ILOTSMYBRAIN Posted March 7, 2011 Share Posted March 7, 2011 Nodice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lord_casek Posted March 7, 2011 Author Share Posted March 7, 2011 Nodice. Yeah, I don't think it's going to happen. We're all going to be stuck in this same thread for a long time to come arguing about calling each other names, Sheen, Jones, Avery, etc. Have an old friend who knows Dylan. From what I gather, she knows him pretty well. Just sent her a message and asked her to ask Dylan if he'd be willing to do an IAmA on reddit. If he agrees, I'll let you guys know about a link. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ILOTSMYBRAIN Posted March 7, 2011 Share Posted March 7, 2011 Well, I actually just edited a post that I made that was in response to what Silba said, sometimes after posting something I realize that it really isn't worth the time and effort, so I just edited it to say Nodice, because I can't actually delete the post. I do agree with what you have to say though, and word. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lord_casek Posted March 7, 2011 Author Share Posted March 7, 2011 Yep. Sometimes I'll come in here and read something that makes me want to write an epic novel as a reply only to think about it for a minute and decide that it would be next to pointless to do so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zig Posted March 7, 2011 Share Posted March 7, 2011 there's got to be something wrong with sheen for him to be doing those interviews, no doubt about it. he isn't 100% there, but at the same time i respect that man's attitude towards the american media... basically giving them the middle finger, and in ways he did WIN against them by doing what he did. i also don't know if i agree that he's manic depressive/bi-polar etc. i think he was just a little nutty from coming off the drugs cold turkey the way he did. it made for some great entertainment though, and i still don't think less of the man for doing it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silba Posted March 7, 2011 Share Posted March 7, 2011 Nobody's saying he's less of a MAN. Just that he's not credible enough to be commenting on anything other than "Cocaine is a hell of a drug, man" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zig Posted March 7, 2011 Share Posted March 7, 2011 he can comment on anything he wants to comment on... why do you have to be qualified to make a comment on something that everyone collectively experienced? if you don't want to take his comments seriously because he does drugs, then don't. that's your prerogative and no one can really say anything to you about it. it would make sense to a lot of people i'm sure if you said "listen, i don't agree with anything this man says because he is a crack head." sure.. completely legitimate. but, what i don't understand is at the same time you pay so much more attention to someone like Charlie Sheen instead of paying attention to actual scholars, physicists, authors, and real credible people who have gone public and lost their careers due to it. then you lump in the nonsense and bullshit with your reasoning as to why you disbelieve, and you dismiss all the material that is worth mentioning. just like you throw in ufo's, holograms, reptilians, and illuminati theories into every alternative 9/11 theory, you throw in Charlie Sheen's, Dylan Avery's, Alex Jones', and whatever else you can find that is unattractive into these debates as well to discredit it. you don't want to actually bring to the table any real scholarly material because it makes the actual debate look credible, so you pick and choose whatever whackyness is associated with the "movement" and you label people, mock them, troll them, laugh at them, and lump them all together in one category. it makes it easier for you to dismiss the entire thing and feel comfortable that you are right and they are wrong, that none of this can be possible because their just crazy nutjob drug addicted fools. but let's get real here for a second. i've heard and met plenty of drug addicts in my day speak about life, and a lot of the times these people have very REAL shit to say. i thought Charlie Sheen was being very REAL in those interviews, and i could give a fuck less if he takes drugs. sure, he loses tons of credibility but it doesn't mean what he is saying about the media and shit isn't true. also, you're not even taking into consideration how sober and clear minded the man was when he DID come forward about 9/11. all of what he went public about is still valid, so why don't you bring that back to the forefront of the discussion if you want to criticize and tell me what is so crack headish about it? all of his questions to obama are very well articulated and thought provoking, so what is it exactly that you are criticizing? the fact that he is a human being and has weaknesses to drugs? everyone has their demons and your nobody to judge him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silba Posted March 7, 2011 Share Posted March 7, 2011 he can comment on anything he wants to comment on... why do you have to be qualified to make a comment on something that everyone collectively experienced? if you don't want to take his comments seriously because he does drugs, then don't. that's your prerogative and no one can really say anything to you about it. it would make sense to a lot of people i'm sure if you said "listen, i don't agree with anything this man says because he is a crack head." sure.. completely legitimate. but, what i don't understand is at the same time you pay so much more attention to someone like Charlie Sheen instead of paying attention to actual scholars, physicists, authors, and real credible people who have gone public and lost their careers due to it. then you lump in the nonsense and bullshit with your reasoning as to why you disbelieve, and you dismiss all the material that is worth mentioning. just like you throw in ufo's, holograms, reptilians, and illuminati theories into every alternative 9/11 theory, you throw in Charlie Sheen's, Dylan Avery's, Alex Jones', and whatever else you can find that is unattractive into these debates as well to discredit it. you don't want to actually bring to the table any real scholarly material because it makes the actual debate look credible, so you pick and choose whatever whackyness is associated with the "movement" and you label people, mock them, troll them, laugh at them, and lump them all together in one category. it makes it easier for you to dismiss the entire thing and feel comfortable that you are right and they are wrong, that none of this can be possible because their just crazy nutjob drug addicted fools. but let's get real here for a second. i've heard and met plenty of drug addicts in my day speak about life, and a lot of the times these people have very REAL shit to say. i thought Charlie Sheen was being very REAL in those interviews, and i could give a fuck less if he takes drugs. sure, he loses tons of credibility but it doesn't mean what he is saying about the media and shit isn't true. also, you're not even taking into consideration how sober and clear minded the man was when he DID come forward about 9/11. all of what he went public about is still valid, so why don't you bring that back to the forefront of the discussion if you want to criticize and tell me what is so crack headish about it? all of his questions to obama are very well articulated and thought provoking, so what is it exactly that you are criticizing? the fact that he is a human being and has weaknesses to drugs? everyone has their demons and your nobody to judge him. Calm down all I said was he wasnt credible. When did I dismiss a theory? I just said he wasnt fit to be commenting on anything. and I never brought up reptilians or Illuminati-----what are you on br0? I think you're confsuing me for Theo, and by the way I dont see any reasoning behind the 9/11 being a inside job. