Jump to content

Obama and Huckabee win Iowa caucuses


Poop Man Bob

Recommended Posts

This forum is supported by the 12ozProphet Shop, so go buy a shirt and help support!
This forum is brought to you by the 12ozProphet Shop.
This forum is brought to you by the 12oz Shop.
  • Replies 276
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

At the Ron Paul rally, Des Moines police had to escort out of the downtown Marriott a man who began addressing the crowd about fraud and Republican vote counting.

 

I look up at this screen and it upsets me, said the man. As he was being taken out he identified himself as a private investigator named Clarence Malcolm.

 

I'm telling you, it is corrupt, he said.

 

Police said they did not arrest Malcolm, but said he would not be allowed to return to the event.

-Des Moines Register

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest shai_hulud

I'm pleasantly surprised to see that Ron Paul did considerably better than Mr. "Star-Power" Giuliani. I think this might be a sign that people are starting to look beyond the superficial qualities of the candidates and see where they stand on the issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest shai_hulud

I'll try to explain this in less than five paragraphs.

 

We're in the primary phase of the elections. Think of it as the regular season. There's fifty states...some of the states are swing states, which means that the vote can swing either way because the voters are equally spit between the Democrats and the Republicans. Then there's the spectator states, which solidly vote for one party. Campaigning in those states is not as aggressive on a party level, because that's in the bag. But, at the candidate level, it's competitive, because each wants to get as many votes as possible in states their party traditionally carries.

 

You know what? You can research this through if you want, because I'm positive there's a much better explanation out there than the one I can provide...that, and I don't think I can break this down that quickly. Which is a nice way of saying that I don't feel like typing all this out.

 

Suffice it to say, yes, it's confusing, and certain aspects of the American electoral process don't make much sense at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This election is going to one of, if not the most important one there has been in a loooong time..And if the Iowa numbers reflect anything, it may be about Religion vs. Common Sense. Frightening.

 

Iowa numbers do not reflect much of anything most of the time. Usually the people who win Iowa do not go on to win the nomination. (McCain in 2000, Dean in 2004 the guy who beat Clinton in 92, Pat Buchanan and so on.) Not to say that if you win Iowa you lose. It's just that only 20% of the Iowa population participate in the caucus and do not really represent the mindset of the country at large. Also the odd way that they carry on the votes, public votes, ability to change votes, leads to a lot of trading and deals being made. Thats why you see so few votes for lower tier candidates, because the voters usually get persuaded to cast their vote for a more popular candidate.

 

We will really see how things will end up in New Hampshire.

 

I predict Ron Paul pulling in at least 20% in NH and other states.

 

I'm not going to delude myself and say he is going to win it....Which would be fucking awesome if he did.

 

 

What really puzzles me though is the number of votes Thompson got. Talk about a useless candidate, what the fuck does he stand for? All I hear about him on the news is about how people say how lazy he is. Being on TV and the movies can only take you so far....oh wait....nevermind

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest shai_hulud

Clinton would be better off campaigning as a progressive Republican. Talk about a slap in the face to old Bill...:lol:

 

I like Edwards for the same reason I like Ron Paul. They both seem like they are fairly principled and they believe in what they say.

 

However, I would not vote for Ron Paul at this point in history simply because I don't think the US is ready to take the kind of personal responsibility he advocates. We're just not that evolved yet. Some of us are. But a lot more aren't.

 

However, if it came down to a Clinton/Paul ticket, I'd roll the dice with Paul. I have a feeling that's not gonna happen, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And I would agree with you completely, grim, except for the fact that Iowa is over 95% white, and

caucus numbers were nearly doubled for this primary in that state..To me, it shows a serious

shift in the level of apathy people have for the leadership of this country..just my two cents.

 

Fair enough, I was only able to follow the news tonight in very short intervals because I was at work. From the sound of it and forgive me if im not completely following this (slightly drunk) double the number of white mid-westerners showed up to vote, thats not really going to change the make-up of the end result.

 

Considering that fact that most Iowans are in a sense mid-western farmers or whatever just goes to prove the fact that you cant really predict much for the rest of the country. We all know how Iowa and the rest of the "heartland" will go in the general election anyways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...