Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

JOHN TITOR's world predictions

Recommended Posts

john titor the following is a section of some of the comments this dude says happens ... this dude said he came for the future ( ok? ) he made his prediction in 2000 and 2001,,, all of which came true so far, below is whats next to happen,,. I just thinks its funny but interesting enought to share,, concedering it could happen .. take with a grain of salt....





What are your memories of 2036?


I remember 2036 very clearly. It is difficult to describe 2036 in detail without spending a great deal of time explaining why things are so different.


In 2036, I live in central Florida with my family and I'm currently stationed at an Army base in Tampa. A world war in 2015 killed nearly three billion people. The people that survived grew closer together. Life is centered on the family and then the community. I cannot imagine living even a few hundred miles away from my parents.


There is no large industrial complex creating masses of useless food and recreational items. Food and livestock is grown and sold locally. People spend much more time reading and talking together face to face. Religion is taken seriously and everyone can multiply and divide in their heads.


Life has changed so much over my lifetime that it's hard to pin down a "normal" day. When I was 13, I was a soldier. As a teenager, I helped my dad haul cargo. I went to college when I was 31 and I was recruited to "time travel" shortly after that. Again, I suppose an average day in 2036 is like an average day on the farm.


There is a civil war in the United States that starts in 2005. That conflict flares up and down for 10 years. In 2015, Russia launches a nuclear strike against the major cities in the United States (which is the "other side" of the civil war from my perspective), China and Europe. The United States counter attacks. The US cities are destroyed along with the AFE (American Federal Empire)...thus we (in the country) won. The European Union and China were also destroyed. Russia is now our largest trading partner and the Capitol of the US was moved to Omaha Nebraska.


One of the biggest reasons why food production is localized is because the environment is affected with disease and radiation. We are making huge strides in getting it cleaned up. Water is produced on a community level and we do eat meat that we raise ourselves.


After the war, early new communities gathered around the current Universities. That's where the libraries were. I went to school at Fort UF, which is now called the University of Florida. Not too much is different except the military is large part of people's life and we spend a great deal of time in the fields and farms at the "University" or Fort.


The Constitution was changed after the war. We have 5 presidents that are voted in and out on different term periods. The vice president is the president of the senate and they are voted separately.


Why is time travel used?


Right now, its used to get information or "items" that would be helpful in getting a post WWIII world back to a normal condition.


I am here for personal reasons. For a few months now, I have bee trying to alert anyone that would listen to the possibility of a civil war in the United States in 2005. Does that seem more likely now? Actually it's quite amazing to see what's happening. I have been trying to get people to pay attention for the last few months but to see it unfold is very interesting. Before I leave, I'll try and post my report.


You assume I am here to start a war?


Consider this: You are a time traveler who wishes to go back in time to 1941 because your grandparents live close to Pearl Harbor in Hawaii. You realize you can't stop the war but you may be able to help them prepare for it. Strangely, December 7th comes and goes with no sneak attack. As the war in Europe rages on, Japan fails to join the axis power, there is no war in the Pacific and the United States remains neutral. Then, you watch as Germany begins to develop the atomic bomb… all by themselves.


For a change, I have a question for all of you. I want you to think very hard. What major disaster was expected and prepared for in the last year and a half that never happened?


As far as war goes, I have faith you are quite capable of starting one all by yourself. I am hard pressed to accept any criticism on my outlook on that subject. Growing up might have been a vastly different experience for me than it was for most of you. Personal responsibility, determination, honor, friendship and self-reliance are not just words we try to live up to or fantasize about.


On my worldline, life is not easy. We live in a world recovering from years of war, poison, destruction and hate. All of it, courtesy of the thinking and actions of people that live right now in the same world you do, worrying about which stocks to buy or whether or not a stranger is lying to them on the Internet.


I believe that hardship and challenge develop character and community. My first experience with war came when I joined a shotgun infantry unit at the age of thirteen. In the 4 years I served as a "rebel", I watched hundreds of people get shot, burn and bleed to death. I know exactly where I was and every detail of the exact moment the first nuclear warheads began falling on Jacksonville. I know the pain and regret of not acting soon enough to enjoy a relationship as a loved one dies of brain cancer from a war that gained nothing.


How can you possibly criticize me for any conflict that comes to you? I watch every day what you are doing as a society. While you sit by and watch your Constitution being torn away from you, you willfully eat poisoned food, buy manufactured products no one needs and turn an uncaring eye away from millions of people suffering and dying all around you. Is this the "Universal Law" you subscribe to?


Perhaps I should let you all in on a little secret. No one likes you in the future. This time period is looked at as being full of lazy, self-centered, civically ignorant sheep. Perhaps you should be less concerned about me and more concerned about that.


Imagine you are Jewish and you are able to travel back in time to Germany in 1935. All around you are the patterns of thinking and action that will lead to a great deal of harm, death and destruction in just a few years. You have the advantage of knowing what will come but no one will listen to you. In fact, they think you're insane and the situations you describe could never happen.


What I feel is not anger, it is sadness that you cannot see what I see.


What event started the war? Can it be stopped?


The war is a result of faulty politics and desperation from Western

leadership during the US civil war. Yes, I suppose you could stop it.


Are some areas of the United States safer than others?


Take a close look at the county-by-county voting map from the last



Were biological or chemical weapons used in the war? Were any weapons used that effected people's minds?


Yes there were biological and chemical weapons used. No mind control weapons but there are new "non-lethal" weapon systems that turn out to be quite lethal.


What would you say to any world leaders who might be reading this right now?


Revel in your confidence today because you will not win tomorrow.


What are the social prejudices in 2036?


Yes there are. However, as odd as it may sound, it serves a useful purpose in my time. First, you must realize that your experiences with "prejudice" and mine are different. I would characterize the intolerance you have here as a result of ignorance and fear. I have observed that people with unfounded and irrational fears about their fellow man in this time have the luxury of not having their beliefs tested.


After the war, much of the prejudice you have now was swept away by simple necessity. People had to work and fight together just to survive. This has a way of opening a person's eyes as to the value of fellow human beings.


What difference does the color of a man's skin make when you are both fighting against the same enemy to survive or find water or grow food? On my worldline, if a man doesn't pull his weight in the community, then we feel prejudice towards him as a burden to us. This feeling of shame he experiences then makes him realize his responsibilities.


Is there some sort of new world government in place by 2011?


On my worldline in 2011, the United States is in the middle of a civil war that has dramatic effects on most of the other Western governments.


Does the continuing conflict between Arabs and Jews have anything to do with the upcoming war?




Do you still have an American flag? What does it look like in 2036?


Yes, we still have the flag. There is a debate about changing it from 50 stars to 5.


Do any of the states have new names?


Not that I can think of... No major cities anyway. I am aware that some

smaller towns changed their names after the war and most universities have the word "fort" before them on my worldline.


Is it still safe to fish in 2036?


Yes, we can fish. There are some areas that are still too dangerous to

spend a lot of time in so we can't fish in those areas.


