angelofdeath Posted February 5, 2012 Share Posted February 5, 2012 they are private companies, it was better when they were nationalised. And you think that if these companies were allowed to do whatever they wanted they wouldnt monoplise the market further? that is just naive yes, privately owned but given privileges they dont have in a free market by the state. how is this a free market? the government uses its power to give them privileges. this the very basis of moussilini style fascism/corporatism. they are only allowed to 'monopolized' the market because THE GOD DAMNED GOVERNMENT USED THEIR POWER TO DO IT. THEY GAVE THE COMPANIES THE LEGAL ABILITY TO HOLD A MONOPOLY. do you see a difference? government says there can only be 1 power company, any other people offering these services go to jail. you are saying this is a market situation. yet it is totally legal for walmart to seek a monopoly by opening up as many stores as they can and 'running the others out of business.' they havent been able to do this. all the targets and other stores are in competition with them. and you think your government schooling education is beneficial? you cant even understand the difference between a government sanctioned monopoly and a free market. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.