12packprophet Posted March 20, 2012 Author Share Posted March 20, 2012 Sometimes it's not about arguing, it's just nice to be reminded how butt fucking uninformed he is. Carry on. As if I didn't make it clear from the gate that I'm very informed that somebody way back in time divided one continent into three. And that my entire point is that even though their intention was to divide the continent by race, they clearly failed by lumping India, Pakistan and Afghanistan into the same "continent" as Vietnam, Korea and Cambodia. And that the end result of that failure is people arguing over the internet that Indians and Pakistanis are somehow the same race as Laotians and Japanese just because their man-made "Continent" was drawn up hundreds of years ago most likely by some fuck-witted European explorer who knew just as much about the land and it's people as John Glenn knew about the Moon. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_thinking Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
12packprophet Posted March 20, 2012 Author Share Posted March 20, 2012 PS: These are dogs. You can tell by the hooves. It's clearly not a fish though, is it? Which was you and others original claim as to why is was so fucking ridiculous that whales evolved from dog like animals. A dog with hooves is still a dog with hooves. And real talk, those "hooves" look a lot more similar to a dogs paws than they do a horses hooves. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
12packprophet Posted March 20, 2012 Author Share Posted March 20, 2012 This is where you are wrong though. Yes the line drawn on a map is man made but many of the borders on the ground/in real life are largely natural and based on physical barriers such mountain ranges, rivers and coastlines. All of which we have right here in the U.S of A. So is everything west of the Rockies a different continent than the mid west? What about everything east of the Mississippi? Is the U.S. now three different continents just because of mountains and rivers? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
injury Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 why do you people do this ... why Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
12packprophet Posted March 20, 2012 Author Share Posted March 20, 2012 And that brings up another point, if you're going to include Europe in this you have to say Eurasia otherwise you're off target for reasons that can be explained if anyone gives enough of a fuck. PS, you forbid your wife from doing things? That's rather 1950s of you. Eurasia is still a part of the original one continent that got divided up into three. So yes, I include that. And my wife knows she sucks at driving. And that the reason why she's forbidden from driving on the highways is because she'll fucking kill herself/and my kids. It's what it is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
penmanship Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 Your lack of geopolitics and common sense always make me laugh I don't think I saw the origins of the dog whale debate but have always wondered your description and now will laugh every time I see the reference that much more. POST THE COMICS MOOGLE. I'll give you props and you'll feel happy about them Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
12packprophet Posted March 20, 2012 Author Share Posted March 20, 2012 Your lack of geopolitics and common sense always make me laugh I don't think I saw the origins of the dog whale debate but have always wondered your description and now will laugh every time I see the reference that much more. POST THE COMICS MOOGLE. I'll give you props and you'll feel happy about them Then you're a fucking retard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
penmanship Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 Solid rebuttal. your logic is infallible. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
12packprophet Posted March 20, 2012 Author Share Posted March 20, 2012 Solid rebuttal. your logic is infallible. Says the brainiac who's dying in laughter at this not being either a fish or a horse: So which is it? A fish or a horse? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
12packprophet Posted March 20, 2012 Author Share Posted March 20, 2012 Seriously... know the argument that you're jumping into. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vanfullofretards Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 DAO, it's a whale. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
penmanship Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MOOGLE? Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 Three men make a tiger[/url] .... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inappropriate_Responder Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
12packprophet Posted March 20, 2012 Author Share Posted March 20, 2012 And you're the fucking Einstein talking about infallible logic and laughter and such. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
penmanship Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 hahaha. Awesome. MOOGLE Where they at? or you uploading in the day some time? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walid Jumblat Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 All of which we have right here in the U.S of A. So is everything west of the Rockies a different continent than the mid west? What about everything east of the Mississippi? Is the U.S. now three different continents just because of mountains and rivers? Yes, the borders in the US were drawn by Europeans, just as I said much of Africa and the Mid East was. I don't get your point. Now, before you go equating me in to the general argument here make sure that that you pay attention to what I'm saying, rather than what I'm not saying. I'm simply addressing your claim that borders are a man made reality and saying that this is not the case. Much of the time the borders reflect natural realities rather than man made wishes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MOOGLE? Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 The Moving Goalpost A method of denial arbitrarily moving the criteria for “proof” or acceptance out of range of whatever evidence currently exists. If new evidence comes to light meeting the prior criteria, the goalpost is pushed back further – keeping it out of range of the new evidence. Sometimes impossible criteria are set up at the start – moving the goalpost impossibly out of range -for the purpose of denying an undesirable conclusion. ...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
12packprophet Posted March 20, 2012 Author Share Posted March 20, 2012 Yes, the borders in the US were drawn by Europeans, just as I said much of Africa and the Mid East was. I don't get your point. Now, before you go equating me in to the general argument here make sure that that you pay attention to what I'm saying, rather than what I'm not saying. I'm simply addressing your claim that borders are a man made reality and saying that this is not the case. Much of the time the borders reflect natural realities rather than man made wishes. I am paying attention to what you're saying. You're saying that Eurasiamiddleastistan is three different continents because of mountains and rivers and such. And that it has nothing at all to do with race. Hence Indians and Pakistanis somehow being the same race as Chinese and Vietnamese people. You know, because they're technically in the same part of the continent that was divided up into three continents way back when. Even though North America also has mountains and Rivers and such, yet isn't divided into three or more different continents. I mean, that is exactly what you're saying while claiming it's not what you're saying. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newer Bigger Better Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 Dog Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newer Bigger Better Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 Dog. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MOOGLE? Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 Phenotype :jpotato: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newer Bigger Better Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 Dog. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
12packprophet Posted March 20, 2012 Author Share Posted March 20, 2012 ...... Meanwhile I'm the only one who hasn't moved my goalpost in this entire years long argument. Keep trying though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CONCRETE RIVER Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 Finally some action In chO 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walid Jumblat Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 I am paying attention to what you're saying. You're saying that Eurasiamiddleastistan is three different continents because of mountains and rivers and such. And that it has nothing at all to do with race. Where the fuck did I say that???! Hence Indians and Pakistanis somehow being the same race as Chinese and Vietnamese people. You know, because they're technically in the same part of the continent that was divided up into three continents way back when. Even though North America also has mountains and Rivers and such, yet isn't divided into three or more different continents. I mean, that is exactly what you're saying while claiming it's not what you're saying. If you're not drunk and/or momentarily confusing me with another poster in this thread you need to get your head read. I have not said any of the above and if you think I have it would be awesome if you could show me where. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MOOGLE? Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 Post-hoc ergo propter hoc This fallacy follows the basic format of: A preceded B, therefore A caused B, and therefore assumes cause and effect for two events just because they are temporally related (the latin translates to "after this, therefore because of this"). ..... ..... ............ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CONCRETE RIVER Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 India=Asia=Cops Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
12packprophet Posted March 20, 2012 Author Share Posted March 20, 2012 Where the fuck did I say that???! :rolleyes: This is where you are wrong though. Yes the line drawn on a map is man made but many of the borders on the ground/in real life are largely natural and based on physical barriers such mountain ranges, rivers and coastlines. If you look at somewhere like the middle east and Africa where Europeans decided where the borders where for political reasons you see straight lines that cut through different tribes and whoever else. But when you look at Europe and Asia, a large amount of the borders are based on natural features. And that brings up another point, if you're going to include Europe in this you have to say Eurasia otherwise you're off target for reasons that can be explained if anyone gives enough of a fuck. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newer Bigger Better Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 Who was the idiot who decided to call all these people "Brazilians"?!?!?!? THEY LOOK DIFFERENT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.