Jump to content

electronic voting and the future of america


iloveboxcars

Recommended Posts

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qV6qAGigGYY

 

I'd seriously appreciate it if everyone contacted their local newspapers/stations and anyone else that has any sort of voice in your community be it through the internet or dudes that just know a lot of people, show them this and ask them to spread the word.

 

 

 

DO NOT TURN THIS INTO A DEBATE ABOUT THE CANDIDATES. FUCK YOUR CANDIDATE. THIS IS ABOUT BULLSHIT ELECTRONIC VOTING AND DISCUSSION INVOLVING VOTING IN GENERAL.

 

 

 

ONCE AGAIN, FUCK YOUR CANDIDATE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This forum is supported by the 12ozProphet Shop, so go buy a shirt and help support!
This forum is brought to you by the 12ozProphet Shop.
This forum is brought to you by the 12oz Shop.

you could have most of the people voting for you, but when they use a system that is against you they dont stand a chance at getting you elected.

 

this is pure tyranny.

FALSE CHOICE

 

like choosing to drink a diarrhea slurpee or eat a dry caca sammich.

 

 

 

i see the nwo like a bully, the patriots at his face trying to make them flinch while the nwo saying, yeah i thought so nigga.

 

it is time we start sucker punching these fags

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Elections.

 

The reports were especially disturbing in Ohio, the critical battleground state that clinched Bush's victory in the electoral college. Officials there purged tens of thousands of eligible voters from the rolls, neglected to process registration cards generated by Democratic voter drives, shortchanged Democratic precincts when they allocated voting machines and illegally derailed a recount that could have given Kerry the presidency. A precinct in an evangelical church in Miami County recorded an impossibly high turnout of ninety-eight percent, while a polling place in inner-city Cleveland recorded an equally impossible turnout of only seven percent. In Warren County, GOP election officials even invented a nonexistent terrorist threat to bar the media from monitoring the official vote count.(11)

 

MUCH MORE: http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/10432334/was_the_2004_election_stolen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you could have most of the people voting for you, but when they use a system that is against you they dont stand a chance at getting you elected.

 

this is pure tyranny.

FALSE CHOICE

 

like choosing to drink a diarrhea slurpee or eat a dry caca sammich.

 

 

 

i see the nwo like a bully, the patriots at his face trying to make them flinch while the nwo saying, yeah i thought so nigga.

 

it is time we start sucker punching these fags

 

 

fuk this post is awsome.

 

this system needs to happen.

 

'GIVEN THAT THERE IS NO perfect voting system, is there at least an optimal one? Critics of touch-screen machines say that the best choice is “optical scan” technology. With this system, the voter pencils in her vote on a paper ballot, filling in bubbles to indicate which candidates she prefers. The vote is immediately tangible to the voters; they see it with their own eyes, because they personally record it. The tallying is done rapidly, because the ballots are fed into a computerized scanner. And if there’s a recount, the elections officials can simply take out the paper ballots and do it by hand.'

 

if they are going to rig every election why dont they get rid of the bullshit and just say 'BEND OVER BITCHS WE OWN YOU ALL'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right-winged.

 

The concept of individual rights had many flaws according to Folletts political philosophy not least of which was the fact that they believed that people were to stupid to make an informed decision. This led to the realization that any system of government allowing an individual to participate in the decision making process by having the right to vote, could not but help being flawed itself. Follett referred to this as "la force stupide de nombre"56 So vehement was she against the concept of an individual having the right to vote that in her introduction to The New State she proclaimed that, "Ballot-box democracy is what this book is written to oppose."

 

http://sovereignty.freedom.org/p/gov/hillmann-book2.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seriously all of these machines need to be removed. From what I know you can basically program these machines to show any result you would like, you can make the races as close or as wide as you need and without a open source to check the data there is basically no hard tally of the ballots.

 

We need to go back to paper ballots obviously there are ways to commit voters fraud with paper as well, but at least you can go back and go through the paper votes to get a hard count and filter out the fraudulent ballots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...