Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...
Sign in to follow this  
Don't Panic

While I hate to bring up the 2000 elections....

Recommended Posts

I thought this was worth bringing up, and couldn't find anything relating to it after a few searches.


Here's a video for those of you who don't like to read.


And here is an article that seems to have almost all of its apostrophes replaces with question marks for no apparent reason:


THE GREAT FLORIDA EX-CON GAME How the ?felon? voter-purge was itself felonious

Harper's Magazine

Friday, March 1, 2002

by Greg Palast


In November the U.S. media, lost in patriotic reverie, dressed up the Florida recount as a victory for President Bush. But however one reads the ballots, Bush's win would certainly have been jeopardized had not some Floridians been barred from casting ballots at all. Between May 1999 and Election Day 2000, two Florida secretaries of state - Sandra Mortham and Katherine Harris, both protégées of Governor Jeb Bush- ordered 57,700 "ex-felons," who are prohibited from voting by state law, to be removed from voter rolls. (In the thirty-five states where former felons can vote, roughly 90 percent vote Democratic.) A portion of the list, which was compiled for Florida by DBT Online, can be seen for the first time here; DBT, a company now owned by ChoicePoint of Atlanta, was paid $4.3 million for its work, replacing a firm that charged $5,700 per year for the same service. If the hope was that DBT would enable Florida to exclude more voters, then the state appears to have spent its money wisely.


"scrub sheet" the following names are on


Two of these "scrub lists," as officials called them, were distributed to counties in the months before the election with orders to remove the voters named. Together the lists comprised nearly 1 percent of Florida?s electorate and nearly 3 percent of its African-American voters. Most of the voters (such as "David Butler," (1); a name that appears 77 times in Florida phone books) were selected because their name, gender, birthdate and race matched - or nearly matched - one of the tens of millions of ex-felons in the United States. Neither DBT nor the state conducted any further research to verify the matches. DBT, which frequently is hired by the F.B.I. to conduct manhunts, originally proposed using address histories and financial records to confirm the names, but the state declined the cross-checks. In Harris?s elections office files, next to DBT?s sophisticated verification plan, there is a hand-written note: ?DON?T NEED.?




Thomas Alvin Cooper (2), twenty-eight, was flagged because of a crime for which he will be convicted in the year 2007. According to Florida?s elections division, this intrepid time-traveler will cover his tracks by moving to Ohio, adding a middle name, and changing his race. Harper's found 325 names on the list with conviction dates in the future, a fact that did not escape Department of Elections workers, who, in June 2000 emails headed, ?Future Conviction Dates," termed the discovery, "bad news.? Rather than release this whacky data to skeptical counties, Janet Mudrow, state liaison to DBT, suggested that ?blanks would be preferable in these cases." (Harper's counted 4,917 blank conviction dates.) The one county that checked each of the 694 names on its local list could verify only 34 as actual felony convicts. Some counties defied Harris' directives; Madison County's elections supervisor Linda Howell refused the purge list after she found her own name on it.




Rev. Willie Dixon (3), seventy, was guilty of a crime in his youth; but one phone call would have told the state that it had already pardoned Dixon and restored his right to vote. On behalf of Dixon and other excluded voters, the NAACP in January 2001 sued Florida and Harris, after finding that African-Americans?who account for 13 percent of Florida's electorate and 46 percent of U.S. felony convictions ?were four times as likely as whites to be incorrectly singled out under the state's methodology. After the election, Harris and her elections chief Clay Roberts, testified under oath that verifying the lists was solely the work of county supervisors. But the Florida-DBT contract (marked "Secret" and ?Confidential?) holds DBT responsible for ?manual verification using telephone calls.? in fact, with the state?s blessing, DBT did not call a single felon. When I asked Roberts about the contract during an interview for BBC television, Roberts ripped off his microphone, ran into his office, locked the door, and called in state troopers to remove us.




Johnny Jackson Jr. (4), thirty-two, has never been to Texas, and his mother swears he never had the middle name ?Fitzgerald.? Neither is there evidence that John Fitzgerald Jackson, felon of Texas, has ever left the Lone Star State. But even if they were the same man, removing him from Florida?s voter rolls is an unconstitutional act. Texas is among the thirty five states where ex-felons are permitted to vote, and the "full faith and credit" clause of the U.S. Constitution forbids states to revoke any civil rights that a citizen has been granted by another state; in fact, the Florida Supreme Court had twice ordered the state not to do so, just nine months before the voter purge. Nevertheless, at least 2,873 voters were wrongly removed, a purge authorized by a September 18, 2000 letter to counties from Governor Bush's clemency office. On February 23, 2001, days after the U.S. Commission of Civil Rights began investigating the matters, Bush's office issued a new letter allowing these persons to vote; no copies of the earlier letter could be found in the clemency office or on its computers.




Wallace McDonald (5), sixty-four, lost his right to vote in 2000, though his sole run-in with the law was a misdemeanor in 1959. (He fell asleep on a bus-stop bench.) Of the "matches' on these lists, the civil-rights commission estimated that at least 14 percent - or 8,000 voters, nearly 15 times Bush's official margin of victory - were false. DBT claims it warned officials "a significant number of people who were not a felon would be included on the list"; but the state, the company now says, "wanted there to be more names than were actually verified." Last May, Florida's legislature barred Harris from using outside firms to build the purge list and ordered her to seek guidance from county elections officials. In defiance, Harris has rebuffed the counties and hired another firm, just in time for Jeb Bush's reelection fight this fall.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
This forum is supported by the 12ozProphet Shop, so go buy a shirt and help support!
This forum is brought to you by the 12ozProphet Shop.
This forum is brought to you by the 12oz Shop.

You're one of those hippie jerkoffs that is always shoving 9/11 conspiracy theories in my face in berkeley. Quite putting those goddamn "Free Palestine" posters over my stencils.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Disturbing report, but not suprising


Both the Republican and Democratic parties have been known to pull election-day shenanigans like this. This is not to say that Democratic shenanigans in the past justify Republican shenanigans in 2000 (they don't) but I am really not surprised. Are you?


I hear about unfair things happening at the polls from time-to-time, but I've voted in a lot of elections, and worked at the polls a few times, and I've never seen or heard of anything even remotely approximating this ^^^. Usually, it's people who moved from one precinct to another without changing their Voter's Registration card. You can't vote twice, and you can't vote in a precinct in which you do not reside.


BTW, I have always been told that people convicted of a felony in Texas lost their right to vote. Are you 100% sure that the statement that convicts can vote in Texas is accurate? I don't think it's correct.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not at all surprised, but up until now wasn't aware of this, and it is pretty bad- as you mentioned. One note about being registered to vote in two counties- The Katherine Harris woman in the article was registered to vote in two countis in Florida herself. She also quit her position as Secretary of State with a letter declaring that she had left the job something like 4-6 months earlier, so she could qualify to run for the current seat she has as a congresswoman.


Texas Voter's Bill of Rights:

9)If you have been convicted of a felony, but have served your complete sentence (including incarceration, parole or supervision), you have the right to vote. [§ 11.002]




What if my conviction was for a federal crime?

Texas applies the same rules whether you were convicted of a federal or state crime.

If you were convicted of a federal crime, your right to vote is restored once you have been fully discharged from the terms of your sentence or once you have received a pardon. Individuals convicted of a federal crime may not apply for a pardon for the purpose of restoring the right to vote unless they have completed the sentence for the federal offense, the conviction occurred three or more years before the date of application, and the individual has not been convicted at any other time of any offense under the laws of Texas, another state, or the United States.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Create New...