kodak Posted September 7, 2002 Share Posted September 7, 2002 A SEX-CRAZED mama's boy flew into a white hot rage and beat his frail parent to death when she refused to pick up the tab for his raunchy romp with a curvy call girl. Authorities say Dean Glick, 41, who lived in Scottsdale, Ariz., with his 82-year-old mom Juanita, was pushed over the edge by what he saw as her prudish and penny-pinching ways. "It's clear by the facts in this case the defendant was just bothered by his mother," prosecutor Juan Martinez told the court. Hot-to-trot Glick had arranged the services of a sexy Latina call girl named Soledad, agreeing to pay a whopping $1,500 in addition to her standard $350 escort service fee for two hour's of steamy sack time. The horny John-wanna-be knew he didn't have money to pay for the sizzling session, but planned to charge the bill to his mother's credit card! But when the curvy cutie and her driver arrived late in the evening, 82-year-old Juanita got wind of her son's naughty scheme -- and made it plain she wasn't paying for any private sex party. Even more embarrassing for Glick, the mortified mom gave her sex-starved son a piece of her mind in front of the startled strangers. As Glick and his party-pooping mother continued to bicker, the hooker and her driver left. But they were so concerned about the intensity of the quarrel that they called the law. Police say frustrated Glick finally went ballistic, grabbed a flashlight and used it to club his tiny 5-foot-5, 102-pound mom again and again. When officers arrived on the scene at about 1:15 a.m., Glick tried to keep them out by barricading the door, but they pushed their way in. Inside, horrified cops found the battered woman lying on the bathroom floor with a huge, seven-inch bruise on her face. Her ribs and sternum were broken and just a few moments later, she expired. At trial, Glick's lawyer pleaded for leniency, arguing that the tragic death was at most a case of "negligence" on his client's part. Defense attorney Daniel Patterson said that the spat over the hooker money had progressed to a "pushing-and-shoving match" that simply went too far. He indicated that far from having intended to kill his own mother, guilt-stricken Glick had tried to save her life after knocking her down -- and had accidentally broken his mom's ribs while attempting to revive her with CPR. Grieving mama's boy Glick sobbed heavily during the trial -- but the jury didn't buy his I'm-so-sorry act. After four hours of deliberation, they found the call-girl-loving killer guilty of first-degree murder on March 22. Prosecutors were gratified by the swift verdict and impressed that jurors weren't swayed by defense arguments that Glick loved his mother too much to have killed her intentionally. "It's satisfying that the jury found its way to a first-degree murder conviction given the fact that it was his mother he killed," Martinez told reporters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ledzep Posted September 7, 2002 Share Posted September 7, 2002 ..ok.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
When Posted September 7, 2002 Share Posted September 7, 2002 glik0 is going to jail huh? 'guilt-stricken Glick had tried to save her life after knocking her down -- and had accidentally broken his mom's ribs while attempting to revive her with CPR.' haha... right... but wheres the link to this article? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr snortalot Posted September 7, 2002 Share Posted September 7, 2002 GLICK IS MY HERO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pistol Posted September 7, 2002 Share Posted September 7, 2002 what a bitch she wouldn't pay. what a tight wad jew slut. can't blame the kid. shit it ain't gonna suck it self. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smart Posted September 7, 2002 Share Posted September 7, 2002 Nah, but what about this Pensacola case with the 2 kids who beat their father to death... the pedophile was accquited and they're gonna be in for life... is it that inconcievable that some 35 year old man couldn't mastermind the plot? Should the kids have been tried as adults? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
When Posted September 7, 2002 Share Posted September 7, 2002 havent heard about that one yet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pissdrunkwhat?! Posted September 7, 2002 Share Posted September 7, 2002 actually i do belive the kids are at fault , they are 13 and 14 thats old enough to know the difference between right and wrong just because someone tells you a detailed plan on how to do something doesnt mean you have to do it , the kids never said they were threatened (i belive dont quote me on this) into killing him and the kids openly admited they didnt like the father , i dont know if they have been sentenced yet but i doubt they will get life the tube said its 20 i think to life but the judge has the option to give them a shorter punishment time due to their age Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.