Jump to content

ex-cop on cop killing spree in CA (R.I.P. Christopher Dorner)


KILZ FILLZ

Recommended Posts

This forum is supported by the 12ozProphet Shop, so go buy a shirt and help support!
This forum is brought to you by the 12ozProphet Shop.
This forum is brought to you by the 12oz Shop.
  • Replies 318
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

DoMe!;8657752']LAPD is in many considerations its own force. Although a force sponsored by the State and canonized in our justice system, they take matters in their own hands regarding renegades that target them.

 

To some perspectives they're justified enacting the oldest style of justice. To others they're seen as their own gang organization operating to their own advantage and intent.

 

This was the whole reason Dorner went off. He demonstrated with cruelty the personal justice some officers and generally some people with power can do for their own personal scores. Justifying a deadly crime with personal greivances is already abuse of power, but corruption, if this was his twisted point, is when that abuse of power is protected, abedded, and covered up by others in the department which represents or is supposed to represent a system and due process to uphold order.

 

The LAPD has already been shown to have broken the law. It has also not been made to answer for the issues brought up by Dorner. His madness and murder spree cannot be made to diminish the violations committed by the department.

 

Most clearly of which that was not even mentioned on Dorner's "manifesto" is the use of aggressive force against citizens in the search for Dorner. There must be an investigation against the department as to who or why there could be allowed a deadly assault against innocents with so little to indicate it could be the suspect, and why the LAPD would act so cavalier even in the face of a severely deadly threat to the LAPD exclusively.

 

Was this an act of fearful self defense? That could be understandable, but by no means inexcusable. If those women were wounded there should be some more coverage as to their treatment and whether they at least were compensated.

 

 

 

 

 

@"did not read lool". I know. You are still all the more insignificant for not being able to.

 

"If those women were wounded there should be some more coverage as to their treatment and whether they at least were compensated."

 

so if they weren't wounded but simply swiss cheesed the fuck up whilst delivering the daily news it wouldn't be an issue?

fuck outta my face

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...