ykattack Posted October 19, 2010 Share Posted October 19, 2010 lmao. they can't do their jobs so they rely on the public. if Horne gas time to paint topto bottom on 30 trains for pictures alone what's gonna stop a dude from duct taping explosives to 30 trains with time to spare for 40 virgins? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mind617 Posted October 19, 2010 Share Posted October 19, 2010 ykae brings up a good point, whats been bothering me about this whole thing is saftey....we all know out of the faces shown, how REALLY gets up...and i feel like puttin they're faces out there just made them tagets, fuckin vigilantes n shit, they dont know who got beef with who...and im not even speaing about graff. beef, that shit is second real beef comes 1st and best believe if something happens to one of them dudes, niggas is suing...shit they should sue for slander, and defimation of character, cause they are all tagerts now to the crazy weirdos that take shit too far.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mind617 Posted October 19, 2010 Share Posted October 19, 2010 ps theyre all "wanted" for these supposed crimes , nut niggas is innocent till proven guilty Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MayorMeanBeans Posted October 19, 2010 Share Posted October 19, 2010 those boston herald articles are very poorly researched articles that would never meet the standards of a legit newspaper (an article about 'judges' cracking down with only quotes and info from Officer O'Loughlin, without a single source/quote from a single judge, and refers to cases almost two years old to prove that judges are just starting to crack down 'now'). the fact that nancy o'loughlin and her co-worker are the only sources in almost 4 articles about graffiti (minus the go-to graffiti basher, the back bay lady) means that more than anything else, theyre at risk of losing whatever budget they had, especially in the midst of declining tax revenues, so they go out and create a crisis in cohoots with everyone's favorite neighborhood retard, the Boston Herald Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ralph rock Posted October 20, 2010 Share Posted October 20, 2010 Yes!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mountain dew Posted October 20, 2010 Share Posted October 20, 2010 ps theyre all "wanted" for these supposed crimes , nut niggas is innocent till proven guilty Exactly, it is all alleged. Which is why their photos should never be posted.How often do you see alleged sex offenders with warrants out on the front page? Especially if from another state? The article was poorly written, and poorly researched. There is another article posted as of this morning, again of the "35" caught in the past 5 years, this article mentions 4 that did time. I don't want to post a link and put alleged names on blast, but you all know how to search stuff. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BADBREATH Posted October 20, 2010 Share Posted October 20, 2010 sounds like defamation of character to me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freakeenyc Posted October 20, 2010 Share Posted October 20, 2010 Richard Weir wrote the articles...it says he covers "T" related stories. Richard Weir Independent Writing and Editing Professional Writing and Editing | Greater New York City Area Current: City Hall reporter at Boston Herald Past: Staff Writer at New York Daily News, freelance writer at The New York Times Education: Columbia University - Graduate School of Journalism, Clark University Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Veritably Clean Posted October 20, 2010 Share Posted October 20, 2010 lol dude's not even from here, fuckin dickhead Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wisogee Posted October 20, 2010 Share Posted October 20, 2010 some labels i found figured id show em 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wisogee Posted October 20, 2010 Share Posted October 20, 2010 funny read http://www.mook-life.com/all-city-chilleur-boston-2/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Shake Posted October 21, 2010 Share Posted October 21, 2010 "dotbostoneagle ? +29 Good Comment -4 Poor Comment This is more than vandalism; it is a major security problem. How are these people able to gain access to the trains and then have enough time to deface them? Isn’t anyone worried that a terrorist might do something with more grave consequences? What happens if a bomb were attached to the train rather than spray paint? Where is the T security? When these trains are parked for the night, no one should have access. Nobody spray paints a plane at Logan, is the safety of the T riders less important? Also, the T bridge over the Neponset River is tagged. If vandals have easy access to the bridge, who is protecting the T infrastructure from potential attack?" damn, good idea yo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maviK_ Posted October 21, 2010 Share Posted October 21, 2010 society is a joke Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dr.nick