Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

Kenosha and the crooked media. Rittenhouse might be fucked.


Recommended Posts

This forum is supported by the 12ozProphet Shop, so go buy a shirt and help support!
This forum is brought to you by the 12ozProphet Shop.
This forum is brought to you by the 12oz Shop.

The kid inserted himself into a situation he had no business being in and brought a rifle to boot. That shows premeditation, therefore murder in the eyes of the law, not manslaughter, or self defense. 
 

I think it’s pretty clear he went looking for a fight and found one.
 

 

  • Truth 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, abrasivesaint said:

The kid inserted himself into a situation he had no business being in and brought a rifle to boot. That shows premeditation, therefore murder in the eyes of the law, not manslaughter, or self defense. 
 

I think it’s pretty clear he went looking for a fight and found one.
 

 

 

He went to LARP and bit off more than he could chew. If those people hadn't attacked him they wouldn't be dead, I'm not buying murder

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, abrasivesaint said:

You could argue if he didn’t insert himself and his rifle into a situation he had no business being in, those people wouldn’t be dead. 

 

That's a bit backwards. Blaming him for their behavior.

Sure, he had no business there other than to antagonize and protect property that wasn't even his, it was really unnecessary. That being said, don't attack a dude with a brick or a skateboard when he's holding a rifle maybe? He wasn't the aggressor here, he was standing guard over some shit they were trying to loot or destroy

 

Play stupid games and all that

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, Kults said:

 

That's a bit backwards. Blaming him for their behavior.

Sure, he had no business there other than to antagonize and protect property that wasn't even his, it was really unnecessary. That being said, don't attack a dude with a brick or a skateboard when he's holding a rifle maybe? He wasn't the aggressor here, he was standing guard over some shit they were trying to loot or destroy

 

Play stupid games and all that

 

 


Well in order for this not to be murder you’d hate to blame them for his behavior. Which won’t fly and which is why he’ll be someone’s boyfriend until his hair greys 

Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Dark_Knight said:


Well in order for this not to be murder you’d hate to blame them for his behavior. Which won’t fly and which is why he’ll be someone’s boyfriend until his hair greys 

 

You think? I dunno I haven't been following recent developments. It sounds like there could be a self defense angle. I just don't see him getting murder

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the state laws on guns are strict and that's what they're going to use to fuck him. It won't be about self defense in court I think. 
 

He should have never been there imo. It was a bad situation all lined up and waiting to happen really. 
 

Do I think he defended himself against deadly force?  Sure I do. But I don't think he should have showed up to begin with. 
 

3 are dead and now they will make an example of Rittenhouse. 

  • Like 1
  • Truth 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Kults said:

Sure, he had no business there other than to antagonize and protect property that wasn't even his, it was really unnecessary. That being said, don't attack a dude with a brick or a skateboard when he's holding a rifle maybe?


Completely agree. Except i’m not seeing and haven’t heard about a brick. As far as i knew, it was a plastic bag with random shit in it. 
 

12 minutes ago, Kults said:

He wasn't the aggressor here, he was standing guard over some shit they were trying to loot or destroy


Disagree. In this situation he is underage and not legally allowed to own a firearm, crossing state lines, to “protect” property that isn’t his, and was not hired to protect. 

He had no business with that rifle, nor the protection of these businesses. 
 

All of this said though, i’m going to be very surprised if these charges stick, and i have to admit i have suspicions of whether it’s intentional. 

 

First degree reckless homicide requires the proof of utter disregard for human life, which i’d argue is going to be a hard sell..

 

2nd degree reckless homicide is simply the reckless causing of a death. THIS is what i think he should have been charged with, and what i think would have a much higher chance of sticking to him. 
 

In the end, i do not think this kid should not walk away from this free and clear.  

  • Like 1
  • Truth 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Dirty_habiT said:

 

I think the state laws on guns are strict and that's what they're going to use to fuck him. It won't be about self defense in court I think. 


I also think this is a very important factor. I don’t know what sort of legal grounds you can claim in terms of self defense if you’re possessing the firearm illegally.. that’s a cluster fuck i’m not about to dive into and start researching right now, haha. 

  • Like 1
  • Truth 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Dirty_habiT changed the title to Kenosha and the crooked media. Rittenhouse might be fucked.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...