I think Russia is still very likely to attack the United States with nuclear weapons. It's hard to imagine being here to see it.


You are also correct but I want to add a twist to your thinking. Russia's enemy in the United States is not you, the average person. Russia's enemy is the United States government.


Does the current relationship between Arabs and Jews have anything to do with the coming war?


Real disruptions in world events begin with the destabilization of the West as a result of degrading US foreign policy and consistency. This becomes apparent around 2004 as civil unrest develops near the next presidential election. The Jewish population in Israel is not prepared for a true offensive war. They are prepared for the ultimate defense. Wavering western support for Israel is what gives Israel's neighbors the confidence to attack. The last resort for a defensive Israel and its offensive Arab neighbors is to use weapons of mass destruction. In the grand scheme of things, the war in the Middle East is a part of what's to come, not the cause.


Does anything happen in the year 2012? I've heard stories about the world ending.


In my 2012, I was 14 years old spending most of my time living, running and hiding in the woods and rivers of central Florida. The civil war was in its 7th year and the world war was three years away. Yes, there are unusual events in 2012 but they do not cause the world to end. Unfortunately, I have decided not to discuss events that you or I can do anything about. It is important that they be a surprise. Perhaps you are familiar with the story of the Red Sea and the Egyptians?


How and why do the Arabs Jews become entangled in the civil war of the U.S.A?


They are not directly involved but political situations are dependant on Western stability, which collapses in 2005.


The Arab countries appear to have weapons of mass destruction. Do they use them against America?


Not against America but they are used against each other.


Young people should look forward to the future while older people don't see many days ahead of them. I think it's pointless for you to ask us to worry about politics if we are all doomed.


It saddens me that you do not realize your true worth as a keeper of information and experience. Perhaps the end that we fear will open your eyes to your true value as an individual. Young people need wisdom. The captain of the ship knows where the lifeboats are.


I just saw another story today about the Russians moving Nukes into the Balkans to thwart any future expansion by NATO. I also haven't heard anyone take me up on my "information experiment" on the IBM 5100 or check out the information I've given you about the UNIX failure in 2038. With all due respect, I find it hard to take some of you seriously.


What happens to (name of person asking question)? Am I involved in Time Travel? What of the (armed) resistance?


I have no idea what happens to you in your future. There was a resistance on my worldline but their goal was to maintain power and control over other people. We killed most of them by 2020.


Where is the new US capitol?


The new US capitol is in Omaha Nebraska.


Your future seems to be fixated on killing people. Isn't there a criminal justice system or do you just enjoy killing people?


Perhaps you could take the dialogue in question and post it with your question. However, if I understand you, you're asking about death on my worldline. Yes, it is more a part of our lives than it is yours (at least for now) and capitol punishment is a reality.


Why are you so interested in the Constitution?


After the war, the United States had split into five separate regions based on the various factors and military objectives they each had. There was a great deal of anger directed toward the Federal government and a revival of states rights was becoming paramount. However, in their attempt to create an economic form of government, the political and military leaders at the time decided to hold one last Constitutional Congress in order to present a psychological cohesion from the old system.


During this Congress, the leaders discovered and decided that coming up with a new and better form of government was nearly impossible. The original Constitution itself was not the problem it was the ignorance of the people that lived under it.


Don't you like your "new" Constitution?


From my viewpoint, it's very effective. I am a very strong believer in local or state's rights.


You appear to be a Libertarian who stresses the need for mankind to get back to basics. You also seem to be a gun rights activist.


I suppose from your vantage point that's a fair assessment. I would call myself more of a centrist. Although I understand the "gun rights" issue here, I cannot relate to it all and it is a common point of argument with my mother.


I keep saying her tune will change in about ten years and she'll be cleaning shotguns in her sleep but it doesn't help. If it makes you feel any better, I never shot anyone who wasn't trying to kill me.

In the last few months, I have had numerous extended conversations online and there are quite a few things I've said which can easily be checked out but haven't. I get no pleasure out of being right when it comes to CJD disease, war in the Middle East or suffering people in far away lands. There's nothing like the look on someone's face when you tell them 100,000 people will be dead tomorrow. In my travels, I have discovered that most people really don't want to know about the future because if its different than what they want it ticks them off. Actually, I don't blame them.



I disapprove of war because I think it's immoral. What do you think?


I disapprove of murder. Man as a species is incapable of changing his nature through will alone and war is a tool of biology. The ability for war sleeps in each one of us and we must decide what we will do before the beast awakens. As for morality, again I point to the "universal" balance of good and evil. For every worldline where there is peace, there is a worldline that has destroyed itself.



(4) I'm glad to see it's so easy for to dismiss the Middle East. Yes, I suppose it is a no brainer but pretty soon it will be a "no arrmer" and a "no legger".



The year 2008 was a general date by which time everyone will realize the world they thought they were living in was over. The civil war in the United States will start in 2004. I would describe it as having a Waco type event every month that steadily gets worse. The conflict will consume everyone in the US by 2012 and end in 2015 with a very short WWIII.



If you could change one thing about your government right now, what would it be?



The United States is still a representative republic in 2036 but it was touch and go for a while. After the war, the U.S. had divided into 5 general areas based on their economic and defensive strengths. Many people blamed the government organization for the war and the last Constitutional Congress was held in 2020 to officially scrap the Constitution and start over. Fortunately, this exercise in anger pointed out how hard it was to come up with anything better. It was decided the document wasn't at fault. As a result, there have been a few small changes to the Constitution and the executive branch but you would easily recognize it. The average citizen is more educated about the Constitution and aware of the rights and responsibilities it gives them. Federal power has been decentralized and the focus of daily politics is in the state senates. Federal law has also been streamlined but much harder to change or make additions to.



If I knew someone was going to die, and there was a chance I could stop it, I have a moral obligation to do something about it.



I can think of a couple of examples.



If the Egyptians knew the Red Sea was going to drown them, do you think they would have pursued Moses?



If you could go back in time to 1941 and tell the radar operators to take a second look at the radar screen on December 7th, would you? Before you say yes and accept that parade in your honor down Main Street, perhaps you should go forward in time and see if the U.S still had the motivation to make the A-bomb before Hitler did.



As far as the war goes, my best advice is to find at least 5 people within 100 miles of you that you trust with your life.



Can you give us some personal stories of your past?



I was born in 1998 so I do share some childhood memories with all of you. I remember going to Disney World at Christmas and I remember going to the beach in Daytona. When the civil "conflict" started and got worse, people generally decided to either stay in the cities and lose most of their civil rights under the guise of security or leave the cities for more isolated and rural areas. Our home was searched once and the neighbor across the street was arrested for some unknown reason. That convinced my father to leave the city.



From the age of 8 to 12, we lived away from the cities and spent most of our time in a farm community with other families avoiding conflict with the federal police and National Guard. By that time, it was pretty clear that we were not going back to what we had and the division between the "cities" and the "country" was well defined. My father made a living by putting together 12-volt electrical systems and sailing "commodities" up and down the coast of Florida. I spent most of my time helping him.



