1. Welcome to the 12ozProphet Forum...
    You are currently logged out and viewing our forum as a guest which only allows limited access to our discussions, photos and other forum features. If you are a 12ozProphet Member please login to get the full experience.

    If you are not a 12ozProphet Member, please take a moment to register to gain full access to our website and all of its features. As a 12ozProphet Member you will be able to post comments, start discussions, communicate privately with other members and access members-only content. Registration is fast, simple and free, so join today and be a part of the largest and longest running Graffiti, Art, Style & Culture forum online.

    Please note, if you are a 12ozProphet Member and are locked out of your account, you can recover your account using the 'lost password' link in the login form. If you no longer have access to the email you registered with, please email us at info@12ozprophet.com and we'll help you recover your account. Welcome to the 12ozProphet Forum (and don't forget to follow @12ozprophet in Instagram)!

The Camera Thread

Discussion in 'Art & Design' started by JJC, Nov 8, 2005.

  1. JJC

    JJC 12oz Junior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2004
    Messages:
    137

    The Camera Thread

    Discussion started by JJC - Nov 8, 2005

    Well with the popularity of the photography thread, I've noticed that a lot of people are getting interested in buying a DSLR. (If you don't know what a DSLR is, or are unsure of the advantages of it, I suggest you check out www.kenrockwell.com > how to> The two classes of digital cameras. direct link if you don't want to check out the rest of his site.

    What I'm trying to say is, the camera you use doesn't really matter. If you have a magic lens that fits every camera in the world, the pictures you take from Nikon's flagship pro-dslr the D2X will be no different than a whatever Konica Minolta budget dslr. Megapixels don't matter unless you plan on making huge prints. This is even more so with film cameras, my 19 yr-old manual nikon FE will give exactly the same results as the F6.

    "what I'm trying to say is, the camera you use doesn't really matter..."
    But the lens attached to the camera does. Sharpness, color/contrast, distortion, depth of field and shutterspeeds all depend on the lens. Which is why pros that shoot Nikon and Canon use their camera brand lenses instead of thirdparty stuff from Sigma/Tokina/etc. (Those are the 2 giants in the slr business, though pentax/olympus makes great lenses too). The important part is that you stick with your camera brand lenses. It's because they've been making lenses specifically for their camera systems since forever and know what they're doing as opposed to thirdparty manufacturers mixing and matching their mounts.

    My camera(s) Nikon d70, Nikon FE circa 1986
    lens: 18-70 f/3.5-4.5 af
    50 f/1.8 af
    80-200 f/2.8 af
    85 f/1.4 af

    Hope I help.
     
    JJC - Rank: 12oz Junior Member - Messages:
    137
    - Joined:
    Oct 8, 2004
  2. WeakSauce

    WeakSauce Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2004
    Messages:
    610

    WeakSauce - Replied Nov 9, 2005

    I dont really know shit about lenses, but I'm looking to get the nikon d70, and the lens that comes with it is the 18-70mm AF-S DX f/3.5-4.5G IF-ED. Is this a good lens for just multipurpose shots; details, long range, night shots? or should I look for a better one?
     
    WeakSauce - Rank: Banned - Messages:
    610
    - Joined:
    Oct 20, 2004
  3. JJC

    JJC 12oz Junior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2004
    Messages:
    137

    JJC - Replied Nov 9, 2005

    The D70 is an incredible camera.
    The 18-70 is what you're looking for- it's sharp, it's wide (the 18mm end is pretty much as wide as you can get other than the the 12-24 or some crazy fisheye/specialty lens for upwards of a grand). You're fine with night shots as long as you have a tripod, If you find yourself in dim light, and the 4.5 isn't fast enough for you? crank that iso up to 1600, it'll still be very usable.

