J B Suspecto

hahah 'Someone' has gotten the mods to delete my post with Caligula's tantrum!

haha fuck man, you were sitting there reading/watching the news and thinking about me? You care waaaayyyy too much about a graffiti message board. Anyway, Im out. Catchya round you bigboned faggot. btw. Don't forget to remind everyone how you love fat chicks today! They might forget!

haha you seriously make me laugh! It cut both ways fatboy, you dissed me I dissed you. There is no sense in trying to say I stalked you when it went back and forth. Meanwhile you have made 13 posts a day, 2 pages worth in this thread alone, 33,300+ in total on a graffiti forum. Nice work bigfella! I hope things are going well in your life!

hahah jesus man you mustn't have much going on right now if you can sit around making PAGES of posts begging me to say something.

Oh wise whale fucker of channel zero, please bless us with your approved 12oz account list. For we must know who we are to associate with and who shall be exiled!

Yeah, out of nowhere I was trying to get you to fly to Australia to fight me. hahah That sounds plausible!

Tough guy! What ever you do, please dont come and bash me br0! hahaha

hahah Always talking about your nuts. Get the fuck out of here with that. If you don't like my thread don't post in here. Gronk.

OH NO! I have some red squares next to my name! What a fucking disaster! hahah I don't care you 'stocky' fucker. You spend so much time on here you think its important hahaha Now thats funny!

Fuckin good life brah.

A glass of bubbly and burners lad, thats whats on my mind!

BURNER BRAH!

FUKN ESHAY LAD!

Originally Posted by wearekilluminati lol....no it seems to me like your the idiot! lol thaks for the laugh. trick bitch Originally Posted by J B Suspecto haha you fucking toy. You are seriously the stupidest person who posts in crossfire. Quote: Originally Posted by wearekilluminati TOY! HA.... I GOT NO EGO SO GET THE FUCK OUTTA HERE.

Jacque Fresco is a utopian cornball with a static view of society and no understanding of the economics he criticises. Just for starters Fresco could learn a lot by reading about L. Mises calculation problem. While he denies it in nonsensical way, the ridiculous system of social organisation he espouses is simply Marxism 2.0 with an eco twist.

This statement is disingenuous. What R. Paul is talking about is reducing motivation towards negative engagement. Quite obviously there are many reasons why a nation or political organisation may negatively engage with another, the consequences of interventionism and blow-back are just two forms of these which exists within a spectrum of others. Yet, if blow-back is identified as a concept with explanatory power factoring in several major cases of negative engagement since the terms conception, surely it is a reasonable response to attempt to neutralise this motivation to warfare or other manoeuvring. So if we can move past such simplistic and misleading arguments which present a binary outcome of either non-interventionism preventing war or not, we can see that the real argument is if non-interventionism reduces the frequency or severity of war or other negative engagement. The most obvious way to answer this question would be to look backwards to find historical comparisons. Yet all of the historical examples you have mentioned have been much more an issue of the relative power between nations/political units than interventionism or non-interventionism. Indigenous Australia could have hardly lead a forward deployment policy preventing British conquest, for example. In contrast, as the US is still by far the most powerful nation on this earth, a point which you have made repeatedly in other threads, the kind of power imbalance which led to conquest in the colonial period is hardly likely to be replicated in between the US and other interested countries in the near future should the US pursue an non-interventionist policy.

This is hardly a reasonable comparison to make. Paul advocates non-interventionism, not isolationism as China did in the era you speak of. As I'm sure you know, the Chinese state considered itself the centre of the civilised universe and grossly underestimated the the power of these western barbarians who were skirmishing on the coastline trying to secure port space and trade networks. By comparison, Paul is pro free-trade, which eliminates much of the source of this conflict to begin with. In a previous post you have said; You often accuse people of sounding like chicken little, I think you have now demonstrated a propensity to the same behaviour. This line of argument would suggest that no other nations bar the US and perhaps some of their allies benefit from trade. This idea is patently untrue. However, focussing purely on the cost to US citizens, even if transport became more expensive in absence of US gov naval protection, this increased cost would be offset by the dramatic decrease in government spending paid for through taxation. It is one of the great fallacies of a statist position that looks at the current role of state actions and argues without any particular gov institution there would be chaos and disorder. There is very little that a government can do that can't be replicated by private action in a more efficient way. Wholesale theft and oppression of a citizenry may be one exception, leading an entire nation to war may be another.

Yo Klaro how did it feel to get rolled by big Minezy?

Computer games are really going too far these days. When I was a kid you could finish shit like Mario Bros in a few sittings if you where keen, now it takes months! Its not surprising really though, if you put enough money into research to find out what will keep gamers hooked on gaming, eventually your going to crack it.

He was burned up about getting too many advertising texts from Vodafone!

Defy your a douche. Quite please.

I have probably been posting on this site longer than you kid.

I like white russians. I couldnt give the slightest fuck what people think.

Oh yeah I forgot, you guys are psuedo elitest faggots.. my mistake.