Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...
Pfffffffffft

TRAYVON vs. ZIMMERMAN

Recommended Posts

he just looks like a huge faggot. maybe if he didn't i wouldn't have wanted him to be found guilty so much. what he has left of his life, before he gets killed, will probably be spent in fear so that's pretty cool.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The prosecution threw the case away Rachel Jeantel became their star witness. That was hard to watch. She was incoherent and downright dim, and should never have been allowed anywhere near the stand. They had a highly regarded forensic specialist state that Zimmerman's wounds were consistent with Trayvon being on top. The photos didn't look like something self-inflicted, but conspiracy theorists will be use anything they can. There were photos of guns in Trayvon's phone (which were nearly kept secret). He had been suspended from school for possessing stolen jewelry. Obviously not the most clean cut of kids. Utter bullshit that they managed to portray him as such an innocent child.

I knew a couple hoodrat kids from my apartment in Oakland who were ~15yo and were doing plenty of dirt. Straps and drugs and whatnot. Even now, i'm not sure i'd want to squab with any of them, even one on one. And if one of them got me pinned and was genuinely angry, no doubt i'd use any weapon i had on me. Those youngsters were vicious.

 

Doubt plagues me on both sides of this case, and with that said, if i were on the jury i'd never have been able to say Zimmerman was guilty of second degree murder beyond a reasonable doubt.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you could put a value on life, today shows how much trayvon's was worth.

 

My dude can't come back over some bullshit!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fuckshit. Can't wait for everyone to play themselves for weeks "responding" to this while kids continue to die.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The prosecution threw the case away Rachel Jeantel became their star witness. That was hard to watch. She was incoherent and downright dim, and should never have been allowed anywhere near the stand. They had a highly regarded forensic specialist state that Zimmerman's wounds were consistent with Trayvon being on top. The photos didn't look like something self-inflicted, but conspiracy theorists will be use anything they can. There were photos of guns in Trayvon's phone (which were nearly kept secret). He had been suspended from school for possessing stolen jewelry. Obviously not the most clean cut of kids. Utter bullshit that they managed to portray him as such an innocent child.

I knew a couple hoodrat kids from my apartment in Oakland who were ~15yo and were doing plenty of dirt. Straps and drugs and whatnot. Even now, i'm not sure i'd want to squab with any of them, even one on one. And if one of them got me pinned and was genuinely angry, no doubt i'd use any weapon i had on me. Those youngsters were vicious.

 

Doubt plagues me on both sides of this case, and with that said, if i were on the jury i'd never have been able to say Zimmerman was guilty of second degree murder beyond a reasonable doubt.

 

Rachel Jeantel is a damn embarrassment. Here's why:

 

1.) Saying "that's retawwded" in a courtroom on national TV.

 

2.) 19-years-old in high school.

 

3.) Can't read "cursive."

 

4.) Looks and talks like Precious.

 

5.) Saying there's nothing "racist" about calling a White person a "cracka" and that it's just normal everyday talk. At least have the common sense not to admit it. White people who use the N-word won't admit they use it in public.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Couldn't have happened in a better state as far as Zimmerman is concerned.....Florida, Indiana, Michigan and I don't know where else...The "no retreat" law, or ""castle doctrine" seem to be the go to for anyone involved in these type of situations....

 

Bear Arms? no man Bare Arms.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It all comes down to what can be proved beyond a reasonable doubt, and the prosecution didn't do that.

 

The fact of the matter is dude should have never put himself in that situation in the first place.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sad case either way. Both seemed like decent people. I'm not going to give into all the propaganda against either of them. That Zimmerman was racist or that Trayvon was a criminal. On a positive note through all the talk in the media and online you see a lot of true colors in people and see the bigotry people have..on the left and the right. not really positive but a clear sign that there is some serious shit that's wrong with this country.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This pretty much sums it up.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A minority shoots a minority, welcome to every 5 minutes in America.

This only made the press because the Hispanic dude had a Jewy last name.

 

The only things shocking here are:

1. The media making the Hispanic into a white guy.

2. The black kid (6'3" adult) had a father in his life.

3. Anyone who thought the prosecution had case (what a waste of time & tax dollars.)

 

Black man, black woman, black baby

White man, white woman, white baby

White man, black woman, black baby

Black man, white woman, black baby

Brown man, Jew name, white media

 

 

 

 

Florida people.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

half Peruvian..

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

mqdefault.jpg

"den diplo was all like 'wikawikawooshmakedatbootyclap' guurl shaquiranda wuz twerkinn"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

While I'm not pleased that Zimmy isn't being charged with anything, it seems based on Florida law and the piss-poor show of the prosecution that the not guilty verdict is fair enough.

 

 

The real bullshit here is all the other killings of unarmed minority youth by cops and vigilantes that get no media coverage at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not a big fan of Molyneux, but he did a good job explaining everything with out all the bullshit and it's hard to find a reliable and unbias media source..

but then again stefbot might be a little bit bias but still fair

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The prosecution threw the case away Rachel Jeantel became their star witness. That was hard to watch. She was incoherent and downright dim, and should never have been allowed anywhere near the stand. They had a highly regarded forensic specialist state that Zimmerman's wounds were consistent with Trayvon being on top. The photos didn't look like something self-inflicted, but conspiracy theorists will be use anything they can. There were photos of guns in Trayvon's phone (which were nearly kept secret). He had been suspended from school for possessing stolen jewelry. Obviously not the most clean cut of kids. Utter bullshit that they managed to portray him as such an innocent child.

I knew a couple hoodrat kids from my apartment in Oakland who were ~15yo and were doing plenty of dirt. Straps and drugs and whatnot. Even now, i'm not sure i'd want to squab with any of them, even one on one. And if one of them got me pinned and was genuinely angry, no doubt i'd use any weapon i had on me. Those youngsters were vicious.

 

Doubt plagues me on both sides of this case, and with that said, if i were on the jury i'd never have been able to say Zimmerman was guilty of second degree murder beyond a reasonable doubt.

 

 

 

That's because you're a faggot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Rachel Jeantel is a damn embarrassment. Here's why:

 

1.) Saying "that's retawwded" in a courtroom on national TV.

 

2.) 19-years-old in high school.

 

3.) Can't read "cursive."

 

4.) Looks and talks like Precious.

 

5.) Saying there's nothing "racist" about calling a White person a "cracka" and that it's just normal everyday talk. At least have the common sense not to admit it. White people who use the N-word won't admit they use it in public.

 

She was probably the most honest person speaking in that court room.

Slang and "hood ratness" aside, she was just keeping it real.

Anybody who dismisses her testimony because of her accent and slang instead of actually listening to what she had to say is an ignorant racist.

Which is exactly why they filled the jury with redneck white women.

 

And didn't they stop teaching cursive years ago?

I was taught cursive in 3rd grade, and I still can't read any of these stack of old letters from my grandparents that are in a box in my closet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It all comes down to what can be proved beyond a reasonable doubt, and the prosecution didn't do that.

 

The fact of the matter is dude should have never put himself in that situation in the first place.

 

The fact that he put himself in that situation in the first place is exactly what proves beyond a reasonable doubt that it was 2nd degree murder.

You don't just go picking fights that you can't handle, then pull out and blast when the fight doesn't go your way.

That's not "self defense", that's the definition of 2nd degree murder.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×