    But if you can wait a bit, say around, till the end of the year, I'd say go for the D200. (I'm getting one myself) It's a league ahead of the D70 with a bigger af motor, buttons dedicated to ISO/Quality/WB, and an optional vertical grip that's very important to me. And a programmable button that should be very useful for quick AF override or flash control. You get that, and an extra 5 megapixels for 700 more. definitely worth it I think.
     
    JJC - Rank: 12oz Junior Member - Messages:
    137
    - Joined:
    Oct 8, 2004
  4. Ckit

    Ckit 12oz Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2003
    Messages:
    725

    Ckit - Replied Nov 9, 2005

    great info, but i would have to disagree on one point. In film cameras, the camera itself, in terms of image quality matters very little. The handling, ease of use, specs and build quality would be how to choose. WIth digital however, the camera has a huge role. In addition to the qualities needed in film. other things factor in also. If you ever compare 3mp cameras to 6mp ones you will see an amazing difference. same as if you compare 6mp dslrs to 14mp ones. also, many of these cameras have variations in the colors they produce. most high end ones can be programed to give you close to what you want, but some may not.

    eh.

    i have
    F100
    FE2
    50mm 1.8 af
    24mm 2.8
    75-150mm 3.5
    35-70mm 2.8 af (soon!)
     
    Ckit - Rank: 12oz Member - Messages:
    725
    - Joined:
    Mar 10, 2003
  5. thecarwreck

    thecarwreck 12oz Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2003
    Messages:
    1,006

    thecarwreck - Replied Nov 9, 2005

    i generally agree with the majority so far. the lenses ARE important, but you can do 75% of your shooting with a mediium length zoom.., that's why the 18-70 is ideal. i have an 80-300 that i use maybe once a month for sneaky candids or soemthing. PopPhoto had a good article on lens selection a while back...download A PDF of it.

    my d70 is the fucking joint and the image quality--even with less-than-high-end lenses--is dope. the whole megapixel thing is useless anymore unless you're shooting as a professional. the 14mp canon is essentially going to give you the same results as the 6mp nikon... unless you're printing HUGE images. i did a 24"x40" pring (RAW, sent to the printer as a 300dpi PDF) and that was 90% perfect.

    there is a significant difference in point-and-shoot digis and DSLR though. just like 35mm, it makes a difference. so when Ckit says the 3mp and the 6mp are worlds apart, it only really goes with the point-and-shoot... to a degree. i'm so not about all the tech shit though. i've seen the illest photos come from fucking pinhole cameras... images that crush the $12,000 digital medium format shit. it's like anything else: your equipment should reflect your ability. it's like buying some expensive european paint and expecting to be a good graffiti writer... or getting the best setup in the skateshop and thinking that'll make you a good skater... all the same shit. if you suck, you suck. practice makes you good, not the equipment.

    JJC: the d200 is going to be pretty sick. that whole vertical grip thing though, you can get one that pops onto the d70 for like $10 (check freestyle photo supply). the individual buttons will be nice though, that push-and-turn shit is annoying in fast-shooting situations.
     
    thecarwreck - Rank: 12oz Senior Member - Messages:
    1,006
    - Joined:
    May 14, 2003
  6. -Rage-

    -Rage- 12oz Loyalist

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    Messages:
    10,006

    -Rage- - Replied Nov 9, 2005

    carwreck, I have to ask...
    When you shoot are your raw images naturally that satrurated or is that a small tweek after uploading to your computer?
     
    -Rage- - Rank: 12oz Loyalist - Messages:
    10,006
    - Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
  7. thecarwreck

    thecarwreck 12oz Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2003
    Messages:
    1,006

    thecarwreck - Replied Nov 9, 2005

    what i shot at the steel was the largest jpeg setting, 'fine'. it produces a 10x6 300dpi file. the color is 99% original to the intial file... that's because the d70 offers not only custom color saturation settings (mine's on 'high'), but also various shooting modes (portrait, night, action, etc) that each have an inherent color profile. the 'landscape' mode makes greens pop, the macro makes reds, and so on. the only photoshop work i do is for contrast (PS7 has some weird muddying in the transfer) and cropping. occasionally i'll get into color correction if the lighting is all fucked (i.e. sodium or florescent). but i try to shoot an original that's as close to the actual colors as possible.

    so i guess it's the camera doing a little tweaking more than anything... but i feel like that's the equivalent of shooting really saturated film like velvia or kodachrome in 35mm...


