lord_casek Posted August 17, 2007 Share Posted August 17, 2007 kennedy assassination http://abcnews.go.com/sections/wnt/US/JFK_poll_031116.html http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,102511,00.html disprove the thermate? not likely. those small hollow metal globules.... the chemical combinations...disprove those Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CILONE/SK Posted August 17, 2007 Author Share Posted August 17, 2007 This thread got stupid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Theo Huxtable. Posted August 17, 2007 Share Posted August 17, 2007 name 5 conspiracy theories i believe in. i challenge you. are you serious? too easy. 9/11 inside job kennedy assasination inside job holographic matrix-like universe virginia tech shooter under the CIA's mind control 1993 wtc bombing inside job Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DRUNKEN-ASSHOLE-ONER Posted August 17, 2007 Share Posted August 17, 2007 They weren't debunked. Please explain how the fuck was there explosions from fire in building 7 when nothing even happened to building 7? There's video footage of windows popping out in an upward fashion one after another then the shit comes down like a controlled implosion. How the fuck are you argueing against what firefighters and witnesses who were actually there saw. Espescially when it's doccumented on video. You can clearly see it. You people are just thick headed and STUPID! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lord_casek Posted August 17, 2007 Share Posted August 17, 2007 are you serious? too easy. 1993 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Theo Huxtable. Posted August 17, 2007 Share Posted August 17, 2007 They weren't debunked. Please explain how the fuck was there explosions from fire in building 7 when nothing even happened to building 7? There's video footage of windows popping out in an upward fashion one after another then the shit comes down like a controlled implosion. How the fuck are you argueing against what firefighters and witnesses who were actually there saw. Espescially when it's doccumented on video. You can clearly see it. You people are just thick headed and STUPID! Wow you really have not read both sides of the story at all. Otherwise you'd at least know the explanations for building 7. Something DID happen to building 7. Tower 2 and especially Tower 1 collapsed on to them, raining tons of debris into its south face, creating a 20-story gash in the building that was 25% deep. This can be seen on countless video, of Tower 1 especially dropping on to building 7's south face. There were fuel generators on various floors which caught on fire. You obviously studied nothing about the structural integrity of building 7 or of towers 1 and 2. 1 & 2 had revolutionary designs for skyscrapers, in which the primary support structures were the beams that ran along the outside of the building, and not a cobweb design of concrete-protected steel beams that run throughout the interior of the building in most traditional skyscrapers. Had the WTC's been built with the latter design, it would have probably survived. You say I'm arguing against what a few "firefighters" and "witnesses" saw. Yet, you ignore the fact that the majority of firefighters and policemen and rescue workers will tell you building 7 collapsed because it was expected to collapse due to its severe structural damage. Secondly, these witnesses and firefighters don't say it was an "inside job" -- they say it was a strange day with many strange coincidences. They say they heard explosions. They use metaphors and similes when emotions are running high and people cannot think clearly -- "it looked like one of those planned demolitions," and "it was like a cruise missle [that hit the pentagon].". I too would've thought it was a strange day if I was there at the scene that day. I would have blurted out metaphors to describe what I saw in the heat of the moment. In fact I did think it was strange even though I was about 8,000 miles away in another country when it happened. People react on impulse and base their observations on emotion during high-tense situations. It's apparent that you don't research both sides of the story and it's no wonder you're viewing it all with tunnel vision. