Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

TheoHuxtable..


DRUNKEN-ASSHOLE-ONER
 Share

Recommended Posts

This forum is supported by the 12ozProphet Shop, so go buy a shirt and help support!
This forum is brought to you by the 12ozProphet Shop.
This forum is brought to you by the 12oz Shop.
  • Replies 115
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

They are still over 2000 actual engineers and architects who know what the fuck they are talking about.

You can spin it any way you want, but it's not like every kid out of high school goes through the education that is needed to become a civil engineer or an architect.

Your original argument was that I don't have an engineering degree.

Well then, here's over 2000 mother fuckers who actually do who agree 100% with what I've been saying since day one.

 

And your delayed argument to that is to latch onto the same right wing asshole form Arizona that we used to both agree was a fucking idiot's "Glenn Beck" rantings???

Seriously???

 

 

There are 2,000 engineers & architects who believe in wild conspiracies, because having a degree in a field doesn't absolve you from believing in crazy conspiracy theories. They are still human. But there are millions of engineers & architects who have not joined the "truth" movement.

 

I don't believe I ever said anything about you not having an engineering degree. I think you have me confused with the 30 other people you were arguing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are 2,000 engineers & architects who believe in wild conspiracies, because having a degree in a field doesn't absolve you from believing in crazy conspiracy theories. They are still human. But there are millions of engineers & architects who have not joined the "truth" movement.

 

I don't believe I ever said anything about you not having an engineering degree. I think you have me confused with the 30 other people you were arguing with.

 

Do you have any idea the level of education and brainpower that it takes to become a civil engineer much less an architect?

Civil engineering and architecture are not a dime a dozen careers where that mathematical equation of millions of their colleges rebutting them would even be possible.

2000 actual well educated engineers and architects is a large number of people who know way more about what the fuck they are talking about than you fucking internet trolls who knee-jerk just believe what the fuck you are told to believe, no matter how fucking delusional you have to be to ignore what is right in front of your face and that you don't have to have a fucking engineering degree to see through.

 

But that said, here is 2000 people who actually DO have those credentials confirming what people like ME have been saying all along.

 

And the entire argument all along from you fucking sheep has been "you're not an engineer, you're not an architect, what do you know?"

Well then here is the counter argument to that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you made this thread because you were going through "argument withdrawals" since the 9/11 thread had died down. So you needed to restart an argument. You need another argument in the same fashion that a crackhead needs another hit.

 

For the record, the NIST report, which gives the official explanation behind the collapse of the World Trade Center, was created by structural engineers, architects, and scientists. They have degrees in those very fields, yet, you don't believe what they say.

 

So your argument that less than 1% of all engineers & architects are conspiracy loons means we should agree with them because they have a degree doesn't hold water.

 

In the earlier thread, you used the common Truther strawman argument that the official report claims that "jet fuel fires" collapsed the buildings, and. But the official report never said jet fuel fires collapsed the buildings. Jet fuel burns up relatively quickly. Most of the fire you saw burning was the result of the building itself burning -- carpeting, drywall, furniture, wood, oils, etc.

 

Secondly another strawman argument used by Truthers is that "the fire was not hot enough to melt steel." Melting temp for steel is at about 2,500 degrees F.

 

For a building to collapse, the steel doesn't have to melt, just weaken. Steel will weaken at a much lower temperature in under 1,000 degrees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But that said, here is 2000 people who actually DO have those credentials confirming what people like ME have been saying all along.

 

I don't think anything has been confirmed, has it? This (very small) group of engineers are calling for investigations rather than saying something definitely occurred. But if you mean confirming that there are suspicions, well ok then, but I think everyone already know that some people were suspicious, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you made this thread because you were going through "argument withdrawals" since the 9/11 thread had died down.

 

Nah, I made it because you refused to comment on what I posted in the 911 thread in response to you trying to play me like a sucker.

And then you still refused to respond with anything serious in this thread until getting called out for posting nonsense instead of answers to what I posted after your attempts to play me like a sucker in the 911 thread.

Try again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

In the earlier thread, you used the common Truther strawman argument that the official report claims that "jet fuel fires" collapsed the buildings, and. But the official report never said jet fuel fires collapsed the buildings. Jet fuel burns up relatively quickly. Most of the fire you saw burning was the result of the building itself burning -- carpeting, drywall, furniture, wood, oils, etc.

 

No, that was your argument that it was jet fuel that caused the fire in building 7 that was not even hit by a plane.

My argument was that building 7 was never hit by a plane in the first place.

Regardless, every single building in America is built with fireproof materials and sprinklers just in case.

So then if we are both agreeing that it wasn't jet fuel that caused the so called fire in building 7 that somehow brought it down in the same exact fashion as a controlled demolition, then WHAT THE FUCK DID???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think anything has been confirmed, has it? This (very small) group of engineers are calling for investigations rather than saying something definitely occurred. But if you mean confirming that there are suspicions, well ok then, but I think everyone already know that some people were suspicious, right?

 

So then does your boss have to confirm a false flag before you're allowed to admit that it happened?

Is that how it works?

 

Don't forget, I'm not the only person on here who you told what you do for a living.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, that was your argument that it was jet fuel that caused the fire in building 7 that was not even hit by a plane.

 

Never said that. Can you find where I said that? I said WTC 7's fire was caused by thousands of tons of chunks of WTC 1 slamming in to it during its collapse; there were various floors in Building 7 with electrical & gas generators which combusted.

 

 

My argument was that building 7 was never hit by a plane in the first place.

Regardless, every single building in America is built with fireproof materials and sprinklers just in case.

So then if we are both agreeing that it wasn't jet fuel that caused the so called fire in building 7 that somehow brought it down in the same exact fashion as a controlled demolition, then WHAT THE FUCK DID???

 

 

I just told you for the second time -- the fires in Building 7 were caused by generators which exploded on multiple floors as a result of thousands of tons of WTC 1's steel & concrete falling in to WTC 7.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nah, I made it because you refused to comment on what I posted in the 911 thread in response to you trying to play me like a sucker.

And then you still refused to respond with anything serious in this thread until getting called out for posting nonsense instead of answers to what I posted after your attempts to play me like a sucker in the 911 thread.

Try again.

 

All of your assumptions are wrong. No one was trying to "play" you, I was just explaining what the official story was in the midst of all your strawman arguments.

 

I also lost interest in the thread (as did everyone else), and hadn't even posted for a couple days until I saw this thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You being noob fail to realize that I already know who this guy and his last handfull of screen names is.

 

You should really just fall back for a while and observe before jumping the gun and chiming in.

 

Food for thought.

 

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

 

You alright there love?

 

I think you take the internet way too seriously my friend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eh,

I have peers with civil and structural engineering degrees. Dated one actually, whose sister was as well. Obviously intelligent people, and I've never heard either of them begin to give weight to this tin hat horse shit. I think I only know of one of them who is working in their field, too... like most college graduates. I also recall correcting basic grammar mistakes on papers for my ex in her Junior year... degrees don't necessarily mean shit.

 

sexcauldron's post with the statistics laid out the only perspective needed to negate your logic.

 

I can't fathom how worthless I'd feel if i wasted as much time + energy on ANY internet forum, especially this one, as you have. Perhaps that is at the root of this never ending quest to be the most right, toughest, realest, cleverest internet personality.

 

It's like the final frontier, having failed the reality part of life, and you're not going quietly.

 

now go 'cite' something i said ~three years ago and make me look bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...