Jump to content

Shooting at Batman screen in Colorado.


Malin

Recommended Posts

what possible conspiracy theories could be conceived about this situation? the guys was a fucking cornball, who went so far as to die his hair red and call himself the joker. who purposefully becomes a ginger?

 

this whole story needs to fuck off and people need to let the families do their mourning in private, I personally don't need any more coverage than what I got at 7am when I woke and caught the headlines on the am news. not where he acquired the guns from, who he talked to, whats inside his apartment, a reenactment of his moves that night. none of that information would enhance my life one bit.

 

fuck this guy to hell, should have turned one on himself like those columbine faggots

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This forum is supported by the 12ozProphet Shop, so go buy a shirt and help support!
This forum is brought to you by the 12ozProphet Shop.
This forum is brought to you by the 12oz Shop.
  • Replies 414
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

what possible conspiracy theories could be conceived about this situation? the guys was a fucking cornball, who went so far as to die his hair red and call himself the joker. who purposefully becomes a ginger?

 

this whole story needs to fuck off and people need to let the families do their mourning in private, I personally don't need any more coverage than what I got at 7am when I woke and caught the headlines on the am news. not where he acquired the guns from, who he talked to, whats inside his apartment, a reenactment of his moves that night. none of that information would enhance my life one bit.

 

fuck this guy to hell, should have turned one on himself like those columbine faggots

 

 

 

Lets see... dude walks into movie theater dressed in swat gear and armed with military style weapons and bucks 80 or so people killing 12.

Government hides dudes identity.

If you can't see an avalanche of conspiracy theories coming out of that scenario, espescially in this day and age, then you're a fucking retard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont know if you're a minority or a bleeding heart, but I find your stand point hilarious, and delusional.

 

The whole notion of ''he's white so he gets a pass'' is farcical, how exactly is he getting off?

He will spend the rest of his breathing days in a 5x5 cell in the middle of nowhere until he rots, and more than likely he'll be put to death.

 

Neither of those options seem to be a pass to me.

 

As far as it being an act of terrorism, as Real said an act of terror involves a political agenda and the perpetrator carries out an act that will cause fear in hopes that demands are made or a point gets across.

 

This nutjob might of had somekind of twisted manifesto or ''movement'' in his head, but I highly doubt it. Seems to be another case of a fucking lunatic that can't handle life(even though he was set the fuck up, poor little bitch) and took out his angst, frustration and depression on what he saw as ''the world/society.''

 

 

 

delusional?!

so the crowded cinema of people were not terrified for their fucking life?! they were terrorized as shit!

 

you dont need a political agenda to be terrorized or cause terror..

dude killed 12 people and injured 71 others.. he is a homeland terrorist.

 

the media and government wants you to think "terrorist" have an agenda to add merit to the unneeded and unjust wars. "how dare them do something like that to OUR people!!!"""

 

look, we have assholes right here in the USA who are capable and are DOING the same shit!

and nobody wants to admit it, why? because they are one of US

 

thats the cop out!!

 

You, yourself just said exactly what i originally said... hahahah "Seems to be another case of a fucking lunatic that can't handle life(even though he was set the fuck up, poor little bitch) and took out his angst, frustration and depression on what he saw as ''the world/society.''...

 

cop out!

 

now go back to your couch and watch more news to get programmed

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lets see... dude walks into movie theater dressed in swat gear and armed with military style weapons and bucks 80 or so people killing 12.

Government hides dudes identity.

If you can't see an avalanche of conspiracy theories coming out of that scenario, espescially in this day and age, then you're a fucking retard.

 

 

 

how is the govt hiding dudes identity? his face and name have been on the web and tv news hours since late yesterday morning??

 

no conspiracy here, they're probably only downplaying his identity so as not to give him his undeserved fame and/or protect his family from nuts seeking retribution.

 

even if they were concocting a conspiracy what the fuck could it possibly be? there was no political/social aspects to this, it wasn't an abortion clinic, none of the victims were senators, and his middle name isn't hussein. don't be a fucking retard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

delusional?!

so the crowded cinema of people were not terrified for their fucking life?! they were terrorized as shit!

 

you dont need a political agenda to be terrorized or cause terror..

dude killed 12 people and injured 71 others.. he is a homeland terrorist.

 

the media and government wants you to think "terrorist" have an agenda to add merit to the unneeded and unjust wars. "how dare them do something like that to OUR people!!!"""

 

look, we have assholes right here in the USA who are capable and are DOING the same shit!

and nobody wants to admit it, why? because they are one of US

 

thats the cop out!!

 

You, yourself just said exactly what i originally said... hahahah "Seems to be another case of a fucking lunatic that can't handle life(even though he was set the fuck up, poor little bitch) and took out his angst, frustration and depression on what he saw as ''the world/society.''...

 

cop out!

 

now go back to your couch and watch more news to get programmed

 

No, you are 100% wrong.

 

Terrorism is the use of fear to coerce a particular reaction.

 

You blow up a bus, send a message of "make abortion illegal or I will blow up another bus". This is terrorism because because you are using the public's fear of blowing up to force a particular policy from the govt - to ban abortion.

