Realism Posted October 30, 2010 Share Posted October 30, 2010 Hopefully Kuma and Hert go over that shit for them blacking out throws that weren't even remotely in their way. Dude---they were totally in the way--- in the way of community beautification Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KnifeHits RS Posted October 30, 2010 Share Posted October 30, 2010 I know Seen.. Someone pm me so I can prove it. We're like best friends. He wrote in my blackbook. No really, I can prove it. Pm me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mercer Posted October 30, 2010 Share Posted October 30, 2010 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
earl broclo ESQ Posted October 30, 2010 Share Posted October 30, 2010 Was that Joan of Arc legal? I know the Gandhi one is on a busy street corner, so that's definitely legal. If the Joan of Arc wall is illegal then I can respect what they did there. If it's legal, than I'm calling bullshit on it. They didn't have to go over what was there, and they definitely didn't have to buff above them. There are plenty of walls they could approach for legal space, that need it more than that wall did. And they aren't really preserving graffiti history by going over solid work. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
COSMOGRAMMA Posted October 30, 2010 Share Posted October 30, 2010 YO I CALLED UP HERT AND THAT FOOLS DOWN TO DISS THAT SHIT -KUMA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MedicineCabinet Posted October 30, 2010 Share Posted October 30, 2010 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
COSMOGRAMMA Posted October 30, 2010 Share Posted October 30, 2010 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fat ralphy Posted October 30, 2010 Share Posted October 30, 2010 gay, to pay homage they should have just redone the exact works. hell they should have had seen do his own. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mercer Posted October 30, 2010 Share Posted October 30, 2010 Or they could come up with their own shit instead of half steppin on this "paying homage". The only thing worse than biting is people who miss the point and bite wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freakeenyc Posted October 30, 2010 Share Posted October 30, 2010 i dont know why they call themselves Slavery i personally dont think its a bad thing...this project i mean. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mercer Posted October 30, 2010 Share Posted October 30, 2010 I think it would be OK if they did this history shit without generating hype by using subway art classics. I've got no hate for artists trying to "beautify" communities at all, in fact I think it's good. The way they're doing it though is kinda like when some company uses a non writer to design a graffiti influenced graphic. It gets the people who don't know a little stoked like young toys or something but alienates 99% of the people in the know. Especially when they're associated with dissing solid graffiti by solid writers like that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tails0nE Posted October 30, 2010 Share Posted October 30, 2010 totally. if i was them id take it as a diss. where the fuck did the pull joan of arc from? shit is lame if they are changing the original pieces. thats not paying homage, thats bastardizing classics hit the nail on the head with this one... that shit is fuckin weak.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.