Jump to content

IRAK CREW CLOTHING


The Hipster

Recommended Posts

This forum is supported by the 12ozProphet Shop, so go buy a shirt and help support!
This forum is brought to you by the 12ozProphet Shop.
This forum is brought to you by the 12oz Shop.
  • Replies 371
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Originally posted by fatlaces@Dec 6 2004, 08:55 PM

Irak is a great crew but the designs just arent that great. the best is probably that Irak NY shirt. maybe they should make a shirt with that "Best things in life..." design.

 

clearly they're writers, not designers. but you cant knock them for trying to make a few bucks if they have a good thing going. i see these tees the same way i see concert shirts... if your a fan, you'll sport one, but like a concert shirt, it's not the pinnacle of fashion.

 

regardless, if people dont like it they dont have to buy it, but it seems kinda dumb to say they shouldnt have even tried.

 

*I dont mean this to you specifically, but to anyone that feels like somebody shouldnt bother. I say the more the merrier, and the wack shit will get weeded out via natural selection.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest imported_b0b

It is pretty obvious they are selling the "image" of Irak; Irak the brand as it were. That whole partying, drugs, racking and fighting thing - the designs are probably pretty irrelevant to the people they will appeal to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest fr8lover

if you wear any of those shirts and you aren't actually crew or friends of em, you should feel pretty stupid.

 

ps...a lot of the people pictured on this page are still writing graffiti, clothing line or not...i think posting every picture you could find of them is a little corny to be posting onto a graffiti message board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by fr8lover@Dec 7 2004, 08:41 AM

ps...a lot of the people pictured on this page are still writing graffiti, clothing line or not...i think posting every picture you could find of them is a little corny to be posting onto a graffiti message board.

 

these pictures are already in the public domain. if VS hasn't already picked up the copies of mass appeal and paper back where they appeared, then they never will. not to mention that these kids generally show up to parties and events like celebrities and definately dont try and maintain a low profile. clearly we have zero tolerance for turning people out, but this situation is not at all like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest fr8lover
Originally posted by Misteraven+Dec 7 2004, 02:26 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Misteraven - Dec 7 2004, 02:26 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-fr8lover@Dec 7 2004, 08:41 AM

ps...a lot of the people pictured on this page are still writing graffiti, clothing line or not...i think posting every picture you could find of them is a little corny to be posting onto a graffiti message board.

 

these pictures are already in the public domain. if VS hasn't already picked up the copies of mass appeal and paper back where they appeared, then they never will. not to mention that these kids generally show up to parties and events like celebrities and definately dont try and maintain a low profile. clearly we have zero tolerance for turning people out, but this situation is not at all like that.

[/b]

 

i understand. i feel the same way about all these pictures existing in the first place, but it's just a little funny when you post them up on a message board specifically for the discussion of graffiti. instead of a bunch of flicks, here's picturers of a bunch of dudes who write...i guess i just don't get it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

they are the ones pushing themselves and their 'brand' into the public eye.

Besides.... probably the WORST thing for any 'criminal' to show is a tattoo.

They dont go away and can very easily identify you. So making a t-shirt of your tattoo with your crew name on it?

 

if that isn't asking for trouble..... I dont know what is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

'nyc graff' and 'rest of the world graff' have nothing to do with one another really.

 

in ny, everything is a product, no matter what it is. everything is so compact and condensed that even your average 40 year old mom living in the city is atleast somewhat familiar with graff. also since everything from the restaurants you eat at to the jobs you have are all tied into some weird heirchy of status, it makes sense that even a writer can be 'someone', based on their notoriety. it's not about talent, it's just about namesake. it might be totally fleeting and ficle, but it definitely exists.

example: on halloween i ended up at some fucked up concert with some shitty ass band playing. there were seriously like 30 people there, but one of them happened to be sace, who looked quite a bit like joe dirt mixed with captain cave man. i assumed it was a costume, but looking at the above pictures, i realize he's just a dirt ass, which is amusing considering the insane fortune the grape vine puts him as heir to. anyway, of course, the entire room sort of revolved around him. it's strange, and it's surreal, but it's life. whatever.

 

what's my point? my point is that the rules of graff dont apply in ny, and the rules of ny dont apply to graff. some might overlap, but all in all, they're kind of different animals. 'irak' arent just guys who paint, they truly are 'celebrities' in the same way that dondi, futura, zephyr and lee where back in the 80's. they're still worthless in the grand scheme of things, but luckily for them, ny exists outside of that grand scheme. their clothes might not be 'cool' or 'well designed' to the rest of us, but when placed on the same time-line that brought us the 'ny minute', they make perfect sense. everything in ny is 'flash in the pan', because there are 6 million people all trying to cook on the same proverbial stove. the place is like boise idaho on crystal meth with ADHD.

 

this essay was brought to you by lewis blacks rant on minnesota and my desire to hear myself talk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah...basquiat does kind of suck though.

ha.

i've never understood what people saw in that dude.

i watched the movie and everything, still nothing.

 

 

oh, and for the record, giant borrowed that style of tattoo from latin america. he might have made it more prevelant in graff/hipster circles, but he certainly didn't invent it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally dont think giant's work is very original.