 

If it was just a simple act of blowing up a bus to kill people, it's a crime but not an act of terror. Terrorism is the use of fear as a means.

 

 

There is no universal definition of terrorism. Some say a state cannot be considered a terrorist (look up the Jaccobin courts or 'Stalin's terror'), some say that it has to be specifically a political demand (if the demand is financial then it is extortion, not terrorism according to that argument), or that the attack must be on civilians, not soldiers or police (this argument says that attacks directly on the govt are simply an act of war and that terrorism must create fear and disruption in the public to create pressure on the govt to act in their protection).

 

However there is pretty much universal agreement that terrorism is the use of fear to coerce a particular reaction from your target (the people you hurt are not your actual target, the people who set the policies are your target, you just use the people you hurt to make your target do what you want).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And hey, Whilst I'm bombing this thread with shit no one will read, here's whoooooooole pages on domestic terrorism in the US..., you know, people who blow up animal testing labs, abortion clinics and govt offices that are not named Mahmoud and Habib!!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Domestic Terrorism

Focus on Militia Extremism

 

 

http://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/2011/september/militia_092211/

09/22/11

Seized cache of guns

A cache of guns seized from militia extremists

 

 

Last March, nine members of an extremist militia group were charged in Michigan with seditious conspiracy and attempted use of weapons of mass destruction in connection with an alleged plot to attack law enforcement and spark an uprising against the government.

 

According to the federal indictment, the nine individuals planned to kill a law enforcement officer and then use bombs to attack the caravan of cars taking part in the subsequent funeral procession, hoping that this violence would incite a larger armed conflict with authorities. Fortunately, the FBI and the Michigan State Police intervened and took the subjects into custody before they could carry out their alleged plot.

 

It’s just one example of the dangers posed by so-called militia extremists—the latest topic in our series to educate the nation on domestic terror threats that the FBI investigates today. Previous stories have focused on anarchist extremists, eco-terrorists/animal rights extremists, lone offenders, and sovereign citizen extremists.

 

Who they are. Like many domestic terrorism groups, militia extremists are anti-government. What sets them apart is that they’re often organized into paramilitary groups that follow a military-style rank hierarchy. They tend to stockpile illegal weapons and ammunition, trying illegally to get their hands on fully automatic firearms or attempting to convert weapons to fully automatic. They also try to buy or manufacture improvised explosive devices and typically engage in wilderness, survival, or other paramilitary training.

 

Who and what they target. They usually go after the government itself—including law enforcement personnel, representatives of the courts, and other public officials, along with government buildings. When caught, most militia extremists are charged with weapons, explosives, and/or conspiracy violations.

 

What they believe in. Many militia extremists view themselves as protecting the U.S. Constitution, other U.S. laws, or their own individual liberties. They believe that the Constitution grants citizens the power to take back the federal government by force or violence if they feel it’s necessary. They oppose gun control efforts and fear the widespread disarming of Americans by the federal government.

 

Militia extremists often subscribe to various conspiracy theories regarding government. One of their primary theories is that the United Nations—which they refer to as the New World Order, or NWO—has the right to use its military forces anywhere in the world (it doesn’t, of course). The extremists often train and prepare for what they foresee as an inevitable invasion of the U.S. by United Nations forces. Many militia extremists also wrongly believe that the federal government will relocate citizens to camps controlled by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, or force them to undergo vaccinations.

 

One important note: simply espousing anti-government rhetoric is not against the law. However, seeking to advance that ideology through force or violence is illegal, and that’s when the FBI and law enforcement become involved.

 

What is the FBI doing to combat the militia extremism threat? In addition to our lawful use of sophisticated investigative techniques, we’ve expanded our work with other federal agencies such as the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives and with our state and local partners. And we use intelligence and analysis to help identify gaps in our knowledge, emerging tactics and trends, and effective investigative strategies.

 

As always, the combination of intelligence, coordinated law enforcement efforts, and an informed public is the most effective way to counter the threats posed by domestic extremists.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Domestic Terrorism

The Sovereign Citizen Movement

 

 

http://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/2010/april/sovereigncitizens_041310

04/13/10

license_plates.jpg

Some examples of illegal license plates used by so-called sovereign citizens.

 

Domestic terrorism—Americans attacking Americans because of U.S.-based extremist ideologies—comes in many forms in our post 9/11 world.

 

To help educate the public, we’ve previously outlined two separate domestic terror threats—eco-terrorists/animal rights extremists and lone offenders.

 

Today, we look at a third threat—the “sovereign citizen” extremist movement. Sovereign citizens are anti-government extremists who believe that even though they physically reside in this country, they are separate or “sovereign” from the United States. As a result, they believe they don’t have to answer to any government authority, including courts, taxing entities, motor vehicle departments, or law enforcement.

 

This causes all kinds of problems—and crimes. For example, many sovereign citizens don’t pay their taxes. They hold illegal courts that issue warrants for judges and police officers. They clog up the court system with frivolous lawsuits and liens against public officials to harass them. And they use fake money orders, personal checks, and the like at government agencies, banks, and businesses.