Outright open fighting was common by then and I joined a shotgun infantry unit in 2011. I served with the "Fighting Diamondbacks" for about 4 years. (Hearing in my right ear isn't as good as I would like it). The civil war ended in 2015 when Russia attacked the U.S. cities (our enemy), China and Europe. As unusual and bad as my childhood might seem, I wouldn't trade it for anything.



Africa is not a pleasant place to be in 2036 although I would characterize it as recovering.



(5) Will it still be lawful for me to own handguns?



I thought owning a handgun was legal in the United States? Yes, being familiar with firearms (along with the other responsibilities of the Constitution) becomes an important part of people's lives in thirty years.



Russia and China have always had a very strange relationship. Even the news I see now indicates that continued weapons deals to allies, border clashes and overpopulation will lead to hostilities. The West will become very unstable which gives China the confidence to "expand". I'm assuming you are all aware that China has millions of male soldiers right now that they know will never be able to find wives. The attack on Europe is in response to a unified European army that masses and moves East from Germany. Also, please be aware that from my viewpoint, Russia attacked my enemy who was in the U.S. cities. Yes, the U.S. did counter attack.



I would characterize world politics as two boxers who have just gone multiple rounds and they're both pretty beat up. I'm sure someone out there wants to kill us but no one is very organized yet. There is a great deal of fear over rogue groups coming across un-launched missile systems, 55-gallon drums of Anthrax or portable nuclear weapons.



Korea United?



I guess you could say that. Taiwan, Japan and Korea were all "forcefully annexed" before N Day.



I don't remember a great deal about media coverage during the civil conflicts. I would probably characterize it the same way you see coverage of Waco, Ruby Ridge and Elian Gonzalez.



From my viewpoint, yes, this is an alternate timeline. From your viewpoint, no.



Australia is sort of interesting in what is unknown. After the war, they were not very cooperative or friendly (can't blame them really). It is known they did repulse a Chinese invasion and most of their cities were hit. They have a trading relationship with the U.S. but I would characterize them as reclusive and ticked off.



The "enemy" that was attacked by Russia in the U.S. was the forces of the government you live under right now.



After reading the questions, I want to paint a picture that may help with the general theme of our collective experience in 2036. The war had very profound affects on people and how they relate to each other. As individuals, almost everyone in 2036 is very familiar with death. We all have stories of loved ones that have died from disease, war or acts of inhumanity. Most of us have even taken part in dishing the same thing out to the other side. As a result, we have become far more compassionate to the ones we love but mush less forgiving to those who don't pull their weight. We are more accepting of other's differences in our community because we depend on them to survive. We are also more conservative with our resources and closer to God because for a period, life on Earth was Hell.



The other major difference is in the concept of good and evil. With multiple worlds come multiple decisions and outcomes. For every good act, there is an equal and possible bad act on another worldline. Taken to the extreme, this must mean that in God's eyes, there is no total good and total bad in the superverse. It balances itself out to infinity. I believe we are judged on the decisions we make as individuals and the good/evil I see on my worldline is an illusion that has no worth to God. My reaction to it is what's important to God. Although this may seem rather heartless, it does allow me to see past the evil that people do and acknowledge the core of potential goodness inside them.



2. I am currently based in Tamp Florida in Hillsborough County.



3. Yes I am free but I have obligations as a citizen. Everyone is required to have basic military training and provide a period of time for community service. It is very much like a type of mandatory National Guard service + Peace Corps.



4. Yes civil liberties are more important. You will feel the same after having your house searched a couple of times.



5. We do not live in a racist society but definitely a prejudice one. Everyone carries their own water.



6. Our government looks very much like yours. It is a representative republic.



7. My definition of a patriot is anyone who defends the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic.



8. Religion has become far less centralized. Extremes tend to bring you closer to God so I would characterize religion and spirituality as a much more of a personal institution.



15. I'm not aware of any "mind control" devices being used on you now. However, there are a great many "non lethal" weapon systems in development that turn out to be quite lethal. Sometimes I watch your television programs that show SWAT teams using new non-lethal weapons. They usually start out with, "In the future, the army and police will fight its enemies with new weapons systems…" When they use the word "enemy", they're talking about YOU! You don't really think the Marines are going to jump out of helicopters overseas with sticky goop, pepper spray and seizure lights, do you?



17. Yes, Europe is a mess.



18. Yes, I think the New World Order idea tried to establish itself. I would consider them the combination of the old U.S. federal system, Europe, Canada and Australia.



21. Yes, homosexuals are in the army. You tend to look past the individual differences of people when their job is to protect your life.



28. The 21st century has awhile to go but the most significant person in my opinion is the farmer-general who led us to victory.



35. It's hard to say what the exact racial make up of the U.S. is. I would say it's probably the same minus 130 million people or so.



42. South America went relatively unharmed. However, there is still a great deal of internal conflict with conventional arms.



Yes, EMP took out a great number of electronic devices. That's one of the reasons why we don't have reliable technology laying around. However, in the opening hours of N Day, the Russians did not launch any high altitude detonations. They knew we would most likely clean up after them so they wanted everyone outside the cities to be able to communicate. Most of the warheads that hit the cities came in threes and exploded close to the ground. The heavy EMP damage was isolated to those areas.



Why do you keep telling us about the war? How do you know that will even happen in our worldline? Something may have already changed and it won't happen at all.



Yes, you are correct! However, I am not confident things are different enough for you to avoid the conflict. You may also consider the possibility that a world with no war is far less desirable in the long run. In response to your other point, your assumptions about causality are correct but my personal morality still comes into play. I won't deviate from my three rules because of the way I would feel about myself.



John talks about a civil war being started between the Democrats and Republicans. Later, this escalates into WW3 and he mentions that it is a good thing for us.



I don't believe I ever said the war was between Democrats and Republicans. If I am incorrect, please point that out. It doesn't exactly escalate as much as it opens the door for other aggression. Yes, I think the war would be good for society and I would be happy to debate that with you.



John tells us to buy a gun, find 5 friends, and get a bicycle. This conflicts with his comments about killing us all off.



If you could point out how this violates the three guidelines I stated earlier, I would give it considerable thought. Perhaps you are correct and that was a mistake. Again, I don't believe I said I want to kill you. Personally, I think murder is wrong. You seem to be pretty good at that yourself.



John mentions the war was between the cities of America, Russia, China, etc.

Hmm, are you familiar with the Russian partisan movement in WWII?



Hmm, are you familiar with the Russian partisan movement in WWII?


John says the civil war leads to the world war in 2015. The civil war lasts for ten years?



It's 2004. I apologize for a missed key (very observant - we all need good critics). Perhaps our definition of war is different. I would define it as a conflict where organized groups engage in maneuver and armed conflict. The first U.S. civil war lasted 4 years and the English civil war lasted 6. How long is too long?



