Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

  1. Welcome to the 12ozProphet Forum...
    You are currently logged out and viewing our forum as a guest which only allows limited access to our discussions, photos and other forum features. If you are a 12ozProphet Member please login to get the full experience.

    If you are not a 12ozProphet Member, please take a moment to register to gain full access to our website and all of its features. As a 12ozProphet Member you will be able to post comments, start discussions, communicate privately with other members and access members-only content. Registration is fast, simple and free, so join today and be a part of the largest and longest running Graffiti, Art, Style & Culture forum online.

    Please note, if you are a 12ozProphet Member and are locked out of your account, you can recover your account using the 'lost password' link in the login form. If you no longer have access to the email you registered with, please email us at info@12ozprophet.com and we'll help you recover your account. Welcome to the 12ozProphet Forum (and don't forget to follow @12ozprophet in Instagram)!

U.S. Seeking immunity from International Criminal Court

Discussion in 'Channel Zero' started by Æ°, Jul 4, 2003.

  1. Æ°

    Æ° Senior Member

    Joined: May 12, 2002 Messages: 1,974 Likes Received: 6
    This one is from the washington post. There are others you can find also.

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/artic...-2003Jun30.html


    By Peter Slevin
    Washington Post Staff Writer
    Tuesday, July 1, 2003; Page A14


    The Bush administration, intent on exempting U.S. citizens from prosecution by the International Criminal Court, is drawing fresh accusations of diplomatic heavy-handedness by threatening to cut off military aid to dozens of allies that refuse to sign immunity deals with the United States.

    A deadline for cooperation expired at midnight Monday, freezing money not yet spent this year by about 35 countries and putting the countries on notice that they could be denied millions for military equipment and training programs in the next budget year if they do not comply with U.S. wishes.

    President Bush and his aides are reviewing projects in a number of countries for waivers that could be announced soon. Other nations, including the NATO allies, receive automatic exemptions. But a fierce struggle is underway -- with the United States facing off against much of Europe -- that has led to bad feelings and leaves some small countries feeling squeezed.

    It hardly seems fair, a Lithuanian government official said, to face an aid cutoff over the international court issue despite "standing along with the United States in your fight against terrorism and sending troops to Afghanistan and Iraq." Lithuania is one of seven countries expected to join NATO next year and needs U.S. funding to upgrade its military.

    Croatia has a more complex problem, a diplomat said yesterday. U.S. authorities for years have been pressing the Zagreb government to surrender Croatians for war crimes prosecutions at the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia in The Hague. The issue is politically divisive in a country where certain active political groups believe the matter should be settled at home.

    At the same time, the Bush administration is demanding a written promise -- known as an Article 98 agreement -- from Croatia that no Americans charged in the future with war crimes or other grave offenses would be extradited to the new International Criminal Court. The Croatian government, which has sent suspects to The Hague, is mindful of elections at the end of the year.

    "Signing Article 98 would strengthen these forces and undermine the credibility of the government to cooperate with The Hague," said Ivan Grdesic, Croatia's ambassador to the United States. "If we sign this Article 98, we will in the eyes and minds of the Croatian voters be acting on double standards."

    The Bush administration withdrew its signature last year from the treaty that created the court -- ratified by more than 90 countries -- and embarked on a vast diplomatic campaign to persuade nearly 180 countries to sign the immunity pledges. U.S. officials argued that Americans need protection from politically motivated prosecutions at the court, which opened for business July 1, 2002.

    To press its point, the Bush administration threatened to shut down U.N. peacekeeping missions worldwide until the United Nations provided immunity to Americans. The Security Council granted the demand, then extended it for another year June 12. Secretary General Kofi Annan criticized the resolution. France, Germany and Syria abstained, contending that the exemption weakens the court.

    State Department spokesman Richard Boucher said yesterday that the immunity agreements "will be a significant and pressing matter in our relations with every state." As for the countries that have not signed agreements and receive U.S. military aid, Boucher said, officials will evaluate programs and decide whether they are "sufficiently important to our interests" for Bush to grant a waiver.

    The immediate effect of the midnight deadline is limited. The budget year is only three months from completion, and most money has been spent. A State Department spokesman said $63.9 million in financing for military equipment remains unused by 35 countries that have not signed the agreement and do not have an automatic waiver. An additional $613,000 in education and training money is unspent.

    Countries exempted from the punishment ordered by Congress include the 18 other NATO members, Israel, Egypt, Australia, New Zealand, South Korea and Japan. Administration officials have said privately that other waivers will not come easily. One reason is that governments that took political flak for signing the deals oppose granting the same benefits to others for doing nothing.

    "You don't want to give a free ride to people who don't want to sign," a senior U.S. official said. "You want to keep the incentive and the pressure up, and you want to make sure that those who did take some heat for signing get a better deal from us than those who didn't."

    But with barely 50 countries acceding to the U.S. request despite the large-scale diplomatic campaign, the administration is putting out the message that negotiations will continue. "Our embassies and negotiating teams stand ready to work with interested governments," Boucher said.

    "We're applying the law," said Lincoln P. Bloomfield Jr., assistant secretary of state for political-military affairs, "but we're doing it in a way that continues the conversation."


    © 2003 The Washington Post Company
     
  2. --zeSto--

    --zeSto-- Veteran Member

    Joined: Jul 12, 2000 Messages: 6,979 Likes Received: 2
    such bullshit.

    They want to police the world but refuse to the the real
    internation courts into their own affaires. Such bullshit.
     
  3. unconscience

    unconscience Banned

    Joined: Jun 23, 2003 Messages: 1,601 Likes Received: 0
     
  4. Tyler Durden

    Tyler Durden Veteran Member

    Joined: Nov 18, 2001 Messages: 5,263 Likes Received: 40
  5. T.T Boy

    T.T Boy Dirty Dozen Crew

    Joined: May 18, 2001 Messages: 21,803 Likes Received: 40
    how bad do i want to be a president so i can tell bush publicly to fuck off.
    really bad.
     
  6. seven.13

    seven.13 Dirty Dozen Crew

    Joined: Oct 5, 2000 Messages: 3,572 Likes Received: 19
  7. metallix

    metallix Elite Member

    Joined: Oct 7, 2001 Messages: 2,955 Likes Received: 1
  8. Æ°

    Æ° Senior Member

    Joined: May 12, 2002 Messages: 1,974 Likes Received: 6
    Bumpity bap bap fap.
     
  9. BROWNer

    BROWNer Guest

Top