 

That’s just the beginning. Not every action taken in the name of the sovereign citizen ideology is a crime, but the list of illegal actions committed by these groups, cells, and individuals is extensive (and puts them squarely on our radar). In addition to the above, sovereign citizens:

 

Commit murder and physical assault;

Threaten judges, law enforcement professionals, and government personnel;

Impersonate police officers and diplomats;

Use fake currency, passports, license plates, and driver’s licenses; and

Engineer various white-collar scams, including mortgage fraud and so-called “redemption” schemes.

 

Sovereign citizens are often confused with extremists from the militia movement. But while sovereign citizens sometimes use or buy illegal weapons, guns are secondary to their anti-government, anti-tax beliefs. On the other hand, guns and paramilitary training are paramount to militia groups.

 

During the past year, we’ve had a number of investigative successes involving sovereign citizens. A few recent cases:

 

In Sacramento, two sovereign citizens were convicted of running a fraudulent insurance scheme. Operating outside state insurance regulatory guidelines, the men set up their own company and sold “lifetime memberships” to customers, promising to pay any accident claims against their “members.” The company collected millions of dollars, but paid out very few claims. More

In Kansas City, three sovereign citizens were convicted of taking part in a conspiracy using phony diplomatic credentials. They charged customers between $450 and $2,000 for a diplomatic identification card, which would bestow upon the holder “sovereign” status—meaning they would enjoy diplomatic immunity from paying taxes and from being stopped or arrested by law enforcement. More

In Las Vegas, four men affiliated with the sovereign citizen movement were arrested by the Nevada Joint Terrorism Task Force on federal money laundering, tax evasion, and weapons charges. The investigation involved an undercover operation, with two of the suspects allegedly laundering more than a million dollars from what they believed was a bank fraud scheme. More

 

You can help. First, “be crime smart”—don’t fall for the bogus claims and scams of sovereign citizens. And second, if you have information on any suspicious activities or crimes, please contact us.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Putting Intel to Work

Against ELF and ALF Terrorists

 

 

http://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/2008/june/ecoterror_063008

06/30/08

 

In early 2006, eco-terrorist Eric McDavid and two associates met in a secluded cabin in Dutch Flat, California to discuss making improvised explosive devices and to choose targets to bomb. Soon after, they began casing the targeted facilities and buying supplies to make bombs. But before they started mixing the ingredients, we swooped in and arrested them.

 

How did we know what McDavid was up to? How were we able to prevent attacks that could have caused thousands or millions of dollars in property damage and possibly harmed people?

 

In a word, intelligence.

 

Our intelligence—which included the use of an FBI source who was actually with McDavid and his associates inside that California cabin—allowed us to piece together the entire plot ahead of time.

 

Since 9/11, we have greatly strengthened our ability to identify, collect, analyze, and share intelligence across all of our national security and criminal priorities. And that has carried over into our investigations of violence and terror committed in the name of the environment—as well as of animal rights.

 

Together, eco-terrorists and animal rights extremists are one of the most serious domestic terrorism threats in the U.S. today…for several good reasons:

 

The sheer volume of their crimes (over 2,000 since 1979);

The huge economic impact (losses of more than $110 million since 1979);

The wide range of victims (from international corporations to lumber companies to animal testing facilities to genetic research firms); and

Their increasingly violent rhetoric and tactics (one recent communiqué sent to a California product testing company said: “You might be able to protect your buildings, but can you protect the homes of every employee?”).

 

ELF and ALF are probably the names you’re most familiar with. The Earth Liberation Front (ELF) and the Animal Liberation Front (ALF) are loosely-organized movements whose adherents engage in crimes like arson, fire bombings, vandalism, intimidation, assaults, stalking, etc. No membership dues are necessary—the only way to become a “member” is to engage in “direct action”…criminal activity designed to cause economic loss or destroy the victim company’s operations.

 

So what are we doing to counter the threat? For one, we’ve mapped our environmental and animal rights extremism cases in order to give our investigators around the country and our executive management a big-picture look at what’s happening and where. We’re also analyzing information from financial records, phone records, and mail…and working to increase our human source reporting. And we’re sharing intelligence with our partners through our Joint Terrorism Task Forces and other investigative endeavors. Sharing info with our partners, particularly at the local level, is crucial because many times they’re the first ones at the crime scene.

 

We’re also taking advantage of the 2006 revision to the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act, which toughened penalties, created additional protections for people (the original law only covered property damage), and included secondary targets (often times companies that do business with primary targets are themselves targeted).

 

Our efforts have paid off—since 2005, our investigations have resulted in indictments against 30 individuals.

 

Of course, fully cognizant of the right to free speech, we investigate all animal rights and environmental extremism cases in strict accordance with the law and our guidelines.

 

So whatever happened to Eric McDavid? In May, he was sentenced to nearly 20 years in federal prison.

 

 

 

 

Domestic Terrorism

Anarchist Extremism: A Primer

 

 

Domestic Terrorism

Anarchist Extremism: A Primer

 

11/16/2010

 

Broken windowTo help educate the public about domestic terrorism—Americans attacking Americans because of U.S.-based extremist ideologies—we’ve previously outlined three separate threats: eco-terrorists/animal rights extremists, lone offenders, and the sovereign citizen movement.

