shitting Posted July 21, 2006 Share Posted July 21, 2006 do they ever actually do anything or do they just call for ignored immediate ceasefires every other day? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pfffffffffft Posted July 21, 2006 Share Posted July 21, 2006 fuck.. in 2006, the UN is worthless.. really, i think the UN is a thing of the past..the get no love or respect from anyone in the world. Bush proved this when he said fuck the UN.. im going to iraq. FUCK YOUR COUCH! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lord_casek Posted July 21, 2006 Share Posted July 21, 2006 the u.n made israel a home for the jews. of course, the u.n went by another name back then. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angelofdeath Posted July 21, 2006 Share Posted July 21, 2006 yeah.. fuck the UN. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
---> Posted July 22, 2006 Share Posted July 22, 2006 I sort of wish the UN would dissarm the Bush regime and establish Democracy in America. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
russell jones Posted July 22, 2006 Share Posted July 22, 2006 I sort of wish the UN would dissarm the Bush regime and establish Democracy in America. They don't need to disarm 'em, just take away the political contributions. No free golf game and lobster, fuck it, I'm out! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fermentor666 Posted July 23, 2006 Share Posted July 23, 2006 It's not the UN that is useless, it is the countries that are useless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Obvious Posted July 23, 2006 Share Posted July 23, 2006 fuck.. in 2006, the UN is worthless.. really, i think the UN is a thing of the past..the get no love or respect from anyone in the world. Bush proved this when he said fuck the UN.. im going to iraq. FUCK YOUR COUCH! yeah exactly, i think the UN had been pretty good until 2003 when the UN Security Council vetoed the U.S.'s resolution for war and Bush said fuck it and invaded anyways. Which kinda made it look pointless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shitting Posted July 24, 2006 Author Share Posted July 24, 2006 I was only being serious to a degree Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WORDISM45 Posted July 24, 2006 Share Posted July 24, 2006 no UN resolutions are binding until countries ratify them in their own legislation. so the UN is a good tool for adressing issues and getting dialogue going but useless in terms of making anything legally binding Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fermentor666 Posted July 24, 2006 Share Posted July 24, 2006 Exactly. And the UN Peacekeeping forces are a fucking joke. Just look at the blind eyes they turned in Bosnia. Thank god Clinton sent in those fucking bombs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angelofdeath Posted July 24, 2006 Share Posted July 24, 2006 " Thank god Clinton sent in those fucking bombs." hahahahahahaha coming from someone who was just railing against the military industrial complex in another thread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fermentor666 Posted July 24, 2006 Share Posted July 24, 2006 Yeah, it must be surprising since you put people into generalized catagories from their first sentance. I must be a Republican war-monger now, by your logic. And yes, I read that, but you're still blocked. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angelofdeath Posted July 24, 2006 Share Posted July 24, 2006 that ignore button just isnt working to good eh? i love you man Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CALIgula Posted September 6, 2006 Share Posted September 6, 2006 anybody see kofi anon and ahmadinejad? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Obvious Posted September 7, 2006 Share Posted September 7, 2006 do they ever actually do anything or do they just call for ignored immediate ceasefires every other day? The United Nations and nations like France are always pussyfooting around and negotiating with terrorists. The U.S. so far is the hardest on terrorists in this "Global War on Terror" (as more than 90 nations are participating, not just the U.S.)... most Europeans are self-centered, and the reason why they're not as hardline on terrorism is because they haven't had a 9/11 happen to them to "wake the sleeping giant" that is the European Union. Prior to 9/11, the U.S. only saw terrorism as a criminal act that only required law enforcement measures and the regular U.S. court to prosecute the terrorists. Following 9/11, the U.S. saw terrorism as acts of war, and like acts of war, required both military and CIA action coupled with law enforcement action. Many European nations still seem to think terrorism just requires arrests and that will solve the problem. I'm not a fan of the war in Iraq, and was against it from the moment Bush decided to invade -- but still, I can still see where he's coming from on a broader scale, about not only neutralizing terrorists, but neutralizing their idealogy as well. And, according to Bush, spreading democracy and hoping for a "domino effect" at the "heartland" of Islamic terrorism itself is the way to do it. I'm not going to agree, but I can't say I disagree either. The only way is to watch as it unfolds. It will more than likely take decades before we start seeing results. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Obvious Posted September 7, 2006 Share Posted September 7, 2006 I didn't even know they had U.N. outposts in southern Lebanon until that recent Hezbollah-Israel altercation. I find out they were there since the Lebanese Civil War in the 1980's. Yet Hezbollah, which is branded a terrorist organization by many nations, were able to set up shop and gain control of southern Lebanon and eventually build their armament from Iran and Syria and then fire missles into Israeli cities... all while U.N. troops sat and let it happen. Talk about ineffective. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WORDISM45 Posted September 7, 2006 Share Posted September 7, 2006 yeah invading middle eastern countries and lettign them spiral into civil war while terrorizing the population is definitely attacking terrorism at the source and will result in a generation of peace loving arabs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fermentor666 Posted September 7, 2006 Share Posted September 7, 2006 Making love with napalm. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Obvious Posted September 7, 2006 Share Posted September 7, 2006 yeah invading middle eastern countries and lettign them spiral into civil war while terrorizing the population is definitely attacking terrorism at the source and will result in a generation of peace loving arabs The majority of the deaths in Iraq are at the hands of Iraqi and foreign Islamists, not the U.S. military. These daily suicide bombings and mortar attacks on schools and roving bands of masked death squads carrying out killings are Islamic terrorists, not U.S. troops. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shai Posted September 8, 2006 Share Posted September 8, 2006 Yet, there's no fault on the behalf of the US? Invasion and imposition of martial law is an excellent method of destabilizing an already oppressed region, history has shown. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WORDISM45 Posted September 10, 2006 Share Posted September 10, 2006 ezacery Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.