--->

What the fuck are you talking about???? Did you even read any of my posts?

Are you sure you're not a cop? Cause this sounds like some bullshit I would expect to hear one cop telling another during training or something. Complete bullshit.

I'm just saying... leave it to someone that lives in the real world to understand real life because all you sheltered fucks apparently dont.

He'll be sure to ague the contrary though.

"Angel of Death"s definition of freedom is what most people would consider an opressive, authoritarian government run by corporations that don't give a shit if the Earth and it's people live or die so long as our taxes go to building a military that is strong enough to pillage the world instead of going to feeding the poor or giving our citizens any kind of healthcare or proper education. .

Hahahahahah!!!!!! Oh the IRONY!!!!!:lol:

Sometimes you're depth of ignorance truely astounds me.

I'm the ONLY one here (besides ayebee) that IS looking at both sides of the coin! You're automatically condemning him because he killed a cop. The fact that it was a cop automatically cancels everything else in your book. THAT IS ONE SIDED!!! YOU refuse to recognise that this man that killed the cop had a LIFE too, and that he was doing what he thought he had to in order to PRESERVE that life. It's beyond obvious that he was looking at ALOT more than a speeding ticket and that's why he tried to do what he had to do to avoid rotting in prison. I'm the one that is admitting not only that the guy had HIS OWN reasons for doing what he did... but that the cop had his reasons for doing what he did TOO. Shit happens. You live by the gun... sometimes you die by the gun. In this case they both died by the gun. And for a guy that is openly biased against the police (and I have my reasons) it takes alot for me to fully admit that the cop was doing his job like I've been. Now just admit that this other guy was trying to DEFEND himself from the cops. .

THANK YOU!!! Leave it to one of the only people in Channel Zero that I know actually even writes graffiti (illegally) to understand where I'm coming from.

I swear to God it's in one ear and right out the other with you people. Of course he had something to hide THAT'S WHY HE RAN! He didn't just grab his gun and walk up to the squad car and blast dude... No... He TRIED TO GET AWAY! he tried to get out of the situation but the cop pressed the issue and gave chase (of coarse, doing his job) and sicked the dog on him to attack and shred him (like it's trained to do) so dude shot the dog and shot the cop so he wouldn't get shot for shooting the dog. All laws asside that is self defense in any sense of nature. He was DEFENDING himself from the dog and the cop. I'm not saying weather or not it was the right thing to do but for all any of us knows he could have been looking at his third strike and knew it was either risk his life trying to get the fuck outa there, or spend the rest of his life and eventually die in prison. Personally, I'd rather go down in a hail of bullets killing cops than to spend the remainder of my life in prison. But I'm sure you robots will have trouble comprehending that one too.

I had no idea there was a "liberal party". But I will agree that alot of shit that is labeled "liberal bullshit" doesn't make sense to me. Like how people are called liberal for wanting to ban guns or ban this or that. I always figured "liberal" was a derivative of the word liberty... meaning you stand for freedom and liberty. I'd think that people that are out to ban everything wouldn't be called "liberals". .

That's why I said "bad move".

He was also defending himself from getting ripped to shreds by shooting the dog, then against being shot for shooting the dog by shooting the cops. Bad move, it's not legal do defend yourself against the cops. But it is what it is.

Self preservation.

If all he was getting was a speeding ticket he wouldn't have grabbed his gun and ran. He obviously had alot more comming than a speeding ticket. Sometime's I feel like I'm trying to explain common sense perspective to a room full of robots. I give up. .

Well then the what yall call liberals and conservatives must be the reverse in the U.S.

I think you meant "neo conservative". Quite the opposite of Liberal.

How much does Mexico benefit from us other than what imigrants send home? I'm sure they do to an extent but compare them to Canada. Canada's a rich country. You're trying to make it sound like Canadas financial exsistance is dependant on the US. That's pretty arrogant. Canada would be fine without us. .

Liar.

...

Canada doesn't invade and pillage other countries. America does.

Learn how to read, then read my posts. I'm not saying it was LEGALLY SELF DEFENSE. I'm tallking common sense and you fools are just reciting the law. I didn't even say that the guy that shot the cop didn't get what was comming. I just said that dude was DEFENDING HIMSELF FROM AN ATTACKING DOG AND A MAN WITH A GUN. And sometimes what goes around comes around and the cop got killed while attacking someone. Good ridence.

That's not the point you fucking idiot.

What am I rebeling against? I'm just saying that he was obviously defending himself when he shot the dog and the cops. You keep argueing that he somehow couldn't have been defending himself because the guy he shot was a cop and the dog was a police dog. That doesn't make any sense. I don't care if it was a Navy seal chasing Bin Laden, if Bin Laden turns around and blasts the Seal... he was defending himself. Period.

You still aren't listening. Dude was being chased. It doesn't matter why or what the law says, in reality he shot in SELF DEFENSE. You keep repeating the same legal issues... I'm not talking about the law, I'm talking common sense. I'm also not the one crying "brutality". I clearly stated that I'm not saying dude was in the right to shoot the cop OR that the other cops were nescesarily "wrong" to shoot him. I'm just saying that if someone with a gun is chasing you and sicks a dog on you that shooting them is SELF DEFENSE. Not legally, of coarse not. But in reality that's what it is.