 

Today, we look at a fourth threat—anarchist extremism.

 

What is anarchist extremism? Anarchism is a belief that society should have no government, laws, police, or any other authority. Having that belief is perfectly legal, and the majority of anarchists in the U.S. advocate change through non-violent, non-criminal means. A small minority, however, believes change can only be accomplished through violence and criminal acts…and that, of course, is against the law.

 

Anarchist extremism is nothing new to the FBI. One of our first big cases occurred in 1919, when the Bureau of Investigation (as we were called then) investigated a series of anarchist bombings in several U.S. cities. And during the 1970s, the FBI investigated anarchist extremists such as the Weather Underground Organization, which conducted a series of bombing campaigns.

 

The current threat. Anarchist extremism in the U.S. encompasses a variety of ideologies, including anti-capitalism, anti-globalism, and anti-urbanization. There’s also "green anarchy," an element of anarchist extremism mixed with environmental extremism. The extremists are loosely organized, with no central leadership—although they occasionally demonstrate limited ability to mobilize themselves.

 

Typically, anarchist extremists in the U.S. are event-driven—they show up at political conventions, economic and financial summits, environmental meetings, and the like. They usually target symbols of Western civilization that they perceive to be the root causes of all societal ills—i.e., financial corporations, government institutions, multinational companies, and law enforcement agencies. They damage and vandalize property, riot, set fires, and perpetrate small-scale bombings. Law enforcement is also concerned about anarchist extremists who may be willing to use improvised explosives devices or improvised incendiary devices.

 

Currently, much of the criminal activities of anarchist extremists fall under local jurisdiction, so they’re investigated by local police. If asked by police, the Bureau can assist. But we have a heavy presence at a major national or international events generating significant media coverage—that’s when the threat from anarchist extremists, as well as others who are up to no good, dramatically increases.

 

For today’s generation of American anarchist extremists, the rioting that disrupted the 1999 World Trade Organization meetings in Seattle is the standard by which they measure “success”—it resulted in millions of dollars in property damage and economic loss and injuries to hundreds of law enforcement officers and bystanders. But fortunately, they haven’t been able to duplicate what happened in Seattle…which may be a combination of the improved preparations of law enforcement as well as the disorganization of the movement.

 

This disorganization, though, can also be a challenge for law enforcement: it gives the extremists anonymity and low visibility, and it makes it tough to recruit sources and gather intelligence. It’s challenging, but not impossible—there have been a number of anarchist convictions since 1999 at both the state and federal levels. And the FBI, along with our law enforcement partners, will continue to detect and disrupt enterprises and individuals involved in criminal activity or who advocate the use of force or violence to further an anarchist extremist ideology.

11/16/2010

 

Broken windowTo help educate the public about domestic terrorism—Americans attacking Americans because of U.S.-based extremist ideologies—we’ve previously outlined three separate threats: eco-terrorists/animal rights extremists, lone offenders, and the sovereign citizen movement.

 

Today, we look at a fourth threat—anarchist extremism.

 

What is anarchist extremism? Anarchism is a belief that society should have no government, laws, police, or any other authority. Having that belief is perfectly legal, and the majority of anarchists in the U.S. advocate change through non-violent, non-criminal means. A small minority, however, believes change can only be accomplished through violence and criminal acts…and that, of course, is against the law.

 

Anarchist extremism is nothing new to the FBI. One of our first big cases occurred in 1919, when the Bureau of Investigation (as we were called then) investigated a series of anarchist bombings in several U.S. cities. And during the 1970s, the FBI investigated anarchist extremists such as the Weather Underground Organization, which conducted a series of bombing campaigns.

 

The current threat. Anarchist extremism in the U.S. encompasses a variety of ideologies, including anti-capitalism, anti-globalism, and anti-urbanization. There’s also "green anarchy," an element of anarchist extremism mixed with environmental extremism. The extremists are loosely organized, with no central leadership—although they occasionally demonstrate limited ability to mobilize themselves.

 

Typically, anarchist extremists in the U.S. are event-driven—they show up at political conventions, economic and financial summits, environmental meetings, and the like. They usually target symbols of Western civilization that they perceive to be the root causes of all societal ills—i.e., financial corporations, government institutions, multinational companies, and law enforcement agencies. They damage and vandalize property, riot, set fires, and perpetrate small-scale bombings. Law enforcement is also concerned about anarchist extremists who may be willing to use improvised explosives devices or improvised incendiary devices.

 

Currently, much of the criminal activities of anarchist extremists fall under local jurisdiction, so they’re investigated by local police. If asked by police, the Bureau can assist. But we have a heavy presence at a major national or international events generating significant media coverage—that’s when the threat from anarchist extremists, as well as others who are up to no good, dramatically increases.

 

For today’s generation of American anarchist extremists, the rioting that disrupted the 1999 World Trade Organization meetings in Seattle is the standard by which they measure “success”—it resulted in millions of dollars in property damage and economic loss and injuries to hundreds of law enforcement officers and bystanders. But fortunately, they haven’t been able to duplicate what happened in Seattle…which may be a combination of the improved preparations of law enforcement as well as the disorganization of the movement.