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zig Posted March 7, 2011 Share Posted March 7, 2011 when i say you, i don't mean you personally i'm calm... i just like to write. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wearekilluminati Posted March 8, 2011 Share Posted March 8, 2011 there are too many disinformants and censors on this bitch......... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lord_casek Posted March 8, 2011 Author Share Posted March 8, 2011 Let's try this one more time. Charlie Sheen is irrelevant here. Let's try and get this thread back on track and stop bickering about unimportant crazy celebrities. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lord_casek Posted March 8, 2011 Author Share Posted March 8, 2011 One more time, unless you guys wanna keep acting like the National Enquirer 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silba Posted March 9, 2011 Share Posted March 9, 2011 One more time, unless you guys wanna keep acting like the National Enquirer This makes a lot of sense, looking at how he set it up and explained it thermite could have been used. but who did it? who planted the thermite? and why havent they came forward..... thats a lot of blood on their hands. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZOMBIELAZERS Posted March 9, 2011 Share Posted March 9, 2011 http://soundcloud.com/zombielazers/sandscript-css Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lord_casek Posted March 9, 2011 Author Share Posted March 9, 2011 This makes a lot of sense, looking at how he set it up and explained it thermite could have been used. but who did it? who planted the thermite? and why havent they came forward..... thats a lot of blood on their hands. Who benefits most? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silba Posted March 9, 2011 Share Posted March 9, 2011 Who benefits most? The companies rebuilding Iraq, the mercenary companies like BlackWater, Is that about right? Either way it puts the officials who let this happen in a really bad position because if they were to get caught thats treason of the highest degree, I dont see that as worth a few million bucks, or some oil fields in the Middle East Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lord_casek Posted March 9, 2011 Author Share Posted March 9, 2011 The companies rebuilding Iraq, the mercenary companies like BlackWater, Is that about right? Either way it puts the officials who let this happen in a really bad position because if they were to get caught thats treason of the highest degree, I dont see that as worth a few million bucks, or some oil fields in the Middle East Don't forget Larry Silverstein, the Bush administration, intel services, etc. Yes, it would be high treason if officials were to be caught. Trillions, Silba. Trillions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ILOTSMYBRAIN Posted March 9, 2011 Share Posted March 9, 2011 "They made the decision to pull it..." Oopsie. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheoHuxtable.. Posted March 10, 2011 Share Posted March 10, 2011 That was already proven to not be a demolition term. Silverstein was talking about pulling the rescue/firefighting operation, as in pulling all firefighters & police out of Building 7 because of the fear that it may collapse too (it was on fire on several stories and multiple support beams had been compromised from WTC 1's collapse). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zig Posted March 13, 2011 Share Posted March 13, 2011 oh please... if you seriously believe that... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheoHuxtable.. Posted March 13, 2011 Share Posted March 13, 2011 I do... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lord_casek Posted March 13, 2011 Author Share Posted March 13, 2011 One more time, unless you guys wanna keep acting like the National Enquirer Theo, care to address this? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abrasivesaint Posted March 15, 2011 Share Posted March 15, 2011 am i crazy, or does that resemble a charred body that pops out the building when hes talking about "pressure pules." very interesting video though. especially to consider that it could have been done while they were still building the building. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abrasivesaint Posted March 16, 2011 Share Posted March 16, 2011 i think my tin foil hat was to tight and i a little too high and over thought/ conspiracied, if thats even a word, his point when he was talking about them building the towers, i got watch that again and brush up on my WTC history and what not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lord_casek Posted March 16, 2011 Author Share Posted March 16, 2011 i think my tin foil hat was to tight and i a little too high and over thought/ conspiracied, if thats even a word, his point when he was talking about them building the towers, i got watch that again and brush up on my WTC history and what not. Yeah, you should. It's important to know what happened that day. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abrasivesaint Posted March 16, 2011 Share Posted March 16, 2011 ya i just skimmed through a few things, gonna read some longer stuff when i get the chance, also read more about the gulf war and the WTC truck bombing from 93. any suggestions of something specific i should read? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lord_casek Posted March 16, 2011 Author Share Posted March 16, 2011 ya i just skimmed through a few things, gonna read some longer stuff when i get the chance, also read more about the gulf war and the WTC truck bombing from 93. any suggestions of something specific i should read? Nothing in particular I can think of at the moment. I don't want to point you one way or another. If you really feel like it, watch and be super critical the following: and some sites http://ae911truth.org/ http://pilotsfor911truth.org/ http://patriotsquestion911.com/ Those should give you some good starting points for doing your own research and coming to your own conclusion. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abrasivesaint Posted March 19, 2011 Share Posted March 19, 2011 word, thanks, i'll check those out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SPORTO Posted March 24, 2011 Share Posted March 24, 2011 you might not have any balls but you might still have a gut gut says sumthings not right sleep fuckn tight Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ILOTSMYBRAIN Posted September 14, 2011 Share Posted September 14, 2011 What an excellent poem. ^^ http://lewrockwell.com/roberts/roberts324.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.