Jump to content

OH SNAP..WERE ALL GOING TO DIE!!

DAVAK

By DAVAK
in Channel Zero

Recommended Posts

This forum is supported by the 12ozProphet Shop, so go buy a shirt and help support!
This forum is brought to you by the 12ozProphet Shop.
This forum is brought to you by the 12oz Shop.
lord_casek

lord_casek

Posted
Posted
T;6039623']How do you think it lost power anyway, i just had this conversation last night about this satellite probably being zapped by one of our enemies as an experiment if in war they would have the ability to drop all our satellites. How often dos a satellite just fall from the sky.

 

On a side note anyone read about that meteorite that was supposed to come close to us the 28th or some shit.

 

there are some new directed energy weapons already out and some really neat ones in development by the DoD via DARPA.

 

 

 

http://www.darpa.mil/tto/Programs/hellads.htm

http://www.rinf.com/news/sep-2005/23.html

http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/army/docs/astmp/c4/P4K.htm

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest shai_hulud

Guest shai_hulud

Posted
Posted

It would figure if some government jackoff decided to cut the part of the budget that goes towards satellite telemetry and spent the money on fake tits for his girlfriend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest shai_hulud

Guest shai_hulud

Posted
Posted

Telemetry keeps satellites from crashing into tits.

 

This is like that argument from "The Breakfast Club"-

 

"Without math, there would be no engineering."

 

"Without engineering, there would be no light."

 

Or something like that. I have to agree though, tits make my day far more enjoyable than telemetry does...but you know, I'd probably miss telemetry a lot if it suddenly went away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...
IOU

IOU

Posted
Posted

WASHINGTON — President Bush decided to make a first-of-its-kind attempt to use a missile to bring down a broken U.S. spy satellite because of the potential danger to people from its rocket fuel, officials said Thursday.

 

Deputy National Security Adviser James Jeffries, briefing reporters at the Pentagon, did not say when the attempted intercept would be conducted, but the satellite is expected to hit Earth during the first week of March.

 

"This is all about trying to reduce the danger to human beings," Jeffries said.

 

Gen. James Cartwright, vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said at the same briefing that the "window of opportunity" for such a shootdown, presumably to be launched from a Navy ship, will open in the next three or four days and last for seven or eight days. He did not say whether the Pentagon has decided on an exact launch date.

 

Cartwright said this will be an unprecedented effort; he would not say exactly what are the odds of success.

 

"This is the first time we've used a tactical missile to engage a spacecraft," Cartwright said.

 

After extensive study and analysis, U.S. officials came to the conclusion that, "we're better off taking the attempt than not," Cartwright said.

 

He said a Navy missile known as Standard Missile 3 would be fired in an attempt to intercept the satellite just prior to it re-entering Earth's atmosphere. It would be "next to impossible" to hit the satellite after that because of atmospheric disturbances, Cartwright said.

 

A second goal, he said, is to directly hit the fuel tank in order to minimize the amount of fuel that returns to Earth.

 

Software associated with the Standard Missile 3 has been modified to enhance the chances of the missile's sensors recognizing that the satellite is its target; he noted that the missile normally is used to shoot down ballistic missiles, not satellites.

 

"It's a one-time deal," Cartwright said when asked whether the modified Standard Missile 3 should be considered a new U.S. anti-satellite weapon technology.

 

Cartwright also said that if an initial shootdown attempt fails, a decision will be made whether to take a second shot.

 

Jeffries said members of Congress were briefed on the plan earlier Thursday and that diplomatic notifications to other countries would be made before the end of the day.

 

Shooting down a satellite is particularly sensitive because of the controversy surrounding China's anti-satellite test last year, when Beijing shot down one of its defunct weather satellites, drawing immediate criticism from the U.S. and other countries.

 

A key concern at that time was the debris created by Chinese satellite's destruction _ and that will also be a focus now, as the U.S. determines exactly when and under what circumstances to shoot down its errant satellite.

 

The military will have to choose a time and a location that will avoid to the greatest degree any damage to other satellites in the sky. Also, there is the possibility that large pieces could remain, and either stay in orbit where they can collide with other satellites or possibly fall to Earth.

 

It is not known where the satellite will hit. But officials familiar with the situation say about half of the 5,000-pound spacecraft is expected to survive its blazing descent through the atmosphere and will scatter debris _ some of it potentially hazardous _ over several hundred miles. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter.

 

The satellite is outfitted with thrusters _ small engines used to position it in space. They contain the toxic rocket fuel hydrazine, which can cause harm to anyone who contacts it. Officials have said there is about 1,000 pounds of propellent on the satellite.

 

Known by its military designation US 193, the satellite was launched in December 2006. It lost power and its central computer failed almost immediately afterward, leaving it uncontrollable. It carried a sophisticated and secret imaging sensor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...