 

This disorganization, though, can also be a challenge for law enforcement: it gives the extremists anonymity and low visibility, and it makes it tough to recruit sources and gather intelligence. It’s challenging, but not impossible—there have been a number of anarchist convictions since 1999 at both the state and federal levels. And the FBI, along with our law enforcement partners, will continue to detect and disrupt enterprises and individuals involved in criminal activity or who advocate the use of force or violence to further an anarchist extremist ideology.

 

 

 

Here are a bunch of non-Arab US citizens that have been labelled as wanted terrorists (these are just the ones still on the run, there are many more like Tim McVeigh and Ted Kaczinski who are in prison or dead):

 

 

 

 

The USG has named MANY white/non-Arab, US citizens terrorists, here's just a few:

 

 

JOSEPH MAHMOUD DIBEE

Subject Image Subject Image

Photo taken in early 1990s

Multimedia: Images

Aliases:

Joe Dibee, "Seattle", "Steve", "God"

DESCRIPTION

Date(s) of Birth Used:

 

 

November 10, 1967

 

Place of Birth:Seattle, Washington

Height:6'3"

Weight:150 pounds

NCIC:W108732930

Occupation:Computer Software Tester

 

 

Hair: Black Eyes: Brown Sex: Male Race: White Nationality: American Scars and Marks:

 

 

None known

 

Remarks:

Dibee may have fled to Syria.

CAUTION

On January 19, 2006, a federal grand jury in Eugene, Oregon, indicted Joseph Mahmoud Dibee on multiple charges related to his alleged role in a domestic terrorism cell. Dibee was charged with two conspiracy violations related to seventeen incidents and one count of arson. These crimes occurred in Oregon, Washington, California, Colorado, and Wyoming, and date back to 1996. Many of the crimes he is accused of participating in were claimed to be committed by the Earth Liberation Front (ELF) or the Animal Liberation Front (ALF).

REWARD

The FBI is offering a reward of up to $50,000 for information leading to the arrest of Joseph Mahmoud Dibee.

SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ARMED AND DANGEROUS

 

If you have any information concerning this person, please contact your local FBI office or the nearest American Embassy or Consulate.

 

Field Office: Portland

 

 

 

 

 

JOANNE DEBORAH CHESIMARD

Subject Image Subject Image Subject Image

 

Multimedia: Images

Aliases:

Assata Shakur, Joanne Byron, Barbara Odoms, Joanne Chesterman, Joan Davis, Justine Henderson, Mary Davis, Pat Chesimard, Jo-Ann Chesimard, Joanne Debra Chesimard, Joanne D. Byron, Joanne D. Chesimard, Joanne Davis, Chesimard Joanne, Ches Chesimard, Sister-Love Chesimard, Joann Debra Byron Chesimard, Joanne Deborah Byron Chesimard, Joan Chesimard, Josephine Henderson, Carolyn Johnson, Carol Brown, "Ches"

DESCRIPTION

Date(s) of Birth Used:

 

 

July 16, 1947;

August 19, 1952

 

Place of Birth:New York City, New York

Height:5'7"

Weight:135 to 150 pounds

NCIC:W220305367Occupation:

 

 

Unknown

 

 

Hair: Black/Gray Eyes: Brown Sex: Female Race: Black Nationality: American Scars and Marks:

 

 

Chesimard has scars on her chest, abdomen, left shoulder, and left knee.

 

Remarks:

Chesimard may be living in Cuba. She may wear her hair in a variety of styles and dress in African tribal clothing.

CAUTION

 

Joanne Chesimard is wanted for escaping from prison in Clinton, New Jersey, while serving a life sentence for murder. On May 2, 1973, Chesimard, who was part of a revolutionary activist organization known as the Black Liberation Army, and two accomplices were stopped for a motor vehicle violation on the New Jersey Turnpike by two troopers with the New Jersey State Police. At the time, Chesimard was wanted for her involvement in several felonies, including bank robbery. Chesimard and her accomplices opened fire on the troopers, seemingly without provocation. One trooper was wounded and the other was shot and killed execution-style at point-blank range. Chesimard fled the scene, but was subsequently apprehended. One of her accomplices was killed in the shoot-out and the other was also apprehended and remains in jail.

 

In 1977, Chesimard was found guilty of first degree murder, assault and battery of a police officer, assault with a dangerous weapon, assault with intent to kill, illegal possession of a weapon, and armed robbery. She was sentenced to life in prison.

 

On November 2, 1979, Chesimard escaped from prison and lived underground before being located in Cuba in 1984. She is thought to currently still be living in Cuba.

REWARD

The FBI is offering a reward of up to $1,000,000 for information directly leading to the apprehension of Joanne Chesimard.

SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ARMED AND EXTREMELY DANGEROUS

 

If you have any information concerning this person, please contact your local FBI office or the nearest American Embassy or Consulate.

