Jump to content

Subterfuge Tube - YouTube videos wrapped in intrigue


KILZ FILLZ

Recommended Posts

This forum is supported by the 12ozProphet Shop, so go buy a shirt and help support!
This forum is brought to you by the 12ozProphet Shop.
This forum is brought to you by the 12oz Shop.

 

"The largest broadcaster in the country is forcing its anchors to read a promotional script that warns viewers about "fake news" on other stations and media. Its among the Sinclair Broadcast Group's now infamous "must-run" segments that include conservative commentary and reports about terrorism."

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

"A media artist named Brian Springer tapped into the raw satellite feeds of various news broadcasts to create this portrait of the American media during the 1992 election. We see Larry King sucking up to various politicians (including trying to get George H.W. Bush to invest in a pharmaceutical business!), and local news anchors expressing disgust at the L.A. rioters and an Indigenous historian who questions Christopher Columbus' legacy. A subplot involves Larry Agran, who ran for the Democratic nomination on the platform of cutting military spending to pay for domestic infrastructure projects, and whose presence in the race was almost completely ignored by the media."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

"there is this evidence from a federal flight controller published a few days later in a newspaper in New Hampshire: that an F-16 had been "in hot pursuit" of the hijacked United jet and "must have seen the whole thing". Also, there was one brief report on CBS television before the crash that two F-16 fighters were tailing Flight 93. Vice-President Dick Cheney acknowledged five days later that President Bush had authorised the Air Force pilots to shoot down hijacked commercial aircraft."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

"Science journalists were concerned early on. The Times’s science editor reported the opinion of the spokesman from the National Radiological Protection Board (NRPB) that Britain had no need to fear radiation released in the accident (“Britain safe, says watchdog body”), and a rather soothing statement from the International Atomic Energy Agency. The Guardian was lower in temperature (“Radioactive Russian dust cloud escapes”), and filled its space with a rundown of facts about other nuclear accidents and an explanation by its science correspondent of the types of radioisotope released and their effects on the human body."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

"Frat House first premiered at the 1998 Sundance Film Festival and won the Grand Jury Prize for Documentary. That was before the allegations surfaced, though, and even with Phillips and Gurland standing by the fact that the events portrayed are real, the controversy was enough for HBO to blackball the film."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Alice in Wonderland (1949) French live action / stop motion adaptation of the Lewis Carroll classic, US release was suppressed by The Walt Disney Company. The British Board of Film Censors blocked its release because they found it offensive to the memory of Queen Victoria. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/19/2019 at 2:56 PM, KILZ FILLZ said:

 

"The largest broadcaster in the country is forcing its anchors to read a promotional script that warns viewers about "fake news" on other stations and media. Its among the Sinclair Broadcast Group's now infamous "must-run" segments that include conservative commentary and reports about terrorism."

 

So I have some knowledge about two of these, starting with the above.

 

That coordinated readout of "fake news" was an attempt to salvage credibility and turn the tables (a la Trump calling anyone who reports bad things about him fake news - remove credibility and no one will believe what they say. Soviets did similar things and Russia continues to do the same today with RT, Sputnik, etc.).

 

These stations were some of the heaviest that were buying into the BS that Stone, Posobiec, et al were putting out (think pizzagate, Seth Rich, etc.) and when the backlash against all this conspiracy craziness started to crack, they got on the front foot and turned the tables on the competing channels (which also indicates that the mainstream media is not monolithic, that there are competing poles, in the very least). This was an act of propaganda itself. Accuse the others of what you are guilty and then when they accuse you of the same, your response is "Oh great, 'I know you are, but what am I'". See the most recent posts by @Kultsand @abrasivesaintin the Epstein thread for a great example of this.

