 23, 2003 Share Posted July 23, 2003 So we all know the Knicks are trash .But recently they made the biggest trash decision in the world. The trade between three ,possibly four teams that sent Latrell Sprewell packing. Yes he need to go ,either him or Alan Houston. But dammit get something of value in return . Through all of the shuffling of players they end up with Keith VanHorn .. What do you think of that . Did it make sense ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NOUM Posted July 23, 2003 Share Posted July 23, 2003 I hate basketball.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
awkward eye Posted July 23, 2003 Share Posted July 23, 2003 no,it didnt make sense,im a blazer fan and i would have traded you BONZI for SPREE....good luck with van horn,and McDyess...:lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i11igul Posted July 23, 2003 Share Posted July 23, 2003 Cavaliers are goin all the way baybee but yah that was a shitty decision, i think lakers killed on trades this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StarzAbove Posted July 23, 2003 Share Posted July 23, 2003 Knicks still Wack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crave Posted July 23, 2003 Share Posted July 23, 2003 the east is lacking in the comp department. although i hate to admit it, the lakers are gonna be stacked this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JUDONO? Posted July 23, 2003 Share Posted July 23, 2003 LAKERS=THE NEW DREAM TEAM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nomadawhat Posted July 23, 2003 Share Posted July 23, 2003 van horn is weak..... hopefully mcdyess will get better, ...maybe they will make the playoff though... but pistons and nets will battle for the east again. lakers are going to be fun to watch...if the kobe case turns out all good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weapon X Posted July 23, 2003 Share Posted July 23, 2003 Originally posted by BIGBLUE So we all know the Knicks are trash .But recently they made the biggest trash decision in the world. The trade between three ,possibly four teams that sent Latrell Sprewell packing. Yes he need to go ,either him or Alan Houston. But dammit get something of value in return . Through all of the shuffling of players they end up with Keith VanHorn .. What do you think of that . Did it make sense ? i thought it was just a proposed trade? It went through? I do not like this deal one bit. Van Horn compared to Latrell? Puhleeze. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unconscience Posted July 23, 2003 Share Posted July 23, 2003 i hear P.Diddy is trying to buy a piece of the team. but he's not gotten any feedback yet. what does everyone think about THAT.;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mapo returns Posted July 23, 2003 Share Posted July 23, 2003 Van Horn is a good player. Im a diehard Sixer fan so I saw him last season and Im sad to see him go. However, I like the idea of Glenn Robinson in a Sixer jersey. Good shit. The Knicks arent able to trade Houston because he makes too much money for what he does, he is grossly overpaid and nobody wants to take on that contract. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
awkward eye Posted July 23, 2003 Share Posted July 23, 2003 i heard atlanta may pull out of the deal...anyone else hear this?dude van horn is an overrated over paid player,if you got big dawg for nothing 76ers would be getting a steal... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mapo returns Posted July 23, 2003 Share Posted July 23, 2003 Van Horn is a good player. Im looking at his stats now.. hes good for 7.5 rebound per game, shoots 83% from the line, 17.7 points per game. however, for a 6-10 forward he should be getting more than .59 blocks per game. hes definitely too soft on defense. and he is overpaid. but he is still an asset to a team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BIGBLUE Posted July 23, 2003 Author Share Posted July 23, 2003 awkward eye no,it didnt make sense,im a blazer fan and i would have traded you BONZI for SPREE....good luck with van horn,and McDyess... NOW THAT WOULD BE SWEET.. MY DREAM TRADE WOULD HAVE BEEN LA,CLIPPERS GUARD LAMAR ODOM FOR SPREEWELL.. HE WOULD HAVE BEEN ABLE to play small forward and be an impact and fans attraction Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nomadawhat Posted July 23, 2003 Share Posted July 23, 2003 Originally posted by mapo returns Van Horn is a good player. Im looking at his stats now.. hes good for 7.5 rebound per game, shoots 83% from the line, 17.7 points per game. however, for a 6-10 forward he should be getting more than .59 blocks per game. hes definitely too soft on defense. and he is overpaid. but he is still an asset to a team. during the season, but he looked scared and played ineffective most of the playoffs i thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Born Loser Posted July 23, 2003 Share Posted July 23, 2003 DA BEARS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FratGuyJoe Posted July 23, 2003 Share Posted July 23, 2003 i didn't mind van horn here, but glenn in sixers jersey would be sweet:cool: a legit scorer other a.i. would help us out a bunch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr_president Posted July 23, 2003 Share Posted July 23, 2003 the knicks play like this: fight and hurt people first goal. then try to win the game. :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.