 

Field Office: Newark

 

 

 

REBECCA J. RUBIN

Subject Image

Photograph taken in 1998

Multimedia: Images

Aliases:

Rebecca Jenneatte Rubin, Rebecca Jeanette Rubin, "Little Missy", "Kara"

DESCRIPTION

Date(s) of Birth Used:

 

 

April 18, 1973

 

Place of Birth:Unknown(Believed to be Canada)

Height:5'5" to 5'8"

Weight:130 to 145 pounds

NCIC:W518733972

Occupation:

 

 

Activist, Wildlife Care

 

 

Hair: Brown Eyes: Hazel Sex: Female Race: White Nationality: Unknown (Believed to be Canadian)

Scars and Marks:

 

 

None known

 

Remarks:

Rubin may have returned to Canada in 2005. She may have light facial hair.

CAUTION

On January 19, 2006, a federal grand jury in Eugene, Oregon, indicted Rebecca J. Rubin on multiple charges related to her alleged role in a domestic terrorism cell. Rubin was charged with two conspiracy violations related to seventeen incidents and two counts of arson. These crimes occurred in Oregon and date back to 1997. Many of the crimes she is accused of participating in were claimed to be committed by the Earth Liberation Front (ELF) or the Animal Liberation Front (ALF).

REWARD

The FBI is offering a reward of up to $50,000 for information leading to the arrest of Rebecca J. Rubin.

SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ARMED AND DANGEROUS AND AN ESCAPE RISK

 

If you have any information concerning this person, please contact your local FBI office or the nearest American Embassy or Consulate.

 

Field Office: Portland

 

 

 

JOSEPHINE SUNSHINE OVERAKER

Subject Image Subject Image Subject Image

 

Multimedia: Images

Aliases:

Lisa Rachelle Quintana, Lisa R. Quintana, Maria Rachelle Quintana, Maria Quintana, "Osha", "Jo", "China", "Josie", "Mo"

DESCRIPTION

Date(s) of Birth Used:

 

 

November 19, 1974;

October 4, 1971;

November 4, 1971

 

Place of Birth:Canada

Height:5'3"

Weight:130 pounds

NCIC:W105842105

W258514859Occupation:

 

 

Overaker may seek employment as a firefighter, a midwife, a sheep tender, or a masseuse.

 

 

Hair: Brown Eyes: Brown Sex: Female Race: White Nationality: Canadian Scars and Marks:

 

 

Overaker has a large unknown tattoo on her upper left arm and a very large bird tattoo stretching from her right upper arm across her upper back (shown below). She has scars on her left ankle, right ankle, right calf, and right thigh.

 

Remarks:

Overaker is fluent in Spanish. She is known to use illegal narcotics. Overaker may have a light facial moustache. She was a vegan and may still be. Overaker is an American citizen.

CAUTION

On January 19, 2006, a federal grand jury in Eugene, Oregon, indicted Josephine Sunshine Overaker on multiple charges related to her alleged role in a domestic terrorism cell. Overaker was charged with two conspiracy violations related to seventeen incidents, five counts of arson, one count of attempted arson, and one count of destruction of an energy facility. These crimes occurred in Oregon, Washington, California, Colorado, and Wyoming, and date back to 1996. Many of the crimes she is accused of participating in were claimed to be committed by the Earth Liberation Front (ELF) or the Animal Liberation Front (ALF).

REWARD

The FBI is offering a reward of up to $50,000 for information leading to the arrest of Josephine Sunshine Overaker.

SHOULD BE CONSIDERED AN ESCAPE RISK

 

If you have any information concerning this person, please contact your local FBI office or the nearest American Embassy or Consulate.

 

Field Office: Portland

 

 

 

 

 

ELIZABETH ANNA DUKE

Subject Image Subject Image

Photograph taken in 1985

Multimedia: Images

Aliases:

Betty Ann Duke, Elizabeth Ann Duke, Betty Weir, "Betty Ann"

DESCRIPTION

Date(s) of Birth Used:

 

 

November 25, 1940;

April 20, 1941

 

Place of Birth: Beeville, Texas Height: 5'6" Weight: 120 pounds NCIC: W502404799 Occupation: Teacher, Philanthropist

 

 

Hair:Brown (May now be gray) Eyes: Blue Sex: Female Race: White Nationality: American Scars and Marks:

 

 

Duke has pin holes on the front of her earlobes due to a genetic condition.

 

Remarks:

Duke is known to speak fluent Spanish. She has ties to Texas and is known to travel in the northern United States near the Canadian border.

CAUTION

Elizabeth Anna Duke is wanted for her alleged involvement in a series of criminal activities during the late 1970's and early 1980's. She was allegedly a member of the radical group known as the May 19th Communist Organization which advocated communism and the violent overthrow of the United States Government. Duke was arrested in Bucks County, Pennsylvania, in May of 1985 for her alleged participation in this group, but was released on bail. She later fled the jurisdiction and has been a fugitive since October of 1985. A federal arrest warrant was issued for Duke in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on November 13, 1986, charging her with the aforementioned federal charges.

REWARD

The FBI is offering a reward of up to $50,000 for information leading directly to the arrest and conviction of Elizabeth Anna Duke.

SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ARMED AND DANGEROUS AND AN ESCAPE RISK

 

If you have any information concerning this person, please contact your local FBI office or the nearest American Embassy or Consulate.

