Milton Posted December 5, 2005 Share Posted December 5, 2005 That was Texas v. Johnson. he did join the majority, which is odd. Rehnquist, O'Connor, and Stevens of all people dissented. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gasfacevictm Posted December 21, 2005 Share Posted December 21, 2005 Originally posted by KING BLING@Nov 14 2005, 10:04 PM This is the idea: If a girl has herpes she is not required to tell you - even if she should. From a personal responcibility standpoint its a matter of whom you as a man choose to sleep with and the protections you take. From a legal principle standpoint - your body is your body, you are protected from forcfully doing anything to it (within reason) including seeking permission as an adult to have procedures, such as abortion, performed... The law should not compel individuals to seek permission from another in regards to there body. If you choose to visit a sick person you take the risk of catching it regardless of if you give permission. Moral: Be careful what you do so if a mistake happens, the person involved shares the idea that its a choice that will effect both of your lives... Quoted post true to a point but yet contradictive. it is a crime to wilfully give some one a disease, virus, etc...if in fact you knew you had it before you passed it to them. so how is that different? if someone has aids/hiv and knows it. then wilfully gives it to someone, you best believe i'd make sure they rotted in jail for the rest of their short life and or kill that motherfucker. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.