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAR Posted August 17, 2007 Share Posted August 17, 2007 It's apparent that you don't research both sides of the story and it's no wonder you're viewing it all with tunnel vision. This pretty much sums up the whole thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lord_casek Posted August 17, 2007 Share Posted August 17, 2007 dear fermentor: no police state? http://kurtnimmo.com/?p=953 http://www.keepandbeararms.com/newsarchives/XcNewsPlus.asp?cmd=view&articleid=2126 http://www.virginianewssource.com/images/VATerrorismManual.pdf "In an August 3rd article, contributing editor and philosopher Philip Atkinson penned a feverish diatribe that calls for the end of democracy, for Bush to be made ruler of the world as Julius Caesar was made emperor of Rome, for Bush to be made lifetime President in the U.S., and for Iraq to be ethnically cleansed by means of nuclear genocide and re-populated with Americans. The comments are so fundamentally sick and twisted that the reader must absorb the following passages in full to recognize the true depravity of what the Neo-Con fringe truly embrace. After calling democracy 'the enemy of truth and justice', Atkinson openly calls for genocide and mass slaughter. The simple truth that modern weapons now mean a nation must practice genocide or commit suicide. Israel provides the perfect example. If the Israelis do not raze Iran, the Iranians will fulfill their boast and wipe Israel off the face of the earth. The wisest course would have been for President Bush to use his nuclear weapons to slaughter Iraqis until they complied with his demands, or until they were all dead. He then cites Julius Caesar, the reviled dictator of the Roman Empire, as an example of how Bush should engage in rampant ethnic cleansing. When the ancient Roman general Julius Caesar was struggling to conquer ancient Gaul, he not only had to defeat the Gauls, but he also had to defeat his political enemies in Rome who would destroy him the moment his tenure as consul (president) ended. Caesar pacified Gaul by mass slaughter; he then used his successful army to crush all political opposition at home and establish himself as permanent ruler of ancient Rome. If President Bush copied Julius Caesar by ordering his army to empty Iraq of Arabs and repopulate the country with Americans, he would achieve immediate results: popularity with his military; enrichment of America by converting an Arabian Iraq into an American Iraq (therefore turning it from a liability to an asset); and boost American prestiege while terrifying American enemies. Atkinson then concludes by stating such actions would allow Bush to declare martial law, become permanent President of the U.S. and eventually ruler of the entire world. He could then follow Caesar's example and use his newfound popularity with the military to wield military power to become the first permanent president of America, and end the civil chaos caused by the continually squabbling Congress and the out-of-control Supreme Court. President Bush can fail in his duty to himself, his country, and his God, by becoming “ex-president” Bush or he can become “President-for-Life” Bush: the conqueror of Iraq, who brings sense to the Congress and sanity to the Supreme Court. Then who would be able to stop Bush from emulating Augustus Caesar and becoming ruler of the world? For only an America united under one ruler has the power to save humanity from the threat of a new Dark Age wrought by terrorists armed with nuclear weapons. " http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:cnnnSRimWmcJ:www.familysecuritymatters.org/index.php?id=1208571%2B%22president%2Bfor%2Blife%2Bbush%22%2Bsite:familysecuritymatters.org&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=3&gl=us&client=firefox-a Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lord_casek Posted August 17, 2007 Share Posted August 17, 2007 This pretty much sums up the whole thread. http://www.wtc7.net/damageclaims.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAR Posted August 17, 2007 Share Posted August 17, 2007 LOL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lord_casek Posted August 17, 2007 Share Posted August 17, 2007 are you serious? too easy. 9/11 inside job kennedy assasination inside job holographic matrix-like universe virginia tech shooter under the CIA's mind control 1993 wtc bombing inside job p.s.: the holographic universe theory is getting more attention these days. i wouldn't call it a conspiracy theory, either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DRUNKEN-ASSHOLE-ONER Posted August 17, 2007 Share Posted August 17, 2007 http://www.wtc7.net/damageclaims.html ^Enough said. But obviously you're just a thick headed idiot with "tunnel vision" who refuses to accept reality. (Theo) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lord_casek Posted August 17, 2007 Share Posted August 17, 2007 i often wonder why theo won't tell us what he is studying to become? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Mamerro Posted August 17, 2007 Share Posted August 17, 2007 This thread got so stupid and strayed so ridiculously off course it no longer needs to stay open. There's other threads available for all the fragmented discussions going on now. Closed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.