What is the exact date that the war starts? If you can't remember, can you tell us the month?



I remember the exact date. When it comes, it will not be a surprise.



The animal Kingdom is alive and well. I'm sure it suffered but there fewer people infringing on animal's habitats now. Nuclear war is a very undesirable thing but it is not the end of the world. There are areas and cities we can't enter and the environment did suffer a great deal of damage but we are recovering. Isn't Hiroshima a thriving city today? The major physical affects include skin cancer, infertility, infection, etc. Almost everyone has some sort of physical remnant from the war.



Who is the major super power in 2036?



It depends on how you define power. If you mean military, the world has developed into an odd balance. There are plenty of nuclear weapons left but if anyone uses them they, will be instantly erased from the planet by everyone else, regardless of the politics. We are very tired of war.



Are the two political parties still Republicans and Democrats?



There are no Republicans or Democrats to speak of. There are now over 10 major political parties.



How many States are there?



The states, as you know them, still exist but their political power has been combined with other states around them. There are now 5 major geopolitical areas in the United States.



Which states are the worst to live in?



When you can't drink the water its bad everywhere.



Were only cities along the Eastern US hit in the Nuclear War, or all over the country?



Cities and large military areas in the entire country.



Was a lot of the US 18-24 age group killed in the war because of a draft?






Which countries are on our side in the war?



Don't have much to add there.



Which country gets the worst in the war?



Again, the entire world is affected. Even if you don't take a direct hit, dying crops and no water can ruin your day.



Do you feel some pleasure in breathing clean air and not having to check a radiation counter every few miles?



Yes I do. However there is a fear about being here that I can only define as uncertainty. When I walk around in 2001, the air smells clean but I wonder if it really is. In 2036, there is no gray. The air is either clean or it will kill you. That feeling is very overwhelming when I eat here.



I would hope the location I live in would be spared (the Hawaiian Islands).



My parents went to Hawaii on their Honeymoon. My dad told me a quick story about going to a fast food store and paying 6 or 7 dollars for a hamburger. I got an image in my head of a huge tanker filled with frozen hamburgers headed into the Pacific. Hawaii is very dependant on the mainland for food, isn't it?



What exactly happens to the water?



Yes, radiation affected the water but that can always be distilled out. There are biological hazards that cannot. In addition, fresh water is hard to come by without talking to someone with a gun first.



You stated elsewhere that Australia repulses a Chinese invasion. Does this mean Australian government side with your enemy?



There were deep divisions in Australia also. I would associate it more with a powder keg than a civil war.



You have said you will not participate in helping anyone avoid 'death by probability'. Yet many things you have said could have caused an individual to do or not do something that will now result dying, or escaping death.



It would help if you could give an example. If you are referring to the conflict and war in your future, I'm not sure I'm specific enough to help any individuals avoid anything. Suggesting there is a war coming is a bit different than saying avoid Washington DC at 3:45 AM on March 12, 2015.



Is remote viewing used to gather military intelligence?



I am only aware of it from this worldline. I don't know otherwise.



Is there a Global Superpower state?



Being a superpower only makes you a target. There is an uneasy balance in the world now that everyone "probably" has nukes, chems or bios. We don't just bomb people for the hell of it anymore. Military power is based on the number of autonomous fighting men who are actually willing to fight.



What weapons did you use to protect yourself? Do you have a weapon now?


I used a shotgun in the war. Yes, I think it's prudent to be prepared for anything.


Your enemy was in the cities. Was the President in 2005 also on the enemy side? How did you feel personally about the President then?


The President or "leader" in 2005 I believe tried desperately to be the next Lincoln and hold the country together but many of their policies drove a larger wedge into the Bill of Rights. The President in 2009 was interested only in keeping his/her power base.


Was China your enemy?


Not my enemy? I never fought any Chinese but their ability to hit Western cities with missiles made a lot of people unhappy.


Does China have a manned space program between 2001 and 2036?


I believe they are pretty close to putting a man in orbit. It shouldn't surprise you if they do that soon.


Your prediction of (national politics) pending disintegration, beginning in three short years, is impossible.



Have you see the documentary on Waco? Just for argument's sake, what do you think would happen if information were discovered that confirmed the worst accusations made against the law enforcement officers there? Would you hope nothing?



The idea of a farmer general leaving his fields to lead his country's troops to victory is an old one.



Yes, I often think about that when I see pictures of "my" farmer general in Omaha. It's a large bronze depiction holding a shotgun in one hand a copy of the Constitution in the other. He is looking up at the sky in defiance of God after his father was killed.



How far from what size city is it the safest to be?



A 10 Kiloton nuclear weapon will vaporize metal for about ½ a mile and have a heat effect for about 3 miles. A 100 Megaton nuclear weapon will vaporize metal to 35 miles and have a heat effect to about 250 miles. I believe the largest nuclear weapon ever built and tested was about 60 megatons.



As I recall, the popular strategy toady is to strike targets with multiple numbers of smaller warheads. The 100 Kt to 1 Mt are the most popular. I believe there are about 150 - 200 major cities in the US and half as many military targets. Please correct me someone if I am grossly incorrect.



Should we be stockpiling guns?



The answer to this is NO! You will draw a great deal of negative attention to yourself. I recommend becoming familiar with firearms. This means taking a safety course and learning to shoot and clean many different types. There will be plenty of guns around when you need them.



What kind of people will be the ones least trustworthy?



The people with the most to lose if the world changes, Camel through the eye of a needle?



Is the conflict racial?



Not at all. In fact, I would say it goes a long way toward erasing racial problems.



Does the civil war start in such a way that those willing will have time to remove themselves to safer locations.



Yes. You will be forced to ask yourself how many civil rights you will give up to feel safe.



Will you readily be able to identify the enemy?



They will be the ones arresting and holding people without due process.



Does living near a river take care of water problems?



There is an odd saying that might be appropriate here. Safe is anywhere a hungry person can't walk in three days. Water is important but you must consider that when people need it they will know where to get it. I would not plan on planting myself permanently next to a water source. Yes, distillation dose make water safe but the runoff is highly dangerous. Please remember that distillation is not boiling.



How are the five people within the 100 miles contacted?



The goal is to have a place to go other than your house and to be able to trust someone with your life. Foster those relationships now.



Do communications stay intact during the war?



Main communication systems no, CB, sideband and non-repeating short-wave, yes.



Be mobile. Set aside the things you absolutely would need and can carry on your back. You will not be able to stay anywhere indefinitely even with provisions and firearms.



Will soldiers be asked to kill their countrymen?



I'm not positive but don't they sign a small piece of paper now asking them if they would have a problem with that?



Do you remember any poetry after 2001 in your past?



A Soldier's Winter



The day before it wasn't snowing.



The trees are strangers, leering, disapproving in the ash of winter ..my world, my life, my wandering path.



I pray God's eyes may once again gaze upon me and remind me that I am still His child.



