theprotester

Post some? Realistically, post one.

He should have thrown tinned ham

Spiderman homecoming Was shit

Yo but have your heard of immortal technique

Would love to watch that.

Waiting on dinner date The pro is ALWAYS on time.

Do you mean inanimate? A hammer is designed to drive nails into board, a gun is designed to drive bullets into people. Hth http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-10-06/vegas-shooter-investigators-puzzled-believe-he-was-not-alone-two-reasons

You could not kill 59 people with a hammer and a rock.

Also if you have trouble quietening your mind sensory dep tanks might be a massive waste of 100 bucks!

The only thing beyond meditation is enlightenment

Yarns at 2 wheel wreckers is real nice. Tempted to stop.

They were shook about the Poms.

Yeah you've added words to my conclusion. My conclusion is that the gun buyback program (I'm a licenced gun owner just don't have one) has made the chances of a mass murder by a gunman much much lower. Also, my observation based purely on reality, is that since the buyback there has been zero mass shootings in Australia. Before it there was 13 in an 18 year period.

Basically you can find enough information and data to back any narrative that makes you feel comfortable. At the end of the day I believe the necessity to have a gun is a product of a life based in fear. All I do is continue to be grateful that I live in the lucky country.

Thanks for the report. I've started my free trial.

Yo schnitty

I got my info from live eye witness stuff on the news. I'm twelve hours in front so I'd just sat down to lunch when it popped off. How accurate that is is anybodies guess

Raven I have literally no idea why you started talking about a nightclub I was talking about the massacre from Monday. That's where cops waived their supreme court protected right to run away from the scene and instead piled on top of people to try and shield them from gunfire. As even if they had a rocket launcher on their hip they had no idea where the bullets were coming from.

Lol Hua don't start me on suicide. I'd 100% be dead right now if I owned a gun over the last ten years.

If you're going to say we're treating this as a terror attack, why wouldn't laws change? How many laws changed after the 911 attacks? Is it exactly as easy to pass through airports as before? Or are certain freedoms now pinched because of it? 1715 people have been killed in what is deemed mass Shooting in the past five years in America.

It's just the price of the American version of freedom.

The cops piled on people to save them. They did not run away like you said they're allowed to do under the supreme court decision you brought up. So they waived their supreme court protected right to flee the scene in an attempt to save lives. I

Also at the end of the day the NRA has the house at the moment so this is a moot point.

Definitely concede to your point re the French terror attack. Foreign nationals inflicting a terror attack somehow feels different to me.

Yeah no point continuing this. You can wall up that text as much as you like you won't change my perception of the facts. Australia had about 15 mass shootings in the 20 years leading up to the last one. Then the laws changed. Haven't had one since. Whether this applies to America not I don't really care, but it doesn't matter what metric, or imperial if you must, that you use - people stopped dying.