    *edit... i just reread that and realized just how nerdy it sounds.
     
    thecarwreck - Rank: 12oz Senior Member - Messages:
    1,006
    - Joined:
    May 14, 2003
  8. JJC

    JJC 12oz Junior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2004
    Messages:
    137

    JJC - Replied Nov 9, 2005

    Right, there's NO visible difference between 6mp and 12 when you're making prints 9x11 or less. But yes, D70 is 'da joint', no two ways about it. Only thing I want more from it is faster AF speed, more FPS, a vertical grip, and WB/ISO/QUAL buttons, and a programmable free button. Oh wait... I want a d200.
     
    JJC - Rank: 12oz Junior Member - Messages:
    137
    - Joined:
    Oct 8, 2004
  9. WeakSauce

    WeakSauce Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2004
    Messages:
    610

    WeakSauce - Replied Nov 15, 2005

    Thanks for answering my question in depth JJC thats exactly what I needed to know. And as far as the d200 goes, it sounds great but I can barely afford the d70 right now. let alone another $700. Thanks again though you've helped a lot.
     
    WeakSauce - Rank: Banned - Messages:
    610
    - Joined:
    Oct 20, 2004
  10. JJC

    JJC 12oz Junior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2004
    Messages:
    137

    JJC - Replied Dec 7, 2005

    I'm looking to get into medium format. Anyone here have experience in that field? Gear/format advice would be mega appreciated.
     
    JJC - Rank: 12oz Junior Member - Messages:
    137
    - Joined:
    Oct 8, 2004
  11. imported_Tesseract - Replied Dec 8, 2005

    I would only buy sony's and panasonic's cause they carry ZEISS and LEICA lenses. Fuck that nikon, canon crap
     
  12. BURLAP

    BURLAP 12oz Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2004
    Messages:
    307

    BURLAP - Replied Dec 8, 2005

    i shoot med. format, but on a holga. not somethin' i'd recommend since it's made
    of plastic, has a plastic lens and light leaks etc. plus it's one of the trendiest goddamn
    camera's on the planet.
    my dad has a huge mother of a med. format camera, a real nice one, but the name of
    it is drawing a blank. hopefully i'll be shooting with this thing by the end of the year.
     
    BURLAP - Rank: 12oz Member - Messages:
    307
    - Joined:
    Jul 29, 2004
  13. coffeedependency

    coffeedependency 12oz Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2004
    Messages:
    1,202

    coffeedependency - Replied Dec 8, 2005

    it doesn't really matter anymore, all their stuff is made in china.
    besides that, their cameras are weak. the lenses are a gimmick.
     
    coffeedependency - Rank: 12oz Senior Member - Messages:
    1,202
    - Joined:
    Oct 8, 2004
  14. FunTimePartyTeam

    FunTimePartyTeam 12oz Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2005
    Messages:
    2,029

    FunTimePartyTeam - Replied Dec 8, 2005

    Speaking of where theyre made... Ive been looking into getting a D70S and from what I'm finding the 'good' lenses and cameras are american made, where there is sort of knock off versions coming out of China. Has anyone else run into this? And how do I tell them apart (does it say)?
     
    FunTimePartyTeam - Rank: 12oz Senior Member - Messages:
    2,029
    - Joined:
    Apr 19, 2005
  15. Ckit

    Ckit 12oz Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2003
    Messages:
    725

    Ckit - Replied Dec 8, 2005

    check out pentax MF. nothing but quality.
     
    Ckit - Rank: 12oz Member - Messages:
    725
    - Joined:
    Mar 10, 2003