 

It seems that people are now interpreting this as "there is a secret control over the media, look, they're all saying scripted stuff, the exact same words", yet they have not understood the context here. Although, it's safe to say that there is editorial control within news conglomerates, no doubt about that. Murdoch is an absolute pig for that, his newspapers in Australia have followed the same path as Fox News in that there is a very clear conservative line and the most tabloidesque don't even attempt to hide it anymore. The left media aren't as organised (although, just as biased) as there is less money in left leaning perspectives in Australia, it seems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/19/2019 at 2:57 PM, KILZ FILLZ said:

 

"there is this evidence from a federal flight controller published a few days later in a newspaper in New Hampshire: that an F-16 had been "in hot pursuit" of the hijacked United jet and "must have seen the whole thing". Also, there was one brief report on CBS television before the crash that two F-16 fighters were tailing Flight 93. Vice-President Dick Cheney acknowledged five days later that President Bush had authorised the Air Force pilots to shoot down hijacked commercial aircraft."

This approach is the one that suggests the passenger aircraft was shot down by USAF because they believed it was headed for the White House or a similarly important building (which may well be true). The problem with this is two-fold. Firstly, in any crisis situation the dust must settle long before you can come to any conclusion. I worked in a crisis response-type role (assisting private firms respond to crises, to put it simply) for seven years. The #1 rule is don't believe the first (ten!) things you hear. The situation will remain fluid for a long time. most people won't understand what they're seeing and new facts will appear that change everything. This report here is just too early to be a determining factor and there has been no corroboration that I've seen since.

 

Secondly, and most importantly, when an aircraft is shot down, whether by SAM or air-to-air, they don't explode into tiny pieces in a big fireball like Hollywood would have you believe. They are hit by the frag and blast from the missile, often punted from their trajectory and break up in mid air with debris and bodies scattered over a wide area. The best evidence for this is the pics from the crash site of MH17:

 

 

_76434372_debris1comp_624.jpg

17D41064-9F28-41E6-BC53-98B381A7C729_cx0

ukraine-scenes-mh1_2981651k.jpg

 

Fuck, came across a pic of a dead baby in a field looking those pics up. Just fucking shit what we do to each other, we're the worst of the animal kingdom sometimes.

 

Not impossible that the aircraft was shot down and covered up. This bit of 'evidence' does not do anything to convince, though. BTW, Mark Bingham, one of the guys who stormed the cockpit was a personal and family friend. I knew him through rugby and my sister married his best friend.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Hua Guofangany idea if his family got a check from the movie Hollywood made about that flight? Haven't there been a couple of them now? A farmer said he saw the AC impact, nearly upside down, at like a 40deg angle. Crash investigation concurs. I think this one will always have a split of people. Some believing there were heros and others believing it was prevented from striking its final target in another way. RIP to your bud. 🙏 

 

 

That Sinclair one is something straight out of a dystopian novel. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

 

Coonskin - blend of live action and cartoon. Banned from theaters after protests by Al Sharpton (without watching it). Wu Tang were in talks to reboot. Characature of racism in America and Disney that was taken as racist itself. Go figure you can't judge something by watching the first 5 mins. 

 

***

 

"The key question seems to be whether the film is racist. I saw a rough cut of “Coonskin” several weeks ago. The film opens with a live action sequence: Two black convicts are planning an escape from prison. While they wait for two friends with a getaway car, the older convict tells his young companion a story—which unfolds in animation. The cartoon characters in the fable. —Rabbit, Bear, and Fox—obviously parallel the characters introduced in the opening sequence, and the actors who appear in the live action scenes also provide the voices of the cartoon characters. The story that the old convict tells is of three rural blacks who come to Harlem, get entangled in chicanery and corruption, but eventually destroy the white gangsters who control‐the ghetto. The black characters depicted include a false prophet, a true revolutionary, a preacher, a boxer, a shoeshine man, a number of tenement dwellers, hoods and prostitutes."

https://www.nytimes.com/1975/07/20/archives/the-campaign-to-suppress-coonskin-it-depicts-blacks-as-slaves.html

 

 

***

 

 

" Released in 1975 under a variety of titles ranging from Coonskin to Bustin’ Out to Street Fight, the film was written and directed by Ralph Bakshi to serve the dual purpose of pushing adult-minded experimental animation as far as possible, and to tackle America’s history of race and segregation head-on, using a narrative that blends folklore with Blaxploitation films the imagery of horrific racial stereotypes.

