Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

dignan

Members
  • Content Count

    1,174
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

dignan last won the day on May 9 2004

dignan had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

33 Good

About dignan

  • Rank
    Senior Member
  1. dignan

    RIP Nekst

  2. dignan

    RIP Nekst

    Damn, damn, damn. Payers out to his family. R.I.P.
  3. dignan

    The Nonsense thread

    thank you for enlightening me to the gift of pranic nourishment
  4. dignan

    weed heads/kings by trade!

    big cheat and rich
  5. dignan

    SMASH OR TRASH?

    ^^trash bikini bitch
  6. dignan

    SMASH OR TRASH?

    ^^yeah, smash
  7. dignan

    SMASH OR TRASH?

    and I just can't stop laughing at this last one...
  8. dignan

    SMASH OR TRASH?

    smash massgraff's post
  9. dignan

    SMASH OR TRASH?

    ^^smash, why not
  10. dignan

    SMASH OR TRASH?

    ((female))
  11. dignan

    Freewill / Determinism

    In the beginning of the last paragraph of that two page PDF you linked to, Bostrom writes: "If we are in a simulation, could ever know for certain? If the simulators don’t want us to find out, we probably never will. But if they choose to reveal themselves, they could certainly do so." So, I understand this as the author saying we (scientists, physicists and the like) can't prove this is a simulation from our end. Without that top-down revelation, I think the most we could get is an accidently true belief...which is short of knowledge (which may also depend on if we could agree on what knowledge would entail). It's a fun thing to think about, and it makes me wish I knew more about Philosophy of Mind.
×