Obvious

HEAD ON! APPLY DIRECTLY TO THE FOREHEAD! HEAD ON! APPLY DIRECTLY TO THE FOREHEAD! HEAD ON! APPLY DIRECTLY TO THE FOREHEAD! HEAD ON! APPLY DIRECTLY TO THE FOREHEAD! HEAD ON! APPLY DIRECTLY TO THE FOREHEAD! HEAD ON! APPLY DIRECTLY TO THE FOREHEAD! HEAD ON! APPLY DIRECTLY TO THE FOREHEAD! HEAD ON! APPLY DIRECTLY TO THE FOREHEAD! HEAD ON! APPLY DIRECTLY TO THE FOREHEAD! HEAD ON! APPLY DIRECTLY TO THE FOREHEAD! HEAD ON! APPLY DIRECTLY TO THE FOREHEAD! HEAD ON! APPLY DIRECTLY TO THE FOREHEAD! HEAD ON! APPLY DIRECTLY TO THE FOREHEAD! HEAD ON! APPLY DIRECTLY TO THE FOREHEAD! HEAD ON! APPLY DIRECTLY TO THE FOREHEAD! HEAD ON! APPLY DIRECTLY TO THE FOREHEAD! HEAD ON! APPLY DIRECTLY TO THE FOREHEAD! HEAD ON! APPLY DIRECTLY TO THE FOREHEAD! HEAD ON! APPLY DIRECTLY TO THE FOREHEAD! HEAD ON! APPLY DIRECTLY TO THE FOREHEAD! HEAD ON! APPLY DIRECTLY TO THE FOREHEAD!

hahahahaha

this game is pretty fun. reminds me of those chinese flicks about ancient china and some dude in a crowd killing like 1,000 enemies. some people came down on it because they say each sequel is pretty much the same, just with some added features. but since part 5 is the only one i played it's new to me

mq was in town not long ago... had a bunch of throwups out here.

Re: What are you doing right now? bout to head to a fireworks show.

only thing is an ad would never use freezer ice cubes. they'll get the nice square ones.

did he make you jealous?

nice photo. is that last one south san fran?

this game sucks

those are all dope... you ever think about sending those into corona? you never know you could be apart of their u.s. advertising wing

just beat this game recently... probably the best and most realistic wwii fps i ever played... then again the only other game i played was medal of honor... so i had to cop the sequel and am playin it now: i saw the preview trailer of the third one (hell's highway) on the xbox 360 and the graphics look incredible. almost looks like real film and not a video game: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xS8rp8YDQEs

great photos stagnant water

i saw that sony-r1 at the stores... it says it was 10.3 megapixels. that's a lot. i was talking to one of the guys at the camera store, and he said something about how more megapixels wasn't always better. i thought more megapixels meant the picture would be more crisp, sharp and less fuzzy since they're fitting more smaller "squares" in the same amount of space... but he said something about how more megapixels cause there to be less color or something, and 6 megapixels is usually recommended... anyone else heard something like this?

i'm waiting on the sony dsc-h5 to come out... should be out on or before june 9th...

love those photos with the light, ironlion... what kind of camera did you use?

....

yo is that just outside of vegas?