It’s hard to even describe how unnerving the entire film is, from start to finish. To begin with, the merging of live action and animated elements is flat out bizarre and unsettling. Bakshi will do things like have a live action tracking shot representing a character’s first person POV of walking through actual NYC streets. But when the character enters a location and the film cuts to a third person perspective, the character is now animated. Still photographs serve as a backgrounds, while other sequences jarringly combine animated characters conversing with live action ones. And occasionally, Bakshi decides to just say “Fuck it” and indulge in mind-shreddingly insane freakouts and dream sequences, the cinematic equivalent of smashing the audience in the face with a frying pan over and over and over again. Except the frying pan has racist cartoons taped to the front.

Oh yeah, the racism. See, as off-putting and troubling as the cinematic nature of Coonskin is, it doesn’t have anything on the actual content of the damn movie. The characters, every one, are appalling indulgences of the most racist imagery imaginable.... 

 

How often does a film feel dangerous? For that matter, how often do you come across any kind of art that feels truly dangerous, truly transgressive? And I’m not talking about the giggling sort of illicit thrill that you get from juvenile revelry in ‘mature’ subjects, like your buddies in grade school showing drawings of boobs or whatever. I’m talking about art that feels like someone has truly gotten away with some sort of crime, like some invisible boundary has been irreparably breached and nothing can stop the flood waters from pouring in and levelling all that they cross.

There’s a charge, a very special sort of charge when you come across a film that gives you that feeling. I remember the first time I saw Videodrome, it felt wrong to be watching it, the end result being a feeling like some diseased new intelligence had slithered off the TV and crawled onto my skin, a hideous perspective sinking beneath the pores and setting off a cancerous chain of enlightenment. Not bad for a cheap-o horror flick where James Woods grows a vagina on his chest and drops a gun into it.

 

I’m sure every film fan reading this has a special list in their head of the films that had that sort of effect. Films that shook them, that shocked them, that conveyed images that seemed to blaze off the screen.

 

Coonskin is one of those films.

Released in 1975 under a variety of titles ranging from Coonskin to Bustin’ Out to Street Fight, the film was written and directed by Ralph Bakshi to serve the dual purpose of pushing adult-minded experimental animation as far as possible, and to tackle America’s history of race and segregation head-on, using a narrative that blends folklore with Blaxploitation films the imagery of horrific racial stereotypes.

It’s hard to even describe how unnerving the entire film is, from start to finish. To begin with, the merging of live action and animated elements is flat out bizarre and unsettling. Bakshi will do things like have a live action tracking shot representing a character’s first person POV of walking through actual NYC streets. But when the character enters a location and the film cuts to a third person perspective, the character is now animated. Still photographs serve as a backgrounds, while other sequences jarringly combine animated characters conversing with live action ones. And occasionally, Bakshi decides to just say “Fuck it” and indulge in mind-shreddingly insane freakouts and dream sequences, the cinematic equivalent of smashing the audience in the face with a frying pan over and over and over again. Except the frying pan has racist cartoons taped to the front.

 

Oh yeah, the racism. See, as off-putting and troubling as the cinematic nature of Coonskin is, it doesn’t have anything on the actual content of the damn movie. The characters, every one, are appalling indulgences of the most racist imagery imaginable. Look at this shit:

Every character is like that! And it’s not just black people being represented in this manner. Gay people, Jewish people, Italian people, all are depicted in that same outsized manner.

Ralph Bakshi claimed to be stunned when people were offended by the movie. Ralph Bakshi is a very foolish man.

 

He’s also a brilliant one. Looking at isolated screenshots, it would be easy to chalk Coonskin up as the most racist thing to exist since…ever. But that is not what Coonskin is, something which is apparent if you actually watch the film and engage with what Bakshi is attempting to do. Fueling the film from frame one is both satirical wit and righteous, blazing fury. Bakshi isn’t reveling or exploiting racist imagery, he’s ingesting every awful, poisonous hypocrisy within mass culture and then spewing it back into his audience’s face. He is taking the disgusting shame that companies like Disney and Warner Bros. have tried to bury and forget and dragging it into the cold light of day.

‘This is the culture you inherit,’ the film says. ‘Look at it. This is the iconography of race that this country has and continues to use. What the fuck are you going to do about it? Put it in a vault next to Song of the South and act like it never happened? Look at it.’