I only (think) I remember the first line but the last one I remember. It has quite a few more lines that I don't remember. It is rumored this was written first as a letter by a soldier. After he died it was added to and edited by others. In my opinion, it has become a symbol for the collective guilt my parents' generation feels for what became of the world.



Does distillation remove radioactivity from water?



It removes the dust and dirt particles that are radioactive.



You said that your culture was centered around Universities. Weren't they wiped out in the war?



Not all major universities are in large cities.



How do most people die during the war?



In this order: Starvation - Disease - Bullet Wounds - Radiation.



You said that there will be a big war. Can you at least tell us which cities will be nuked?



No I won't do that. However, I submit to you that when the moment comes it will be absolutely plain as day that you are unsafe in the cities. The millions people that stay will choose to stay. That's what comes as a surprise.



You say you don't want to effect anything by giving information but you could change this worldline just by talking about the war, or anything for that matter.



I don't believe that knowing a possible future makes it happen. You are capable of changing your worldline for the better right now. None of the things I have said will be a surprise. They were set in motion ten, twenty, even thirty years ago. Are you really surprised to find out that Iraq has nukes now or is that just BS to whip everyone up into accepting the next war?



Nuclear warfare doesn't seem to be the biggest form of fighting in the future.



Nuclear war will be very effective at destroying an enemy's economy and the people's will to fight.



I doubt nuclear warheads are going to be shot from each end of the globe.



I would caution against that. That's exactly what "they" want you to think while they continue to develop smaller and more accurate MIRV's. Have you ever seen a neutron bomb the size of a basketball?



John, you say one of the hardest things to do in 2036 is find clean water. You also say you only trust food you've grown. Is any of this a result of your experiences with biological warfare?



Yes and no. Yes, biological warfare and accidents do cause a great deal of problems but the lack of a working infrastructure also hinders the continuation of the food manufacturing you depend on now.



The most likely leader of a war movement like the one you describe would most likely be a Farmer.



Throughout history, farmers have often been a target of oppression because they are absolutely necessary to civilization but too busy to defend themselves. If you push a farmer too far, they stop growing food and have nothing to do but hide in the woods and shoot back.



You say you were in the militia fighting the US Army. I would think civilians would have no chance of successfully fighting the military.



You must realize that why people are fighting is more important that what they are fighting with. The conflict was not about taking and holding ground it was about order and rights. They were betting that people wanted security instead of freedom and they were wrong.



Is it a stalemate with the resistance/militia hiding out until the cities are wiped out allowing them to surface?



The cities were not isolated because of them; they were isolated because of us.



You cite the approximate number of cities and military bases intact before the nuclear attack. Are they all hit?



Nuclear weapons and guidance systems are less than perfect. Most targets receive more than one warhead but some of them were more accurate than others. I would estimate the overall accuracy was around 60 to 70 percent.



Three days walk from where?



In my experience, a motivated starving person is only capable of walking about three days. The more distance you put between yourself and anyone who is likely to be hungry, the better.



Does anyone stay neutral during the war?



Some try to.



Does anyone lead a normal life during the civil war?






You say the civil war lasts from 2004 to 2008 and then the short big war in 2015. What do the years from 2008 to 2015 look like? How long does WWIII last.



I'm not sure I said that exactly. By 2008, I would say the civil conflict is pretty much at everyone's doorstep. Western instability during the conflict leads to the attack in 2015. WWIII is very short with a longer period of mop up.



You mention Canadians but I don't think you mentioned the impact on that country.



There's not a great deal I know about Canada except to say they were pretty much in the same type of conflict. They did have the Dew Line you know.



I must preface the following with a bit of melodrama. I feel a bit unqualified to answer the next few questions for the following reason. The way you and I look at life and death and its relative value is radically different. As any other soldier can tell you, once you watch a man's arm come off from a bullet you just fired or have been close enough to feel someone's last breath on your face, it changes you. I can only describe it in two distinct waves. The first feeling is power. You won when it counted and survived. All the personal shortcomings and faults you've carried with you your whole life just melt away in a savage euphoria.



If there's time to think about it, the next wave comes shortly after and is underlined by overwhelming guilt. You just killed someone and now God might be ticked off. Fortunately, the second feeling goes away quickly when the shooting starts again and gets shorter and shorter after every battle. After all, why would God put you in this situation? The point is, I personally do not like going through that cycle and the decisions I make about life and death might not be the ones you would expect me to make.



How come it doesn't bother you that people may die through your inaction yet you find it "morally wrong" that you might affect lives by active involvement?



I'm not sure I said it didn't bother me, I only stated I won't interfere on purpose. Again I refer to a historical example. Before Pearl Harbor was attacked in 1941, a small group of US soldiers were experimenting with a new technology called RADAR. As the Japanese planes were flying toward the island, they actually picked them up in time to thwart the surprise attack. Unfortunately, they were unfamiliar with the equipment and figured it wasn't working correctly. As you are aware, the ruthlessness of the Japanese "sneak" attack galvanized the US people into entering WWII.



As a time traveler it would be easy for me to take a short hike up that hill where the RADAR operators were and point out to them that indeed the equipment was working just fine and they should probably call it in. Assuming they believed me, it is arguable that my lone single action could start a chain of events that would allow the US to meet the Japanese planes and stop them from attacking the battleships. As a result, the US people would still be angry but not motivated to enter the war fully since the Japanese were not a perceived threat. Thus, you don't begin research on the atomic bomb until well after Hitler has already dropped a couple on London.



I could save thousands of men on the Arizona at the cost of millions in London. I just don't know how one life will affect another. However, if I were standing next to a soldier who was about to be shot by a passing Japanese plane, I would push him to safety. I realize this is inconsistent on a small scale but I am tired of watching people die in front of me. If there is a price to pay for that than so be it.



Isn't it just as wrong to affect lives through inaction as it is through action?



Why are you concerned about what I might do to corrupt your worldline when you have no problem letting other people do it around you every day? Do you blame yourself for not taking any action right now to "save" people living on your streets or suffering from poverty and disease? Besides, how exactly would you propose I decide who to tell and who not to tell? (provided I knew anything at all).



Your immediate decision, in itself, is its own authority.



What God judges about my decision is the only authority. Again, all the things you claim I can do you are capable of also.



If good and evil achieve a balance in the larger picture, the question of you being required to decide who lives or dies is moot.



It's not moot to me. To tell you the truth, I'm afraid. I don't want the responsibility of being expected to know who lives and who dies. I know it would change me for the worse. Besides, how can you be sure my "inaction" now isn't a result of something I've already screwed up and I'm trying to fix it? Javier might be right after all. Thanks for the good questions.



I would still like to know what population makes a city big.



Cities become targets because of their military and economic value. Any large area supported by a civil infrastructure is likely to be on that list.



Your time sounds grim. Are you tempted to finish your mission and then retire in the 1970's?



Not at all. I'm anxious to get home.



Do they start pushing for legalization earlier than the war?



