HIGH&TIGHT

Re: Drunk cop runs over 11 yr old girl, 2 officers charged in cover up, still found not gu wait a sec...maybe i missed something "important" a long time ago, but is that really DAO in that telegraph article??

"FIVE STAR NIGGAS" the real fun starts at 1:35 /yeshomo

ok i'm sorry i can't let this go. REALLY? is this a serious quesion dude? first of all it's apples & oranges buddy. both of you are totally biased & you hypothesize based on idle speculation. there's plenty of research out there. how about...find & read some of it? but since i'd hate to see you spend any more time mulling over this super lame comparison, here's your answer: they're both pretty fucking harmless...i feel like you guys are arguing over breakfast cereal or something...this thread would be so much better if it was a tweaker & a crackhead stabbing eachother's faces over whose drug of choice is worse-est.

errrrmmmmmm. jus do duster br0 its like n between da 2

Also, has anybody else noticed that the UK seems to churn out more "news" articles on "recent studies" related to illegal drugs than any other country in the world, by far?

'zackly. I'm constantly seeing articles about some "new study" on illegal drugs and their effects, and the consensus is always changing. Alot of these "studies" turn out to be half-assed/use highly flawed methods if you dig a little deeper into them. It's also good to know who the "scientists" referred to in the article are (government-employed, university, etc.) as that can lend some insight into possible biases/ conflicts of interest/ flaws in research. Not to mention the fact that journalists will often miscontstrue the studies' methods, its findings, and the scientists' quotes, rendering their own articles virtually useless. I don't know if this "spin" is intentional or not (I'm sure it depends on the journalist) but there've been many times when I read an article where scientists were quoted directly, and then the journalist goes on to "recap" or "elaborate" and it doesn't even add up with what was quoted...kinda makes me embarassed for em almost. /yesblazed

i'm not even gonna try to get into genres here, but i've been stucks on these lately: OOMP CAMP - GET EM 3-6 MAFIA - GOTTA TOUCH EM GANGSTA PAT - SMOKE SOMETHIN DOLAMITE - HUSTLAS UNLV - HIKE PAPERCLIP PEOPLE - COUNTRY BOY GOES DUB A GUY CALLED GERALD - FEEL THE HEAT CAJMERE - HORNY LENNY DEE - JUST AS LONG AS I GOT YOU SALEM - REDLIGHTS SALEM - TRAPDOOR SALEM - DIRT SEWN LEATHER - SMOKE OV THA PVNK DIRTY CRIMINALS - DIAS CORTAS DIRTY CRIMINALS - BATTERIES NOT INCLUDED DIRTY CRIMINALS - JAK DA BOX HOLY GHOST - AGENTS AT THE DOOR MIKE DEARBORN - DESTRUCTION MIKE DEARBORN - HORROR THOMAS CHROME - BURN RUBBER BURN

Re: a tranny is giving me a handjob right fucking now!!! "BUTCH FEMME QUEEN"

Re: a tranny is giving me a handjob right fucking now!!! coke + booze + marines = not a party

nah, i'm a nerd but definitely not of that caliber.

yeah, i've heard stuff about dirpy & virus risks or whatever but i'm on a mac so i forget these things, hence the lack of a warning.

for serious. i have no idea how i did not find out about it sooner

dirpy.com

i retained very little regarding this discussion of the porn non-issue. however, i very badly want to barbecue that family on the 1st page in their own backyard. carry on.

Re: a tranny is giving me a handjob right fucking now!!! i never understood the cocaine hype. wait, yeah i did, and pretty well at that, but then i realized how much funner ecstasy, shrooms & pharmaceutical amphetamines are. now coke just reminds me of slackjawed butterface sorority cunts with no personalities who never stop talking about nothing. in other words i don't know you twinky but you can probably do better. toot is for queefs.

Re: a tranny is giving me a handjob right fucking now!!! all you fools calling dow "gay" are too funny. my guess (and this is a conservative estimate), is that half of y'all would go AT LEAST as far as he did, assuming the circumstances were right (she looked like a "real" girl, you knew nobody would find out). let's get you guys educated real quick: im a big gay fag. no seriously i am. as in, i am a dude and i do stuff with dudes on the regular. the thought of getting it on with a girl does not appeal to me in any way shape or form. i'm just not "wired" that way. whatever. so let's say i run into a female-to-male tranny at a bar. he's got a shaved head, totally bearded man face, hairy, tatted-up man chest (no tits), man voice, etc. he completely looks like a dude, but he has a vagina. oh and he's bi, too. so i'm all horned up & i have no other prospects. i'm feeling adventurous and i end up getting head from him. does that suddenly make me straight? i mean, i'm a genetic male, and he was born with a vagina, which he still has, so....yeah, by your logic i'd be 100% hetero. now see how dumb you are?