Bakshi’s satire is ugly and upsetting, but then you contrast it with actual footage from fucking Fantasia.

 

Over and over again the film depicts both the empowerment and dehumanization that can be found in an image. America is embodied in a large-breasted blonde woman clothed only in the colors of the flag, repeatedly seducing black men with promises of love and pleasure only to brutally murder them. The hero of the film, Brother Rabbit, repeatedly utilizes stereotypes to lure his enemies into a false sense of security before easily dispatching them."

 

https://cinapse.co/bakshis-coonskin-1975-is-a-must-watch-racial-satire-a5923ba596c

 

***

 

 

 

 

" Al Sharpton and the Congress of Racial Equality (CORE) went apeshit and picketed Coonskin before anyone in the organization had even seen the film. (Sharpton quipped “I don’t need to see shit to smell shit.”) Bakshi had hired a number of black animators to work on the film and the NAACP felt it was an important work but still Sharpton couldn’t resist the opportunity for some press. New York City theaters were smoke-bombed during screenings of Coonskin. Nationwide theaters panicked and cancelled bookings.The film’s distributor Paramount Pictures eventually freaked and pulled it from circulation. The positive reception from critics didn’t make up for the fact that most audiences, both black and white, just didn’t get it."

 

https://dangerousminds.net/comments/ralph_bakshis_animated_assault_on_racism_in_america_is_still_an_uncomp

 

 

***

 

 

 

 

 

" Animation icon Ralph Bakshi (Fritz the Cat, Coonskin, Wizards, Cool World) has never been afraid to push the envelope, and boy does he in Trickle Dickle Down, a new political short introducing his recently announced Bakshi Blues project. An announcement for the series declares, in no uncertain terms, "THERE IS NOWHERE FOR ANYONE TO HIDE." And how. Watch as Trickle Dickle Down takes aim at Mitt Romney with Bakshi's explosive take on trickle-down economics.

 

The series promises to "[look] at this new America with some great old characters and some great new characters in all new stories," and if Trickle Dickle Down is any indication, these are going to light up a few fires in the political blogosphere. The two-minute toon features a Stepin Fetchit-like character waxing ecstatic about Romney's America as he digs through garbage, packing plenty of controversy into a single scene.

 

And then comes the kicker at the 1:23 mark. Enjoy!"

 

 

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.yahoo.com/amphtml/entertainment/watch-ralph-bakshis-political-toon-trickle-dickle-down-182013408.html

 

  • Props 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Very spicy anti war propaganda by Veterans For Peace UK. http://vfpuk.org/

 

***

 

Veterans for Peace U.K.’s “Action Man: Battlefield Casualties” videos, which parody toy ads seen in the 1980s, shows children playing with PTSD Action Man, Paralysed Action Man, and Dead Action Man.

 

“No matter how bad anyone thinks this film is, the reality is worse. It’s not sick to show what actually happens in a war. It’s sick to convince people to join that war without telling them what’s possibly going to happen. Recruiting 16-year-olds into the army is sick,” artist Darren Cullen said Vice News reported Tuesday.

 

The group hopes to spotlight a program in the U.K. that allows 16-year-old males to be recruited into the military. Although those teenagers cannot deploy until they are 18, a study by ForcesWatch and Child Soldiers International found that they are twice as likely to die in combat as adult recruits.

 

“This is about prying open a crack in the spectacle of military propaganda. Warfare isn’t glamorous. The wars we fight are not noble causes,” said Ben Griffin, former SAS commando and founder of Veterans For Peace U.K., Vice News reported. “All of this propaganda is an attempt to recruit society to the idea that Britain has a noble and great military, and that we should use it. But there’s another side to that story.”

 

U.K. veteran Daniel Campbell agreed. He helped the Afghan army dispose of IEDs during his deployment to Afghanistan in 2012, but now suffers from PTSD and dreams about dead children he could not save.

 

“I am PTSD Action Man for all intents and purposes,” the veteran told Vice News. “I really qualified my role in Afghanistan as saying, ‘No, no. I’m actually making a difference here, I’m looking after civilians.’ But then civilians ended up dying anyway. I found that really difficult to cope with.”