I'm not saying it isn't technically well executed or that

I dont really dig the style, but it's very clear where his

influences are rooted. Having said that......

 

That style applied to graf IS totally original.

Well I've never seen a writer do work like that before,

so in terms of 'grafitti' it is totally original. Yeah... paradox.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by seeking@Dec 7 2004, 06:03 PM

yeah...basquiat does kind of suck though.

ha.

i've never understood what people saw in that dude.

i watched the movie and everything, still nothing.

 

 

oh, and for the record, giant borrowed that style of tattoo from latin america. he might have made it more prevelant in graff/hipster circles, but he certainly didn't invent it.

 

 

basquiat did suck as far as what he put out to the public, but i think people dug his image more then anything....look at all the laim dudes get fame now off their laim art!

 

i used to love that movie too, until i read the book..... that movie made basquiat look like an timmid shameless punk.... the book is dope and is more the real story about the dude.... pretty fast read too...

i'm way more intreaged about basquiat cuz of his life style not his art work.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

a brief extract from an interview with Ryan McGinley talking about photographing IRAK:

 

 

AFH: You frequently photographed the IRAK graffiti crew. Are you interested in graffiti as an action or as an art form?

 

RM: I love the idea of graffiti but I am not really excited by its esthetics. Individual pieces and tags rarely interest me. What I love is the insanity of it as an action. I wouldn’t want to photograph a piece alone, but I love taking pictures of kids doing it. I have one image called Dash Bombing that is just a picture of this kid I know spraying graffiti on the side of a wall. I think it is a beautiful image. And, I love the idea of a kid writing his name hundreds of thousands of times, over and over and over because he feels he needs to.

 

AFH: Saying it like that makes it sound less rebellious than Obsessive Compulsive.

 

RM: Well, it is addictive to some. I am attracted to the mania of someone who goes to such extreme lengths to do their art. I love the illegality. It is really appealing to me that some kid will stand 40-stories up on a ledge or duck into a rat-packed tunnel alone at night just to produce his art. The only thing about it that doesn’t interest me is the final product. I have a few friends who are graffiti writers, including the IRAK crew, and I like that they are as obsessed with something as I am with taking pictures. I eat, sleep, move and breathe photography 24-7.

 

AFH: Graffiti and editoral photography are two genres often perceived as transitioning badly into galleries and museums. Do you agree that editoral photography and graffiti inherently loose something when taken indoors?

 

RM: No, strong art should be able to function anywhere. The art world is such a small, esoteric community, that it doesn’t appeal to me to only exhibit my stuff in galleries. I like having my work is books and magazines where I can reach the widest possible audience. I don’t discriminate between highbrow and lowbrow. Vice magazine reaches more kids than any gallery exhibition would give me access to. Any random person can pick up their free issue of Vice but an art magazine only appeals to a few.

 

honigman6-21-7.jpg

honigman6-21-4.jpg

 

 

rest of the feature here

Link to comment
Share on other sites

maybe basquiat did suck, maybe not. considering he rarely has pieces for sale on the open market, and buying one by making an offer on one in a private collection is gonna cost hundreds of thousands of dollars (if not millions), i'm not even sure it's subjective to comment on his talent.

 

incidently, i've heard rumor that the deal involving sony's purchase of mo-wax back a few years ago involved sony having to buy james lavelle a basquiat piece. since at the time none were for sale, they had to drop a small fortune buying one from a private collection or it was going to be a deal breaker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest imported_Tesseract

Market and essence of work is not to be confused. You can make the market bigtime with obvious talent or a very ineteresting persona or good connections or even all of the above and still you may never contribute anything worthwhile. What i mean by worthwhile is to be in the position where you're just being you and you change the way the game moves, after a while it seems like the game couldnt survive without you. Basquiat doesnt fall under this category at all, its not only that i dont like his work but i could never see how basquiats work opened new ways and put artists and people in general mind in a new rotation. I'm totally against the theory and vice of Warhols work but noone could say that he wasnt a crucial figure in art at the time, dude brought all kinds of viewing the world and art as a sum of the world..along with that he brought basquiat too. I dont think the appeal is based on his work but more on the background story of the man himself that the world was prepared to accept. Definitions of cool and interesting change really fast but the whole deal relies on either you make them or just fit the bill. To keep it simple, i think that basquiat is a classic 'right time, right place' case.

 

As far as irak goes, i dunno..shit is way to flashy for my taste and while i totally respect what they do and that they manage to come off like they do it aint nothing of importnace to me. I'm not willing to give excuses like 'they're not designers just writers'...its not that important talking so much about a t-shirt but i cant overide the fact that raven is also a writer, made the best graff mag in the market, and produces superior tshirts that arent sold out solely because the same hype doesnt suround him.

 

What else, giant is dope. period

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yo, there are entirely too many names and pictures floating around on this thread. Somebody needs to jump in and do something about it. They may be designers or whatever, but they still paint (at least some of them...a little), so it's best to keep that shit confidential.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest imported_Tesseract

I believe its their desicion to be so. If you have your face and tag together on magazines that circulate all over the city you paint you obsiously want it to happen. We protect the people that their data was exposed without their will or willing, we're not here to play world safety police.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...