!@#$% Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 A new, simple approach to 'adding' objects to photos could mark a new era for doctored photographs - letting amateurs add any object to photos without special equipment, training, or access to anything bar one original still. The technique, invented by programmer Kevin Karsch, will be shown off at the Siggraph conference in Hong Kong this month. Karsch says that even 'novice' users can achieve 'professional results'. cooler examples in the video http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2072075/New-super-Photoshop-lets-fakers-add-photos-minutes--tell-difference.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cool_Hand Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LUGR Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 Is this kinda like Photoshop? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CityonSMASH Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 good thread: heres one iv been working on with Karsch"s methods 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LUGR Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 ^ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CityonSMASH Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 Is this kinda like Photoshop? no, more like sorcery. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LUGR Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 calm down COS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inappropriate_Responder Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
!@#$% Posted February 1, 2012 Author Share Posted February 1, 2012 meh, the video has some cool shit it in that maybe you could do in photoshop, but i seriously fucking doubt it would look that good. you can often spot a photoshop, these were tested on an audience and the alterations were undetectable Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LUGR Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 Yeah, but I'm sure the "test" comparisons where purposely bad p.chops. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
!@#$% Posted February 1, 2012 Author Share Posted February 1, 2012 um, not exactly. they were asking an audience to say whether or not a picture was real or not they only used pics produced using their technique, they didn't compare the shit to a bunch of wack photoshop Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
!@#$% Posted February 1, 2012 Author Share Posted February 1, 2012 it would be more fun if people could read but i don't set the bar that high. .... We demonstrate in a user study that synthetic images produced by our method are confusable with real scenes, even for people who believe they are good at telling the difference. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CityonSMASH Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 but could you compare, an audiences abilitity to "say" weather or not a picture is real to a machines? no, what would make this interesting is if a pic info extracter program could be duped into generating the pic was unaltered. im not seeing the intrest or credability with a human audience. given the appropriate ammounts of time any photoshop hack could assemble a "flawless" pic that an "audience" would think is real. grain by grain. pixel by pixel. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LUGR Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 but i don't set the bar that high. Too COMPLEX! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cool_Hand Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 this thread needs more photoshop photos obv Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigdoughnut69 Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 I can't figure out how magnets work. Then the complex media bar happened, now I'm supposed to spot edited/unedited photos?!?!? Bar set waaaaaay too high. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cool_Hand Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fist 666 Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 this is cool. i don't care about tricking folks, but its going to be hugely useful in fields like construction, remodelling, landscaping, interior design, etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LUGR Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 ^Don't forgot how useful it is going to be for making seamless DAO faces jpegs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fist 666 Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 or 9/11 was an inside job photos. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bed framed Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 is there already a "this looks shopped thread?" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fat ralphy Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 So this is a porn thread now? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LUGR Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 ^Yeah, post porn in symbols thread. See what happens. *disclaimer: This is clearly not porn, just a woman and her alligator. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fist 666 Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 is this shopped? the shadows on the couch look wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LUGR Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 ^the link for the image look wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fist 666 Posted February 2, 2012 Share Posted February 2, 2012 does it not show up for you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LUGR Posted February 2, 2012 Share Posted February 2, 2012 Yeah, it doesn't show up. But after examining the IMG code, I highly suggest you fix that shit ASAP. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrChupacabra Posted February 2, 2012 Share Posted February 2, 2012 genkinopron.jpg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xoXox Posted February 2, 2012 Share Posted February 2, 2012 simpsons did it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
corporaljigsorequandry Posted February 2, 2012 Share Posted February 2, 2012 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.