It's not really an issue of the government letting you do something; It's more like they have other things to worry about. Don't you feel you're capable of taking care of yourself? If you want to take mood-altering drugs, why should my opinions stop you from that? They don't stop you from taking alcohol, tobacco or fast food.



In any case, it also lets Darwin take over. One of the reasons drug abuse isn't a major problem in 2036 is because no one wants to die from it and everyone else who did is dead.



WACO with criminal violations of the law either directly or impliedly as is done in this video, simply doesn't accord with the real facts.



A large point of contention seems to be the "flashes" of light that appear to be gunfire that were recorded from the aircraft flying over the compound. The FBI has stated that these flashes were sunlight reflections. I find that rather interesting since the camera was not a visible light camera, it was a thermal camera. If the federal forces learned anything from WACO it was to install more reliable suppressors on their automatic weapons and don't use flash grenades that leave shell casings after the fire.



What college did you attend, what year did you graduate?



I was educated at the University of Florida. I entered a military sponsored program in 2029 and graduated between 2033 - 34. No, it was not very similar.



You see a time machine. I see a weapons system.



Yes I suppose that is one thing you could do with it. I could also cut my hand off with a power saw or heat up a crowd of people with a microwave. However, I believe Teller already came up with an X-ray laser that destroys itself after going off.



X-rays will be emitted if matter is pumped into the device.



Actually, I thought we were focusing on the degree of radiation and temperature. I don't believe I ever said it didn't give off radiation. Yes, the device does give off x-rays.



The drawing indicates in Detail #5 "X-Ray Venting Zone". It details x-rays being focused and vented directionally. It has applications as a weapons system.



As you said, it's interesting that I see a time machine and you see a weapon. Maybe it's a sign of the "times". However, it is a good point. If the Chinese or Russians thought you had one of these what do you think they would do?



Again, maybe you should ask yourself if you're sure you want me to prove I'm a time traveler. Maybe that's what makes a time traveler "evil" in that he would be willing to share everything with you.



A while ago (on one of the posts), I related an experience I had with my parents while we were driving down a highway. Every now and then, we would pass someone who was in obvious distress with their vehicle. I was amazed that so many people could pass them by without stopping to help. Their explanation was fear. The risk of helping someone was too great and with today's technology, they probably had a cell phone anyway. If they didn't, the walk to a gas station would be good for them and teach them a lesson for running out of gas.



The other example is the plight of the homeless. When you pass them as individuals on the street I see the way people selectively choose an alternate path to avoid them.



Those two examples best define why time travelers do not show themselves. In trying to help you, we put ourselves as great risk and there's really no point to it. We know the nature of time dictates that traveling between "exact" worldlines is impossible. Therefore, the only results we will see will be the ones we stay to see. Since worldlines, outcomes and events are infinite, we have better things to do. When I arrive in the "new" 1998 worldline on my way home I could easily start all of this again and continue to go through the same conversations with all of the same people. However, I already know you won't pay any attention or believe me because we've already been through it on this worldline. Besides, I think the walk to the gas station will do you some good.



The following are the last questions I saw before my "going home" post. I apologize for not being able to get to all of them.



One last question, how did Texas fare during the war?



Texas is still there but Spanish is a lot more popular.



What would prevent us, the enemy state, from returning the machine to 2036 with a suitcase nuclear device?



This is the second time I've seen a reference to the unit as a weapon. I would submit that the people of this worldline have nothing to fear from me. What would you do with the unit?



In your opinion, what is the smallest mass that can form a singularity? Even Hawking suggested primordial singularities were created at the Big Bang. Were there planets (or half planets) around to form them then?



Based on your ability to draw conclusions about someone's profile from their typed words I find it hard to believe you would make such errors in the syntax and meaning of the exact same words. Unfortunately, you have now maneuvered yourself into a position where I have the last word and our debate has come to an end. Boomer isn't a bad name and I sort of like it. Thanks.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I must say I was scared and bought into this. But then my friend showed me something that kinda proves that this guy was a liar. Apparently he stole this idea from a board game. But if more if starts coming true im gonna arm myself.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

time travel is not possible because time itself doesn't exist. time exists only in our minds, it is not an entity that can be "traveled".


our minds understand time as a means to separate what has already occured and what will or can occur.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

i never understood this, maybe im a moron but.. we'll see.


time is just a word we made up to put a label on the events that already occured, what will or can occur. so time, obviously does exist. time is not a figment of our imagination because if everything was just sitting still and not moving forward i wouldn't be a 21 year old alcoholic. people would not grow old and die.



am i making any sense?

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Originally posted by DripOfAWish@Nov 13 2004, 07:41 PM

time travel is not possible because time itself doesn't exist. time exists only in our minds, it is not an entity that can be "traveled".


Although I believe the thought of time-travel is preposterous, I wouldn't rule it out and say it's impossible. Perhaps it's so far ahead of our time that modern technology can't even begin to conceive of such a function even on experimental levels.


I'll also have to disagree with you about "time". Einstein did theorize that time and space are interconnected. And evidence has supported this. Therefore time itself is not simply in our "minds", but actually a physical entity. It just doesn't seem "physical" because our minds cannot directly perceive such an entity since time itself extends beyond the third dimension (space), while the human brain can only cohesively discern what exists in the third dimension and below. The fourth dimension and above is merely theorized yet supported by some physical evidence.


It's all confusing yet fascinating.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

i thought all i had to do was make a machine that can travel faster than the speed of light and jump in a worm hole/black hole. well not in such an easy way of course. can anyone explain the difference between worm holes and black holes? isn't a worm hole opened at both ends thus it being possible to travel through, in some theories? or am i way off?

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

i think worm holes are "known" in theory, but no real proof supports it. black holes however do exist (as evidence suggests), but they're not really "holes" so you can't travel through them. it's really giant clumps of matter that appear to look like black "holes" in outer space because the gravitational pull is so strong that even light cannot escape it.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

John Titor's website's design is terrible, but we'll skip that. I read about 75% of that and if what he has claimed will happen has then....People automatically rule out time travle before ven taking a step back to think about it. Since noone in our time has yet to experince time travel, of course people will not take it seriously, and pass it off as bullshit. Time travel is something we cannot comprehend, therefore we have no reason to believe it (religion would be an exception here). If you were to travel back in time, what do you expect people would think of you then? Time travel? Feh. It just does not seem practical to us. Put that in context, and I'm sure people in the 1800s would not think that we would have computers.


I ponder frequently and find quite fascinating the idea of evolution, "outerspace," time travel, stopping time etc.


On that Civil War note. It is not too far out there to think that there are people getting ready to form and take part in a revolution. Bush, for a second term, "I'd rather kill myself.(No disrespect mean towards that cat Veal who commited suicidide at the site of the World Trade Centers, RIP.)" If you put it all into persepctive, I think that it is totally possible that this dude has some true shit to say, should possibly be taken seriously.


On the other hand though, what the fuck is he talking about?




Edit: Anyone familiar with the Annunaki theory here?

