Eastcoast Killa Posted January 22, 2002 Share Posted January 22, 2002 Graff isnt about murals, ART is about murals. Graffiti is about bombing and tags and getting up and style and all that, and about fun. Murals and legals become a part of graff for some people, but calling yourself a writer because you paint murals is utter bullshit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SatansArtist Posted January 22, 2002 Share Posted January 22, 2002 hmm i would have to disagree with what #2 said cause its like this... graff is vandalism no matter what.. and tagging is most likely more to be vandalism.. thats why you shouldnt tag you should bomb and as for murals they get dissed by taggers or busted over within days...so yeah why spend all that time when you can bomb?....... A to the G........:D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
giantone Posted January 23, 2002 Share Posted January 23, 2002 A wildstyle does not achieve it's full potential unless it's done at night, just like a tag or a throw-up. Dayspots can be fun, but I really think they should be seen as practice, or a cheap way to get seen. The essence of writing graffiti is PUBLIC, not backwoods spots that no regular person would ever find. GIANT - BA, Skullz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hbg Posted January 23, 2002 Share Posted January 23, 2002 murals is what brings out the true meaning of graffiti. what!!!! bombing is how it all started man. if you dont bomb then you aint no writer. getting up that is what graff is all about. because before people were doing pieces, permission walls, productions and all that they were bombing. bombing is how it all started . bombing is how everyone starts. with out bombing there would be no graffiti BOMBING IS THE TRUE MEANING OF GRAFF Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
graffsurgeon Posted January 23, 2002 Share Posted January 23, 2002 Re: strike that, reverse it Originally posted by bodice_ripper hence I don't ever get along with writers, dont get me wrong - Its up to you but I personally have that in reverse and dont give me that "youre a pussy" bullshit, I bomb too, but it has less meaning for me - mind you, who says it cant be bombing AND artsy? thats terrific. it is artsy to me but not to the sculptor fags around the way. i personally dont give a fuck what you think of my shit. i do my shit to release anger.boredom.creativity mad shit..i like bombing alot more then pieces but bombing definitly couldent be taken as artsy if it was in any non writers eyes..who gives a fuck if it is anyways..im just doing my thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bodice_ripper Posted January 23, 2002 Share Posted January 23, 2002 Re: Re: strike that, reverse it Originally posted by graffsurgeon thats terrific. it is artsy to me but not to the sculptor fags around the way. i personally dont give a fuck what you think of my shit. i do my shit to release anger.boredom.creativity mad shit..i like bombing alot more then pieces but bombing definitly couldent be taken as artsy if it was in any non writers eyes..who gives a fuck if it is anyways..im just doing my thing. your reading clearly isn't the best, so I'll give you a hand: I SAID IT'S UP TO YOU PERSONALLY geez man, I know its a bitch having your period, but try to calm down....................................................I never said ANYTHING about your shit - i personally dont give a fuck what YOU think of your shit. Settle down Beavis :crazy: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I Luv Roo Posted April 26, 2003 Share Posted April 26, 2003 Originally posted by giantone A wildstyle does not achieve it's full potential unless it's done at night, just like a tag or a throw-up. Dayspots can be fun, but I really think they should be seen as practice, or a cheap way to get seen. The essence of writing graffiti is PUBLIC, not backwoods spots that no regular person would ever find. GIANT - BA, Skullz Yeah, those day spots get you noticed by really cool people like Susan Farrell of ArtCrimes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Overtime Posted April 27, 2003 Share Posted April 27, 2003 i dont think that murals bring out the true meaning of graffiti, it started with gettin your name up, so how can murals be the true meaning? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest deas Posted April 27, 2003 Share Posted April 27, 2003 bombing is nice but i like that gratification that comes with a production or a peice thats why peice is taken from "masterpeice" because it's your sistene chapel its your work of art you spend hours sometimes working on it it makes you feel good to see it when it's finished Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asid Posted April 27, 2003 Share Posted April 27, 2003 Originally posted by aret Bombing in my opinion is what's making the community think of graffiti as more of vandalism than a work of art. There isn't anything wrong with bombing but murals is what brings out the true meaning of graffiti. I would say that bombing is more vandalism than murals. What do u dorks out there think?? Bob Marley is King AE..Abnormal Erections yea bombing on top of murals is great... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daze One Million Posted April 27, 2003 Share Posted April 27, 2003 Originally posted by I Luv Roo Yeah, those day spots get you noticed by really cool people like Susan Farrell of ArtCrimes. you brought this thread back just to say that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coolcon2 Posted April 28, 2003 Share Posted April 28, 2003 Originally posted by try me. i got into graff because of the anti media approach of bombing, but i see bolth artists and bombers needing to unite to keep graff strong. artists and bombers rah rah rah!!!! here we go bombers here we go clap clap :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EasoeDSF Posted April 28, 2003 Share Posted April 28, 2003 If it aint illegal i'm not as interested. I like a nice piece...but I personally like to see a door crushed to shit with tags than someones pretty little legal wall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daze One Million Posted April 28, 2003 Share Posted April 28, 2003 to go along with what the guy above me said, as long as its done well....theres nothing more unattractive, to me anyway, than a wall covered in wak tags, graffiti isnt about art or destruction, to me its about style....and it doesnt matter how you use it wether it be illegal or legal, the manipulation of letters is graffiti, the way you choose to express your manipulation is up to you... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
active707 Posted April 30, 2003 Share Posted April 30, 2003 and to go along with; and to go along with what the guy above me said. style is most important.thats what separates. some stuff needs to be buffed throws with style, in the right spots. finley crafted handstyles... well respected... bombing is the heart of graf. anyone can paint a legal. the risks and style, also placement of throws & hands is what earns the points. its just a diff. way of livin. fuck permission:krunk: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
conpe Posted April 30, 2003 Share Posted April 30, 2003 bombing is the bomb as with what has been said i agree with most of it pieces and shit were started with bombs what more do you want, what i hate is stupid little fucken 12 years olds thinking there top shit and just doing there shitty little tags all over the place fucken ugly as and they piss me off cause most of them are shit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.