ILOTSMYBRAIN

No, I could careless about YOU and what YOU think. I rationally explain everything, you just don't agree with it, which is fine. I also think it has to do with the fact that you aren't educated in Libertarian philospohy, so when you hear the approach you deny it because you don't fully understand how it would play out. I've explained his foreign policy, and why it works, you say he's a isolationist and that's not how America should run, again because you don't fully grasp what RP wants to do in foreign policy, he doesn't want to ignore the rest of the world (which is what the left and even right think) he would rather trade and talk to all nations than apply sanctions, and all avenues of military action. I've talked about his monetary policy and how that would work, you think government bailouts and oversight is how it should be done, I pointed out that oversight was there and has been there, and they didn't see anything, you think the solution is more of this, I think that this is a mistake all together. I've also talked about Abortion and other social issue's. You bring up his newsletters and his opposition to the Civil Rights Act of 64. To basically say he's a racist, when even black colleagues of his know this isn't true, you still think it is. It's because we disagree fundamentally on how government should run, we won't agree, you will deny any of this works. I don't understand why your presence is so large in a thread that supports idea's that you clearly will never agree with. You remind me of the MSM and how they attack the guy, it's just at least their getting paid.

No, I could careless about YOU and what YOU think. I rationally explain everthing, you just don't agree with it, which is fine. I also think it has to do with the fact that you aren't educated in Libertarian philosphy, so when you hear the approach you deny it because you don't fully understand how it would play out. I've explained his foreign policy, and why it works, you say he's a isolationist and that's not how America should run, again because you don't fully grasp what RP wants to do in foreign policy, he doesn't want to ignore the rest of the world (which is what the left and even right think) he would rather trade and talk to all nations than apply sanctions, and all avenues of military action. I've talked about his monetary policy and how that would work, you think government bailouts and oversight is how it should be done, I pointed out that oversight was there and has been there, and they didn't see anything, you think the solution is more of this, I think that this is a mistake all together. I've also talked about Abortion and other social issue's. You bring up his newsletters and his opposition to the Civil Rights Act of 64. To basically say he's a racist, when even black colleagues of his know this isn't true, you still think it is. It's because we disagree fundamentally on how government should run, we won't agree, you will deny any of this works. I don't understand why your presence is so large in a thread that supports idea's that you clearly will never agree with. You remind me of the MSM and how they attack the guy, it's just at least their getting paid.

Bump that Distort on that trailer.

The thing is, you dictate what is "reality" and what isn't. This game is unplayable and rigged. It is fun to play sometimes, but it gets old quick. That's the problem. You refuse to answer question's, you only demand question's to be answered, and when they are you deny the answers and demand more answer's. See the insanity in this? No, I didn't think so.

When all you do is troll and your not even good at it, you got problems.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eD_ybaXhXno Wizard boom.

NVM

The stat's aren't THAT BAD, but you are right it is still less, on average. I thought the numbers improved more. http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1983185,00.html To jump in on your question to Frank, private organizations can take this role. Also this is about federal government, if States themselves decide to jump in on the issue that is something else all together.

Mad? Why do you keep calling me mad? This is entertainment for me, I've had a few days off from work, so I can chill out. I back up his policies on their own merit. I bring up his voting record, and defend from the knowledge that I have his stances from what I understand of the Liberterian perspective. It's not hard, I've done it this entire thread. I already addressed this regulation issue, you disagree, that's fine, move on. I can't appease you of something you don't agree with and I'm not going to change your mind, so in my opinion, you should compare what you believe as opposed to what I believe. SO I propose instead of listing a candidate that you support, just explain how regulation works better, explain regulations role in our current economic situation, and how more regulation will save us in the future.

RP didn't want to go to Afghanistan or Iraq and predicted this financial mess we are in. He wouldn't have made these mistakes, and didn't vote for them in the REAL WORLD. Show me a scenario where whoever you support because well, you've never mentioned it once, will make this country better, will change the perception of America all over the world. Will take us out of this horrendous debt we are in, who will give the bill of rights and constitution back to the people, and who would end the empire ASAP. You can't, you won't, and it'll never happen. So the real question is, what is wrong with me to engage with you in this debate that isn't a debate and would never end, even if RP won the nomination, became president and everything I think could happen, does.

Why are capable women thrown into this mix? Pretty sure on average women are making more money and are graduating at higher rates. Libertarian philosophy can't make up for cultural or social biases that people may have. If society isn't ready to view such people as equal's is the law is going to change this? Perhaps on paper, but...

Mad? No. I just don't understand how you can't answer a question and are constantly on the attack. Chill, answer a question and this will continue to be a conversation not an interview, where we answer your questions from your biased loaded questions. RP isn't my messiah, I do not think of him as a demigod or anything of the sort. It's just basic philosophy on how to handle government. The free market stuff is explained over and over again, read a book. It is not my job to convince you of what is right and wrong, obviously your opinion is opposite, so now DEFEND YOUR POSITION. I have done so, this entire thread.

That's right because you don't answer the question's you give em.

Mek that last one is brilliant!

And no other candidate uses this tactic? Watch a GOP debate, and listen to what is said when they speak about foreign policy, and listen to who isn't jumping on the bandwagon. He is simply painting a picture of our monetary policy if we do no change it. Do I think RP's predictions or scenario's are more likely than all other candidates on monetary policy at this point? Yes. He's been pretty accurate so far.

lol @ the faces.

Cruzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz!

You think that's what that commercial represents? I don't.

NO. I want the Federal Reserve to cease to exist, and I want a president who will select a better group of people to surround himself with to get things done. I also want laws to be enforced and people who conduct bad business to go out of business, and those who commit fraud should go to prison instead of being propped up reinstated, and allowed to conduct the behavior they have over several decades. Laws that were put into place were taken away, I already said this, the people who regulated knew what was going on and did nothing, you can't grasp this fact. If the laws that were on the books were being enforced, and the so called regulators you depend on actually did their job, we wouldn't be here. They gave out trip A ratings, they denied everything. How can you even say with conviction that more of these people and more of this will stop what happened from happening again?

There you go. Dismissal countdown commence.

Oh and by the way, is RP still a fringe candidate?

No, I was making fun of your post because you are all over the place. You said you weren't "sold" on America being an empire. Then you said all empires collapse, citing the Turkish and Roman empires, than you said "you see what' im saying here". Which to me didn't make sense. You contradicted yourself and than at the end of it said "you see what I'm saying". No, I don't think anyone does. Ideological nonsense? Okay, so you ask me to explain positions, and then I do, through what I believe our RP's ideological standings on said issue's. Perhaps I could be wrong here and there, and I will admit I am no expert in the many area's that are discussed here, but overall I think I have a basic understanding, which allows me to discuss these things at all. How am I to explain or at least attempt to answer your questions or defend positions that you are attacking if I can't use the ideology that the man follows and I also happen to believe (for the most part). I respond to almost all of your "critique's", and then you ignore what I say or transform it into something I didn't say. Which more than one person besides myself has pointed out. Rational discussion's take part in this forum all the time, and have for years, I've done it up until now pretty well I think, look in the mirror.

So we aren't sure if America is an empire, but all empires collapse, and America will too. Patriotism is bad. Got it.

I've told this man to do this several times, he won't. He'll just sit in this thread and troll. Quite hilarious, sometimes I'm game to deal with him bust most of the time...:lol: :lol: :lol: .

So are your baseless accusations, you sound like you work for CNN or FOX. Let me grab an article or a video that is edited to make RP look bad so I can present my case. We're dogs chasing tails here, why don't you just start another thread for who you support, this way you just don't sit in here grasping at straws.