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

the only "time travel" thats possible is not what he said. if we did get a hold of a space-time continium wormhole, we could possibly travel to tons of paralell universes, but not back into our own. like one of the few smart people on 12oz (LOL JK LOL LMAO LOL) said, time is not an entity that can be travelled in.



..or im just saying all this because im scared that half of the world will be blown away in a nuclear holocaust.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Originally posted by Issac Brock@Nov 15 2004, 07:56 PM

the only "time travel" thats possible is not what he said. if we did get a hold of a space-time continium wormhole, we could possibly travel to tons of paralell universes, but not back into our own. like one of the few smart people on 12oz (LOL JK LOL LMAO LOL) said, time is not an entity that can be travelled in.



..or im just saying all this because im scared that half of the world will be blown away in a nuclear holocaust.



i don't really know enough about this... i used to be really interested in the idea of time travel but never actually learned anything about it..but anyways, i agree it is possible or i think it could happen we could go to other universes. but not back into our own as you said. i just don't know or understand such theories... how can you be in a time period that hasn't happened yet.. is it in a different universe? how would you be able to have humans in a future time, while we are in present, which i guess they'd consider past... fuck i don't get it. the more i try the less i'm grasping...

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

How Time Travel Will Work

by Kevin Bonsor


There may be no other concept that captures the imagination more than the idea of time travel -- the ability to travel to any point in the past or future. What could be cooler? You could jump into your time machine to go back and see major events in history and talk to the people who were there! Who would you travel back to see? Julius Caesar? Leonardo da Vinci? Elvis? You could go back and meet yourself at an earlier age, go forward and see how you look in the future... It's these possibilities that have made time travel the subject of so many science fiction books and movies.


It turns out that, in some sense, we are all time travelers. As you sit at your desk, doing nothing more than clicking your mouse, time is traveling around you. The future is constantly being transformed into the past with the present only lasting for a fleeting moment. Everything that you are doing right now is quickly moving into the past, which means we continue to move through time.


Ideas of time travel have existed for centuries, but when Albert Einstein released his theory of special relativity, he laid the foundation for the theoretical possibility of time travel. As we all know, no one has successfully demonstrated time travel, but no one has been able to rule it out either.


In this edition of How Stuff Will Work, we will learn about the concept of time and the different theories surrounding the viability of time travel.


Understanding Time

Astronomer Carl Sagan had it right when he said that time is "resistant to simple definition." Lots of us think we know what time is, but it is hard to define. You can not literally see or touch time, but you can see its effects. The evidence that we are moving through time is found in everything -- our bodies age, buildings weather and crumble, trees grow. Most of us feel the pressure of time as we are pushed to meet deadlines and make appointments. Our lives are often dictated by what time we need to be somewhere.


Ask most people to define time and they are likely to look at their watch or a clock. We see time as the ticking of the hands on these devices. We know that there are 60 seconds in a minute, 60 minutes in an hour, 24 hours in a day and 365 days in a year. These are the basic numbers of time that we all learned in grade school.


Time is also defined as being the fourth dimension of our universe. The other three dimensions are of space, including up-down, left-right and backward-forward. Time cannot exist without space, and likewise, space cannot exist without time. This interconnected relationship of time and space is called the spacetime continuum, which means that any event that occurs in the universe has to involve both space and time.


According to Einstein's theory of special relativity, time slows as an object approaches the speed of light. This leads many scientists to believe that traveling faster than the speed of light could open up the possibility of time travel to the past as well as to the future. The problem is that the speed of light is believed to be the highest speed at which something can travel, so it is unlikely that we will be able to travel into the past. As an object nears the speed of light, its relativistic mass increases until, at the speed of light, it becomes infinite. Accelerating an infinite mass any faster than that is impossible, or at least it seems to be right now.


But time travel in the other direction is not as difficult, and the future may one day be a possible destination...


Space Phenomena

While writers have produced some great ideas for time machines over the years, a real-life time machine has yet to be built. Most theories of time travel don't rely on machines at all. Instead, time travel will likely be done by way of natural phenomena that will transport us instantly from one point in time to another. These space phenomena, which we are not even sure exist, include:


* Rotating black holes

* Wormholes

* Cosmic strings


We'll take a look at each of these in the following sections.


Black Holes


Photo courtesy NASA

When stars that are more than four times the mass of our sun reach the end of their life and have burned up all of their fuel, they collapse under the pressure of their own weight. This implosion creates "black holes," which have gravitational fields so strong that even light cannot escape. Anything that comes in contact with a black hole's event horizon will be sucked in. The event horizon is the boundary of a black hole at which nothing can escape.


You can think of the shape of a black hole as similar to an ice cream cone. It is large on top and tapers into a point, called a singularity. At the singularity, the laws of physics cease to exist and all matter is crushed beyond recognition. This kind of non-rotating black hole is called a Schwarzschild black hole, named after the German astronomer Karl Schwarzschild.


Another type of black hole, called a Kerr hole, is also theoretically possible. Kerr holes are rotating black holes that could be used as portals for time travel or travel to parallel universes. In 1963, New Zealand mathematician Roy Kerr proposed the first realistic theory for a rotating black hole. In his theory, dying stars would collapse into a rotating ring of neutrons that would produce sufficient centrifugal force to prevent the formation of a singularity. Since the black hole would not have a singularity, Kerr believed it would be safe to enter it without being crushed by the infinite gravitational force at its center.


If Kerr holes do exist, it might be possible to pass through them and exit out of a "white" hole. A white hole would have the reverse action of a black hole. So, instead of pulling everything into its gravitational force, it would use some sort of exotic matter with negative energy to push everything out and away from it. These white holes would be our way to enter other times or other worlds.


Given the little we know about black holes, Kerr holes may possibly exist. However, physicist Kip Thorne of the California Institute of Technology believes that the laws of physics prevent such a formation. He says there is no such way to enter and exit a black hole, and that anything attempting to enter a black hole will be sucked in and destroyed before it even reaches the singularity.



Thorne believes there could be another type of tunnel-like structure existing in the universe that could be used for a time travel portal. Wormholes, also called Einstein-Rosen Bridges, are considered to have the most potential for time travel if they do exist. Not only could they allow us to travel through time, they could allow us to travel many light-years from Earth in only a fraction of the amount of time that it would take us with conventional space travel methods.


Wormholes are considered possible based on Einstein's theory of relativity, which states that any mass curves spacetime. To understand this curvature, think about two people holding a bed sheet up and stretching that sheet tight. If one person were to place a baseball on the bed sheet, the weight of the baseball would roll to the middle of the sheet and cause the sheet to curve at that point. Now, if a marble were placed on the edge of the same bed sheet it would travel toward the baseball because of the curve.


Imagining space as a curved, two-dimensional plane, wormholes like this could be formed by two masses applying enough force on spacetime to create a tunnel connecting distant points in the universe.