 

Field Office: Philadelphia

 

 

 

 

 

Sabotage; Destruction of Government Property; Conspiracy

LEO FREDERICK BURT

Subject Image Subject Image Subject Image

Photograph taken in 1969 Photographic retouch Photographic retouch

Multimedia: Images

Alias:

Eugene Donald Fieldston

DESCRIPTION

Date(s) of Birth Used:

 

 

April 18, 1948;

April 15, 1950

 

Place of Birth: Darby, Pennsylvania Height: 5'11" to 6'0" Weight: 185 pounds NCIC:W735004020 Occupation:Laborer and watchman

 

 

Hair: Brown (may now be gray). Eyes:Hazel, Sex: Male, Race: White, Nationality: American, Scars and Marks:

 

 

None known

 

Remarks:

Burt may wear a moustache and beard and has worn his hair long in the back. He may also wear glasses. Burt has ties to New York City, New York; Boston, Massachusetts; and Peterborough, Ontario, Canada.

CAUTION

 

Leo Frederick Burt is wanted for allegedly participating in the bombing of Sterling Hall, on the campus of the University of Wisconsin, on August 24, 1970. The blast from the explosion, combined with the fire, resulted in the death of a 33-year-old researcher. Additionally, there were several injuries reported and an estimated $6 million damage to the building and its contents. Reportedly, explosives had been placed in a stolen panel truck, located three blocks from the building, just several days before the blast. Also, a light-colored, late-model vehicle (Corvair) was seen leaving the vicinity of the bombing, and Burt was identified as being in the car.

 

On September 2, 1970, Leo Burt was indicted federally in Madison, Wisconsin. He was charged with sabotage, destruction of government property, and conspiracy.

REWARD

The FBI is offering a $150,000 for information leading to the arrest of Leo Frederick Burt.

SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ARMED AND DANGEROUS

 

If you have any information concerning this person, please contact your local FBI office or the nearest American Embassy or Consulate.

 

Field Office: Milwaukee

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, PFFFFFT,

 

What I'm suggesting is that you before you form such concrete opinions on complex matters - and then call people out for believing something different - you should probably gain a better understanding of what you are talking about.

 

Unless that cat who shot the cinema up had political demands, we was not carrying out a terrorist attack. The information I have posted above indicates (and the fact that Timothy McVeigh and Ted Kaczinski are household names associated with terrorism) that the USG has no problem in identifying white, US citizens as terrorists and in fact has a long and clear history of doing so.

 

 

Read more, talk less.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So dude in a gas mask and a gun can't be bum rushed and tackled to the ground?

It's called fight or flight, if there's nowhere to run and you just cower and allow yourself and whoever you're there with to get shot along with everybody else in the movie theater, then you get what you deserve.

 

And it was a fucking smoke bomb not teargas, jackass.

 

Get the facts, bruh. He was posted near the exit and was taking people down as they were trying to flee the theatre, people reacting to their fight or flight instinct. I doubt in the confusion and chaos going on anybody had any time to coordinate a tackle effort against this guy.

 

The same argument can be hand for people who have conceal and carry permits, which are apparently aplenty in Colorado - why didn't anybody in the theatre have one on them?

 

And it was two cannisters of tear gas from all the accounts I've read. Tear gas/smoke bomb, same thing man. It makes your eyes sting and its hard to breathe, what difference would it ultimately make.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what possible conspiracy theories could be conceived about this situation? the guys was a fucking cornball, who went so far as to die his hair red and call himself the joker. who purposefully becomes a ginger?

 

this whole story needs to fuck off and people need to let the families do their mourning in private, I personally don't need any more coverage than what I got at 7am when I woke and caught the headlines on the am news. not where he acquired the guns from, who he talked to, whats inside his apartment, a reenactment of his moves that night. none of that information would enhance my life one bit.

 

fuck this guy to hell, should have turned one on himself like those columbine faggots

 

I've already seen one floated that has claimed he wasn't working alone. Also questioned a grad student on social assistances ability to afford upwards of $10,000 worth of guns/ammo/tactical equipment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

THIS IS WHAT IM Talking about...

 

 

The word "terrorism" is politically and emotionally charged,[3] and this greatly compounds the difficulty of providing a precise definition. Studies have found over 100 definitions of “terrorism”.[4][5] The concept of terrorism may itself be controversial as it is often used by state authorities (and individuals with access to state support) to delegitimize political or other opponents,[6] and potentially legitimize the state's own use of armed force against opponents (such use of force may itself be described as "terror" by opponents of the state).

 

 

OF COURSE THOSE PEOPLE MENTIONED ABOVE ARE WHITE TERRORIST.

i never said it has NEVER happened before..

 

“Oh he’s just a gunman…not a terrorist..” that is a fucked up way to think.

Terrorist is a word used to describe anyone that brings about terror to the people and this man, ladies and gentleman, was definitely a terrorist

 

Have terrorists been associated this much with a specific religion that even some people would go to such an extent to term the attacker a gunman and not a terrorist?

 

What this goes to show is just that bad, sick and cruel people are everywhere, can belong to any religion and can be of any skin color. These things are obviously not what define a terrorist, but rather, it is the thinking and actions of a person that do make the difference.

