J B Suspecto
-
Posts
108 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by J B Suspecto
-
-
i was seriously hoping you died in those australian floods frankiefiver or jb suspecto or whatever the fuck your name is.
i think youre still kind of upset that your shit talking caught you a permaban.
haha fuck man, you were sitting there reading/watching the news and thinking about me? You care waaaayyyy too much about a graffiti message board. Anyway, Im out.
Catchya round you bigboned faggot.
btw. Don't forget to remind everyone how you love fat chicks today! They might forget!
-
not as much free time as you have e-stalking me for 3 months.
:lol:
haha you seriously make me laugh! It cut both ways fatboy, you dissed me I dissed you. There is no sense in trying to say I stalked you when it went back and forth. Meanwhile you have made 13 posts a day, 2 pages worth in this thread alone, 33,300+ in total on a graffiti forum. Nice work bigfella! I hope things are going well in your life!
-
hahah jesus man you mustn't have much going on right now if you can sit around making PAGES of posts begging me to say something.
-
i actually think youre one of the cooler people from australia on 12oz.
i was surprised to find out that you associate with shit talkers like that guy.
Oh wise whale fucker of channel zero, please bless us with your approved 12oz account list. For we must know who we are to associate with and who shall be exiled!
-
funny, thats not what you were saying when you were trying to get me to fly out to australia to come and fight you.
youre a fucking joke:lol:
Yeah, out of nowhere I was trying to get you to fly to Australia to fight me. hahah
That sounds plausible!
-
Tough guy! What ever you do, please dont come and bash me br0! hahaha
-
hahah Always talking about your nuts. Get the fuck out of here with that.
If you don't like my thread don't post in here. Gronk.
-
suck a dick hot sauce.
oh and jb suspecto....enjoy going from 3 tic tacs to two tampons, bitch.
jb suspecto = frankiefiver
frankiefiver = banned
therefore jb suspecto should be banned.
youre a bitch for real
get over yourself and get off 120z.
nobody fucking likes you....you bitch made mark.
OH NO! I have some red squares next to my name! What a fucking disaster! hahah
I don't care you 'stocky' fucker. You spend so much time on here you think its important hahaha
Now thats funny!
-
Fuckin good life brah.
-
1
-
-
A glass of bubbly and burners lad, thats whats on my mind!
-
BURNER BRAH!
-
FUKN ESHAY LAD!
-
Originally Posted by wearekilluminati
lol....no it seems to me like your the idiot! lol thaks for the laugh. trick bitch
Originally Posted by J B Suspecto
haha you fucking toy. You are seriously the stupidest person who posts in crossfire.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wearekilluminati
TOY! HA.... I GOT NO EGO SO GET THE FUCK OUTTA HERE.
-
1
-
-
Jacque Fresco is a utopian cornball with a static view of society and no understanding of the economics he criticises. Just for starters Fresco could learn a lot by reading about L. Mises calculation problem.
While he denies it in nonsensical way, the ridiculous system of social organisation he espouses is simply Marxism 2.0 with an eco twist.
-
1
-
-
Non-interventionism does not increase national security because history shows many many times that non-interventionist states have been attacked regardless of their foreign policy.
This statement is disingenuous. What R. Paul is talking about is reducing motivation towards negative engagement. Quite obviously there are many reasons why a nation or political organisation may negatively engage with another, the consequences of interventionism and blow-back are just two forms of these which exists within a spectrum of others. Yet, if blow-back is identified as a concept with explanatory power factoring in several major cases of negative engagement since the terms conception, surely it is a reasonable response to attempt to neutralise this motivation to warfare or other manoeuvring.
So if we can move past such simplistic and misleading arguments which present a binary outcome of either non-interventionism preventing war or not, we can see that the real argument is if non-interventionism reduces the frequency or severity of war or other negative engagement. The most obvious way to answer this question would be to look backwards to find historical comparisons. Yet all of the historical examples you have mentioned have been much more an issue of the relative power between nations/political units than interventionism or non-interventionism. Indigenous Australia could have hardly lead a forward deployment policy preventing British conquest, for example. In contrast, as the US is still by far the most powerful nation on this earth, a point which you have made repeatedly in other threads, the kind of power imbalance which led to conquest in the colonial period is hardly likely to be replicated in between the US and other interested countries in the near future should the US pursue an non-interventionist policy.
-
Sure, but that's not going to stop your neighbour from messing with you. And warfare is different than small scale/small arms combat. having a defensive position allows your enemy to surveil you, gain intelligence, undermine your defences and take whatever time they need to build up their offensive strengths whilst you just sit there and wait. Being static is what China did and the West came in and took their coast from them. The defensive position is usually the weakest because unless geography assists you, you do not have the initiative.
This is hardly a reasonable comparison to make. Paul advocates non-interventionism, not isolationism as China did in the era you speak of. As I'm sure you know, the Chinese state considered itself the centre of the civilised universe and grossly underestimated the the power of these western barbarians who were skirmishing on the coastline trying to secure port space and trade networks. By comparison, Paul is pro free-trade, which eliminates much of the source of this conflict to begin with.
In a previous post you have said;
So, an isolationist US would equal:
Increase of Russian, Chinese and Iranian influence.
That would mean access denial to the Persian Gulf and Suez Canal along with the South China Seas and the Malacca Straits. The outcome of that would mean energy prices would rise DRAMATICALLY, access to raw materials would become more complicated and expensive due to declining access to key water ways and export markets as well as cheap labor bases would be closed off to the US (as well as a HUGE amount of US interests throughout the world would be nationalised and the US couldn't do shit because mobilising to take them back would be so damned expensive).
The cost of living in the US would triple within 5 years and your access to products would decline MASSIVELY. The US (And the world) would be forced to totally change their societies, culture and economies. That may result in a nice, green, egalitarian society like we all want it to be. It could also change in to a messy, polluted, authoritarian state where people screw each other over for resources and access (thinking China today here). There is no reason to say that this change would bring about the results that you want for your country. The only thing we can say for sure is that it would bring change, TOUGH change and it would be decades before the country stabilized again, if it didn't break apart or get eaten by Russia, China or Iran first.
You often accuse people of sounding like chicken little, I think you have now demonstrated a propensity to the same behaviour. This line of argument would suggest that no other nations bar the US and perhaps some of their allies benefit from trade. This idea is patently untrue. However, focussing purely on the cost to US citizens, even if transport became more expensive in absence of US gov naval protection, this increased cost would be offset by the dramatic decrease in government spending paid for through taxation.
It is one of the great fallacies of a statist position that looks at the current role of state actions and argues without any particular gov institution there would be chaos and disorder. There is very little that a government can do that can't be replicated by private action in a more efficient way. Wholesale theft and oppression of a citizenry may be one exception, leading an entire nation to war may be another.
-
2
-
-
Yo Klaro how did it feel to get rolled by big Minezy?
-
Computer games are really going too far these days. When I was a kid you could finish shit like Mario Bros in a few sittings if you where keen, now it takes months!
Its not surprising really though, if you put enough money into research to find out what will keep gamers hooked on gaming, eventually your going to crack it.
-
He was burned up about getting too many advertising texts from Vodafone!
-
-
Defy your a douche. Quite please.
-
I have probably been posting on this site longer than you kid.
-
I like white russians. I couldnt give the slightest fuck what people think.
-
Oh yeah I forgot, you guys are psuedo elitest faggots.. my mistake.
Private Message Beef
in Channel Zero
Posted
hahah 'Someone' has gotten the mods to delete my post with Caligula's tantrum!