Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...
Sign in to follow this  
!@#$%

Pics, and it may or may not have happened

Recommended Posts

 

 

A new, simple approach to 'adding' objects to photos could mark a new era for doctored photographs - letting amateurs add any object to photos without special equipment, training, or access to anything bar one original still.

The technique, invented by programmer Kevin Karsch, will be shown off at the Siggraph conference in Hong Kong this month. Karsch says that even 'novice' users can achieve 'professional results'.

 

article-2072075-0F1DD6CD00000578-85_634x228.jpg

 

cooler examples in the video

 

 

 

 

 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2072075/New-super-Photoshop-lets-fakers-add-photos-minutes--tell-difference.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this kinda like Photoshop?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1230403012448.JPEG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

meh, the video has some cool shit it in

that maybe you could do in photoshop, but i seriously fucking doubt it would look that good.

 

you can often spot a photoshop, these were tested on an audience and the alterations were undetectable

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, but I'm sure the "test" comparisons where purposely bad p.chops.

ga1a.jpg

l.jpg

sausage_fingers.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

um, not exactly.

 

they were asking an audience to say whether or not a picture was real or not

they only used pics produced using their technique, they didn't compare the shit to a bunch of wack photoshop

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

it would be more fun if people could read but i don't set the bar that high.

 

 

....

 

 

We demonstrate in a user study that synthetic images produced by our method are confusable with real scenes, even for people who believe they are good at telling the difference.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

but could you compare, an audiences abilitity to "say" weather or not a picture is real to a machines?

 

no, what would make this interesting is if a pic info extracter program could be duped into generating the pic was unaltered.

 

im not seeing the intrest or credability with a human audience.

 

given the appropriate ammounts of time any photoshop hack could assemble a "flawless" pic that an "audience" would think is real. grain by grain. pixel by pixel.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't figure out how magnets work. Then the complex media bar happened, now I'm supposed to spot

 

edited/unedited photos?!?!?

 

Bar set waaaaaay too high.

 

fallk.jpg

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

this is cool.

i don't care about tricking folks, but its going to be hugely useful in fields like construction, remodelling, landscaping, interior design, etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^Don't forgot how useful it is going to be for making seamless DAO faces jpegs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^Yeah, post porn in symbols thread.

 

See what happens.

tumblr_lmyj744yt51qbal5ko1_500.gif

*disclaimer: This is clearly not porn, just a woman and her alligator.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Register for a 12ozProphet forum account or sign in to comment

You need to be a forum member in order to comment. Forum accounts are separate from shop accounts.

Create an account

Register to become a 12ozProphet forum member.

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×