 

***

 

Veterans for Peace (VFP) was founded in the United States of America in 1985 and has over 100 chapters in the USA and a growing number of international chapters.

 

Veterans for Peace UK (VFP UK) was founded in London in 2011.

 

Veterans For Peace UK is a voluntary and politically independent ex-services organisation of men and women who have served in conflicts from WW2 through to Afghanistan.

 

As a result of our collective experiences we firmly believe that “War is not the solution to the problems we face in the 21st century”.

 

We are not a pacifist organisation; we accept the inherent right of self-defence in response to an armed attack.

 

We work to influence the foreign and defence policy of the UK, for the larger purpose of world peace.

 

We urge all veterans who share this vision to join us.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

A man was being yanked around by his local govt and the family who runs his small town. He eventually hit his boiling point and went on an amazing rampage with a modified bulldozer. These tapes are his manifesto. 

 

 

***

 

This is a very well done Killdozer podcast by Love & Radio: http://loveandradio.org/2017/12/the-machine/

 

I recommend a listen. 

 

**

 

Marvin John Heemeyer (October 28, 1951 – June 4, 2004) was an American welder and an automobile muffler repair shop owner who demolished numerous buildings with a modified bulldozer in Granby, Colorado on June 4, 2004.

 

***

 

In addition to writings that he left on the wall of his shed, Heemeyer recorded a number of audio tapes explaining his motivation for the attack. He mailed these to his brother in South Dakota shortly before stepping into his bulldozer. Heemeyer's brother turned the tapes over to the FBI, who in turn sent them to the Grand County Sheriff's Department. The tapes were released by the Grand County Sheriff's Office on August 31, 2004. The tapes are about 2.5 hours in length.[19]

The first recording was made on April 13, 2004. The last recording was made 13 days before the rampage.[citation needed]

"God built me for this job," Heemeyer said in the first recording. He also said it was God's plan that he not be married or have a family so that he could be in a position to carry out such an attack. "I think God will bless me to get the machine done, to drive it, to do the stuff that I have to do," he said. "God blessed me in advance for the task that I am about to undertake. It is my duty. God has asked me to do this. It's a cross that I am going to carry and I'm carrying it in God's name."[20]

Investigators later found Heemeyer's handwritten list of targets. According to the police, it included the buildings he destroyed, the local Catholic church (which he did not damage), and the names of various people who had sided against him in past disputes.[21]

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marvin_Heemeyer

 

 

***

 

killdozer_news.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Mr Bungle - Travolta

 

Music video banned for being too disturbing. Mr Bungle was an experimental project by Faith No More frontman, Mike Patton. 

 

***

 

Although the song was originally titled "Travolta", it was quickly changed to "Quote Unquote" due to legal threats.[4] A music video was made for "Travolta", using its later title "Quote Unquote". The video was banned from MTV due to images of the band members (dressed in various costumes and masks) hanging from meat hooks and overall scary, disturbing images.[5] The video used the single version of the song.[6]

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Travolta_(song)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

 

 

SEASON 2013: EPISODE 2
 

The National Football League, a multibillion-dollar commercial juggernaut, presides over America’s indisputable national pastime. But the NFL is under assault: thousands of former players have claimed the league tried to cover up how football inflicted long-term brain injuries on many players. What did the NFL know, and when did it know it? In a special two-hour investigation, FRONTLINE reveals the hidden story of the NFL and brain injuries.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...


 

 

The 2007 Boston Mooninite panic occurred on Wednesday, January 31, 2007, after the Boston Police Department and the Boston Fire Departmentmistakenly identified battery-powered LED placards depicting the Mooninites, characters from the Adult Swim animated television series Aqua Teen Hunger Force, as improvised explosive devices.[1][2] Placed throughout Boston, Massachusetts, and the surrounding cities of Cambridge and Somerville, these devices were part of a guerrilla marketingadvertising campaign for Aqua Teen Hunger Force Colon Movie Film for Theaters, a film based on Aqua Teen Hunger Force.[2]

 

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007_Boston_Mooninite_panic

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...