Posted October 21, 2010 Share Posted October 21, 2010 graffiti cop = waste of a life Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ActingStupid Posted October 22, 2010 Share Posted October 22, 2010 love this I wrote this in the last article at the end of the day, but I think it is worth bumping to the beginning of this article: its a shame that more of the commenters don't see this as a pretty shoddy attempt at inflating a crisis to get more tax dollars. If you look around in the streets, there is less new graffiti than ever. Nancy O'Loughlin took the reporter to a place that she and others have more or less tolerated as a graffiti-zone for more than 20 years, the [uneducated] reporter looks at and thinks to himself, "oh my goddd its out of control" when in reality he was probably looking at some stuff that was probably a couple of years old at least. Also, anyone truly outraged by this should take a look at the ages of those wanted presently, and those arrested. Apart from the two out-of-towners which actually were arrested at the same time [aka, one case], all of them are in their early 20s. Compare that with some of the other high profile cases from a couple years ago where those arrested were in their late 20s and given relatively significant jail sentences. Considering that O'Loughlin et. al. are now going after those in their early 20s, I imagine that their careers [and damage] has nowhere near been as dramatic as those previously. And to hear her say, "O’Loughlin said she’s witnessing the most graffiti damage since the mid to late ’80s, referring to the era when graffiti “bombin’” hit Boston — about a decade after it turned the Big Apple’s subways into moving murals of brightly-colored bubble letters that symbolized 1970’s urban decay." Is just completely bogus. And is a shameful scare tactic to exact more money for the police budget. Just going through a LexisNexis search of boston graffiti, you can find comments on graffiti, each of which say, "this is the biggest ever" In a 1999 article in the Boston Herald, referring to an arrest of three individuals, State Police Sgt. David Benoit said, ""These are the three biggest vandals, as a crew, that we have gotten together," he said. "I can think of very few others who have done so much damage." If they were so bad then, why wouldn't O'Loughlin refer to them rather than going all the way back to the 80s? Nancy O'Loughlin, in 1994, ""I have a feeling it's going to be a pretty active summer between the painting and the violence associated with it."" (Didn't pan out, scare tactics on the eve of turning graffiti into a felony crime, punishable by up to three years in prison)In a 1993 Boston Herald article, O'Loughlin also said, ""One of these days," she says, "you're gonna find one of these kids dead with a can stuffed down his throat." [again, did not pan out] And, the SHINING point that O'Loughlin and Kelley are full of BS is this quote, again from the May 29th, 1994 edition of the Boston Herald: "T officials estimate Bogart and other graffiti vandals cause several million dollars' worth of damage to the system each year." OK - several million dollars a year back in 1994, 500,000 dollars a year today. AND TODAY IS THE MOST GRAFFITI SHE'S SEEN SINCE THE 1980s???? Needless to say, I am surprised that the writer of this article did not check his facts against those of previous articles written on the subject in this very same paper. Especially considering Nancy O'Loughlin's long time tendencies to fear-monger.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freakeenyc Posted October 22, 2010 Share Posted October 22, 2010 homie worked for the Daily News in ny before.....which is notorious for being garbage/and outrageous. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2501 Posted October 22, 2010 Share Posted October 22, 2010 3 related stories this week... the last one they bagged one kid because *get this it sounds like a joke* his probation officer read the Herald and found out he had warrants. WTF FIRE THAT INCOMPETENT ASS P.O. that's just laughable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LastBoyScout Posted October 22, 2010 Share Posted October 22, 2010 that article should have been about how the system is so fucked and nancy is so incompetent that a kid can be reporting to a po and still none of the cops can track him down to serve him but instead its a self congratulatory pat on the back i guess that incompetence is better for us in the long run 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freakeenyc Posted October 22, 2010 Share Posted October 22, 2010 feeelin the stickers take...esp the 2nd and 4th ones. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Earthworm Jim Posted October 22, 2010 Share Posted October 22, 2010 It must kill that incompetent bitch to know that so many people will be crushing this city after her haggard ass is dead. I cant wait until she goes, I'll do a nice flared "CUNT" handstyle on her tombstone. She been at it a long time. Lot of us are just getting started. Pigs like her are a rare breed, but writers come by the bus-full. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mind617 Posted October 22, 2010 Share Posted October 22, 2010 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wisogee Posted October 22, 2010 Share Posted October 22, 2010 i gotta say i like how that came out mynd^ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maviK_ Posted October 22, 2010 Share Posted October 22, 2010 she won't be dead for like at least 15 years i don't think.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MayorMeanBeans Posted October 22, 2010 Share Posted October 22, 2010 love this I wrote this in the last article at the end of the day, but I think it is worth bumping to the beginning of this article: its a shame that more of the commenters don't see this as a pretty shoddy attempt at inflating a crisis to get more tax dollars. If you look around in the streets, there is less new graffiti than ever. Nancy O'Loughlin took the reporter to a place that she and others have more or less tolerated as a graffiti-zone for more than 20 years, the [uneducated] reporter looks at and thinks to himself, "oh my goddd its out of control" when in reality he was probably looking at some stuff that was probably a couple of years old at least. Also, anyone truly outraged by this should take a look at the ages of those wanted presently, and those arrested. Apart from the two out-of-towners which actually were arrested at the same time [aka, one case], all of them are in their early 20s. Compare that with some of the other high profile cases from a couple years ago where those arrested were in their late 20s and given relatively significant jail sentences. Considering that O'Loughlin et. al. are now going after those in their early 20s, I imagine that their careers [and damage] has nowhere near been as dramatic as those previously. And to hear her say, "O’Loughlin said she’s witnessing the most graffiti damage since the mid to late ’80s, referring to the era when graffiti “bombin’” hit Boston — about a decade after it turned the Big Apple’s subways into moving murals of brightly-colored bubble letters that symbolized 1970’s urban decay." Is just completely bogus. And is a shameful scare tactic to exact more money for the police budget. Just going through a LexisNexis search of boston graffiti, you can find comments on graffiti, each of which say, "this is the biggest ever" In a 1999 article in the Boston Herald, referring to an arrest of three individuals, State Police Sgt. David Benoit said, ""These are the three biggest vandals, as a crew, that we have gotten together," he said. "I can think of very few others who have done so much damage." If they were so bad then, why wouldn't O'Loughlin refer to them rather than going all the way back to the 80s? Nancy O'Loughlin, in 1994, ""I have a feeling it's going to be a pretty active summer between the painting and the violence associated with it."" (Didn't pan out, scare tactics on the eve of turning graffiti into a felony crime, punishable by up to three years in prison)In a 1993 Boston Herald article, O'Loughlin also said, ""One of these days," she says, "you're gonna find one of these kids dead with a can stuffed down his throat." [again, did not pan out] And, the SHINING point that O'Loughlin and Kelley are full of BS is this quote, again from the May 29th, 1994 edition of the Boston Herald: "T officials estimate Bogart and other graffiti vandals cause several million dollars' worth of damage to the system each year." OK - several million dollars a year back in 1994, 500,000 dollars a year today. AND TODAY IS THE MOST GRAFFITI SHE'S SEEN SINCE THE 1980s???? Needless to say, I am surprised that the writer of this article did not check his facts against those of previous articles written on the subject in this very same paper. Especially considering Nancy O'Loughlin's long time tendencies to fear-monger.. i love the fact that so many people gave it the "thumbs down", despite there being hardly any opinions (except for calling nancy a fearmonger). people don't like anything that goes against their simple worldviews: COPS = GOOD, TAGGERS = BAD and there can never ever ever be any greys in between. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Shake Posted October 22, 2010 Share Posted October 22, 2010 that mind is great Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dr.nick Posted October 22, 2010 Share Posted October 22, 2010 good idea jim. we can wait Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wrok Posted October 23, 2010 Share Posted October 23, 2010 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skage Posted October 23, 2010 Share Posted October 23, 2010 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maviK_ Posted October 23, 2010 Share Posted October 23, 2010 follow the rules Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PurpleDrank Posted October 23, 2010 Share Posted October 23, 2010 goes... yerp Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.