In this example, space is depicted as a two-dimensional plane rather than the four dimensions that actually make up spacetime. Imagine that this sheet is folded over, leaving a space between the top and bottom. Placing the baseball on the top side will cause a curvature to form. If an equal mass were placed on the bottom part of the sheet at a point that corresponds with the location of the baseball on the top, the second mass would eventually meet with the baseball. This is similar to how wormholes might form.


In space, masses that place pressure on different parts of the universe could eventually come together to form a tunnel -- this is a wormhole. We could then travel from Earth to another galaxy and back relatively quickly (within a lifetime). For instance, let's picture a scenario in which we would want to travel to Sirius, a star that's seen in the Canis Major constellation just below Orion. Sirius is about 9 light-years from Earth, which is about 54 trillion miles (90 trillion km). Obviously, this distance would be far too great for space travelers to traverse and return in time to tell us about what they saw there. So far, the farthest people have traveled into space is to the moon, which is only about 248,548 miles (about 400,000 km) away from Earth. If we could find a wormhole that connected us to the space around Sirius, then we could cut the time considerably by avoiding the trillions of miles that we would have to cross with traditional space travel.


So how does all of this relate to time travel? As we discussed earlier, the theory of relativity states that as the velocity of an object nears the speed of light, time slows down. Scientists have discovered that even at the speeds of the space shuttle, astronauts can travel a few nanoseconds into the future. To understand this, picture two people, person A and person B. Person A stays on Earth, while person B takes off in a spacecraft. At takeoff, their watches are in perfect sync. The closer person B's spacecraft travels to the speed of light, the slower time will pass for person B (relative to person A). If person B travels for just a few hours at 50 percent the speed of light and returns to Earth, it will be obvious to both people that person A has aged much faster than person B. This difference in aging is because time passed much faster for person A than person B, who was traveling closer to the speed of light. Many years might have passed for person A, while person B experienced a time lapse of just a few hours. Find out more about this twin paradox in How Special Relativity Works.


If wormholes could be discovered, it might allow us to travel to the past as well as the future. Here's how it would work: Let's say the mouth of the wormhole is portable. Then person B in the example above, who traveled at 50 percent of light speed into space for a few hours, could carry one wormhole mouth into space, while the mouth at the opposite end of the wormhole would stay with person A on Earth. The two people would continue to see one another as person B traveled into space. When person B returned to Earth a few hours later, a few years may have passed for person A. Now, when person A looks through the wormhole that traveled into space, that person will see him or herself at a younger age, the age he or she was when person B launched into space. The cool thing about it is that the older person A would be able to step into the past by entering the wormhole, while the younger person B could step into the future.


Cosmic Strings

Yet another theory for how we might travel back and forth through time uses the idea of cosmic strings, proposed by Princeton physicist J. Richard Gott in 1991. These are -- as their name suggests -- string-like objects that some scientists believe were formed in the early universe. These strings may line the entire length of the universe and are under immense pressure -- millions upon millions of tons.


These cosmic strings, which are thinner than an atom, would generate an enormous amount of gravitational pull on any objects that pass near them. Objects attached to a cosmic string could travel at incredible speeds, and because their gravitational force distorts spacetime, they could be used for time travel. By pulling two cosmic strings close together, or one string close to a black hole, it might be possible to warp spacetime enough to create closed time-like curves.


A spacecraft could be turned into a time machine by using the gravity produced by the two cosmic strings, or the string and black hole, to propel itself into the past. To do this, it would loop around the cosmic strings. However, there is still much speculation as to whether these strings exist, and if they do, in what form. Gott himself said that in order to travel back in time even one year, it would take a loop of string that contained half the mass-energy of an entire galaxy. And, as with any time machine, you couldn't go back farther than the point at which the time machine was created.


Problems with Time Travel

If we are ever able to develop a workable theory for time travel, we would open up the ability to create very complicated problems called paradoxes. A paradox is defined as something that contradicts itself. Here are two common examples:


* Let's say, for the sake of argument, that you could travel back to a time before you were born. The mere fact that you could exist in a time before you were born creates a paradox. If you were born in 1960, how could you exist in 1955?


* Possibly the most famous paradox is the grandfather paradox. What would happen if a time traveler went back and killed one of his or her ancestors before the traveler was born? If the person killed his or her grandfather, then how could that person be alive to go back and kill his or her grandfather? If we could change the past, it would create an infinite number of paradoxes.


Another theory regarding time travel brings up the idea of parallel universes, or alternative histories. Let's say that you do travel back to meet your grandfather when he was a boy. In the theory of parallel universes, you may have traveled to another universe, one that is similar to ours, but has a different succession of events. For instance, if you were to travel back in time and kill one of your ancestors, you've only killed that person in one universe, which is no longer the universe that you exist in. And if you then try to travel back to your own time, you may end up in another parallel universe and never be able to get back to the universe you started in.


The idea here is that every action causes the creation of a new universe, and that there are an infinite number of universes that exist. When you killed your ancestor, you created a new universe, a universe that was identical to your own up until the time you changed the original succession of events.


Confused yet? Welcome to the world of time travel. Just imagine how complicated the ticket prices will be.




how time works

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Originally posted by casekonly@Nov 16 2004, 05:50 AM

How Time Travel Will Work

by Kevin Bonsor



how time works



Time is also defined as being the fourth dimension of our universe. The other three dimensions are of space, including up-down, left-right and backward-forward. Time cannot exist without space, and likewise, space cannot exist without time. This interconnected relationship of time and space is called the spacetime continuum, which means that any event that occurs in the universe has to involve both space and time.


i always forget time is defined/considered by some the fourth dimension. interesting article... the listed paradoxes were really great... the grandfather theory... im not sure how i feel about those cosmic string theories to use time travel, my best bet is still on a worm hole... but i think i remember once reading(maybe it was in this artice and i just missed it) that it would be so risky to go through one... you'd have no idea where the worm hole would let you out and you wouldn't be prepared etc... hmmm

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

so what happened to his former self when he came back, like the 3 year old, and his parents,

did he talk to himself in this reality, which would be a 3 year old kid, like on southpark with cartman

If he left, why didn't anyone document his leaving, in his machine, is his machine gone too,

even so i think this is the work of a lot of people with a lot of time on their hands, and perhaps with the aid of drugs,

this is eerie, but bullshit,

I was in the middle of a sketch when i saw this, made it hard to get back to it

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Originally posted by DripOfAWish@Nov 14 2004, 02:41 AM

time travel is not possible because time itself doesn't exist. time exists only in our minds, it is not an entity that can be "traveled".


our minds understand time as a means to separate what has already occured and what will or can occur.


wow please do ur self a favor an pic up an 9th grade physics book ok could u do that in this time period becusae thats somthing u could doo or could occur?... any ways open this physics book an start to read ab the speed of light soon after that youll udnerstand time travel

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Register for a 12ozProphet forum account or sign in to comment

You need to be a forum member in order to comment. Forum accounts are separate from shop accounts.

Create an account

Register to become a 12ozProphet forum member.

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now