the district

haha, i like your earthy tones... i put a border n mine and it made the front tree pop out, i was like whoa. its still not professional but its getting there.

photo by: chr7s - http://www.deviantart.com rezist in baltimore

...please elaborate how more mega pixels loses quality.are you speaking about shrinking for flickr or photobucket. i have a 9 mp and i can see how much poorer a 6 is...i wnat the new 14 mp nikon, and then shoot the same with a cheap film for the extreme high def.

alls i hear is nikon nikon nikon...i would never buy a 6 mp at this point.just save for more mp's...i would only buy nikon, i hear canon's break easier and a few other negatives. but i guess its whatever. I appreciate the comments from a couple pages back guys. aight ...peace...

strange fruit by billie holiday

e stoled from deviantart .... estoled from flickr. dont think ive seen the panomerge yet...

nice t rexxx... the man peeking and the small green plant popped the most fr me, maybe it was the greens...

stolen from a flickr random stolen from flickr "wouldpkr"

im saying people who always write clean as opposed to a dirty style, it says something about your personality, but this is over a long period large scale. If a clean writer writes dirty ne night maybe they were a lil intoxicated or under more pressure or what have you. If you paint a self portrait of yourself in a dirty manner as opposed to a clean representation either you view yourself as dirty, your under alot of stress or you are a dirty person. If you paint it in a clean manner you either see yourself in a pure manner, you are clean and elegant or you are very anal about details. i understand reputable psychologists put it down but maybe its not so much who you are before you wrote the message but more so of who you will be after you write the message.

http://www.quackwatch.com/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/Tests/grapho.html of course "the barnum effect" applies if we are trying to decipher exact facts and small lil things...--- 1. Graphological effects are too small to have been reliably observed. 2. Graphological features are too numerous to be reliably combined. 3. Assessment of the match between graphology and the person suffers from too many biases to allow valid lets look at the 10 most popular serial killers writing and the 10 most popular physicists writing... and in relation to 2789... how about vision maps?

I love to learn so tell me what you know. What about symbols writers use, i.e. three dots, underlining and stars encircled. Could it be possible there is a formula there telling us something about that writer?

i don't know where you are getting your information? because its in admissable in court? with a 92% forgery accuracy and a 70% personality accuracy. i can not find anything proving it wrong , or "bullshit"... in the one article straight dope it said 52%...yet we do not know the control. Really it is not as bad as astrology. The control and variables are so flexible as in psychology science expierments that its hard to nail down. But to call it complete bullshit is far stretching.

does anyone know the name of the guy or camera that is like gamma and xrays but you can see an aura of energy around a leaf for up to 15minutes after it has been taken away from its sitting point?

Keep at it casek, respect... Its hard to display ones view with the chance that you could be wrong. Of course everyones gonna say conspiracy theorists are "crazy". Its easy to agree with the majority... Someone has to ask questions though, or how much more power would they have if we didn't ?...

Not so much a circle, but a spiral...

http://www.straightdope.com/columns/030418.html

http://www.handwritinginsights.com/lesson.html

By changing the way you sign your name, write letters and yes, write graffiti, you can change your personality... The question is, is once hand writing analysis is understood on a larger scale by more writers how or will it affect graffiti types? exp... writing downward will fade due to the fact it is representing your life "going down hill"... http://www.handwriting.org/archives/99may_01.html