 

Fighting wars across the border just is not the answer to anything and with the recent chain of events involving fucked up killings in a country like the United States, world leaders should stop and think for a moment whether there nations are better off this way or not. Is spending of billions of dollars on wars in Afghanistan and Iraq along with planning out many more against nations like Iran and Pakistan really the answer?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pfffffffffft

 

I think you have some valid points, but I think perhaps your agenda regarding the discussion of foreign politics is not the most pertinent with regards to this current event.

 

This is an event that happened in the states, and the accused perpetrator appears to be an american citizen. I agree, completely that there are issues with fairness of reporting when it comes to crimes committed by "visible minorities" or people of certain geographical backgrounds.

 

I think perhaps that a larger issue at hand is the use of these instances by the media, lobbyists and government as a means to pursue or further strengthen elements of control within society.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

THIS IS WHAT IM Talking about...

 

 

The word "terrorism" is politically and emotionally charged,[3] and this greatly compounds the difficulty of providing a precise definition. Studies have found over 100 definitions of “terrorism”.[4][5] The concept of terrorism may itself be controversial as it is often used by state authorities (and individuals with access to state support) to delegitimize political or other opponents,[6] and potentially legitimize the state's own use of armed force against opponents (such use of force may itself be described as "terror" by opponents of the state).

 

Show me one definition that doesn't argue that it is the use of fear as a means to create a reaction of some one OTHER than the people being attacked. IF you cannot find that your theory of terrorism is inaccurate.

 

I can dig up more definitions of terrorism that come from academics from all persuasions than I can govt definitions. And again, they will all have one thing in common; the creation of fear to elicit and response from another party.

 

 

“Oh he’s just a gunman…not a terrorist..” that is a fucked up way to think.

Terrorist is a word used to describe anyone that brings about terror to the people and this man, ladies and gentleman, was definitely a terrorist

 

So Ted Bundy was a terrorist, the Hillside Strangler was a terrorist, the Virginia Tech Killer was a terrorist, the Colombine killers were terrorists, Wade Frankum and MArtin Bryant were terrorists?

 

No, they were serial killers and mass muderers. Their aim was to fulfill their own urges to kill, not to create fear. A terrorist's tactic is to create fear to pressure a change in policy, not simply to murder some one.

 

Have terrorists been associated this much with a specific religion that even some people would go to such an extent to term the attacker a gunman and not a terrorist?

 

I have no idea what you are talking about but have you ever heard of the IRA, FARC, ETA, The Shining Path, The Red Brigade, November 17, The Weathermen Underground, Narodnaya Volya, Animal Liberation Front, Deep Green Resistance, etc. etc.?

 

All terrorist groups, many still highly active. Only the IRA could be claimed to be related to religion but that's a long bow to draw for a few decades now. All the rest, not a thing to do with religion.

 

So fucked if I know what you're talking about, mate.

 

What this goes to show is just that bad, sick and cruel people are everywhere, can belong to any religion and can be of any skin color. These things are obviously not what define a terrorist, but rather, it is the thinking and actions of a person that do make the difference.

 

Fighting wars across the border just is not the answer to anything and with the recent chain of events involving fucked up killings in a country like the United States, world leaders should stop and think for a moment whether there nations are better off this way or not. Is spending of billions of dollars on wars in Afghanistan and Iraq along with planning out many more against nations like Iran and Pakistan really the answer?

 

 

Ok, now you've gone in to la la land here.

 

This guy geared up, went in to a cinema and killed/wounded a whole bunch of people. The reason people aren't reacting the same way as they would if it was an act of terrorism is because it's over. The dude got caught, so there is no fear of follow on attacks. It's sad, it's fucked up and wrong, but its not scary because there is no threat to us.

 

If it was a terror attack the message would be "there will be more attacks until you [insert demand here]". That means every time we go to a cinema, get on a train or go to the shops we have to wonder if we will be next. We would experience terror/fear and demand our govt does something about it so we don't have to fear being blown up.

 

The killer was caught. He was acting alone without demands, the danger has passed and thus a different reaction out of people. NOT that he's white and "one of us".

 

The reason why you can't see this is because you have a misconception of what terrorism actually is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I can dig up more definitions of terrorism that come from academics from all persuasions than I can govt definitions. And again, they will all have one thing in common; the creation of fear to elicit and response from another party.

 

 

 

 

 

 

You just answered you own question and proved my point.

 

thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But what response was he trying to elicit?

 

Again, I see your point that terrorists come in all shapes and sizes. I think everyone does. But simply because that's true doesn't make him a terrorist. A lunatic and a killer, sure, but unless it comes out that he was trying to raise awareness about gun control or something...I don't agree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Answered my own question? I didn't have a question!!??!!

 

Terrorism is creating fear among the population to force the govt to change policy. That's what it is and the way anyone that matters conceives it.

 

However, I get the idea no matter what is said you are set on your course regardless what anyone says.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

dude elicited terror, destruction and distributed death HENSE THE WORD TERROR IN TERRORist..

dude terrorized those poor people..

dude elicited a response from the media and law enforcement to tighten security at other batman premieres across the nation...raising the level of fear.

 

dude is a terrorist along with all those other names like crazy, psycho, nutjob..

a political terrorist?.. that is still undetermined

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...