Jump to content

OK, this just fucking ruled my face into oblivion.


Guest imported_El Mamerro

Recommended Posts

This forum is supported by the 12ozProphet Shop, so go buy a shirt and help support!
This forum is brought to you by the 12ozProphet Shop.
This forum is brought to you by the 12oz Shop.
  • Replies 86
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest imported_El Mamerro
Originally posted by CinchedWaist

i'm going through a potent android phase right now.

 

 

I am the man for all your android needs. At your service.

 

And yeah, I've probably watched the clip over 60 times now. It's insane.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest WebsterUno

*believe*

 

http://www.r50rd.co.uk/research/internal/v2i/engin/photos.html'>

 

i posted that i robot thing on here once.

im trying to find this robotech one my friend

showed me a while back. i think it was

skull leader flying through a street, and

then into an alley. it was dope...

 

here is the transforming beetle

 

http://home.comcast.net/~msmith1015/Frames.htm

 

http://home.comcast.net/~msmith1015/images/DesktopImage2.jpg'>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so why would a robot have a normal gun strapped to his back?

 

no fingertip lazers?

no crotch cannons?

 

take some mooney from the renderfarm and stick it in R&D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest imported_El Mamerro

^Nah, it's a much better idea to have the robot use standardized guns, and instead develop a good dactyllic motion system that can be used for many other things. The more general the core design, the easier and cheaper to add modules for specialization. C'mon, you've heard of Ford...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ford Prefect maybe....

 

how about this....

 

if robots use normal guns then there's a chance people can take the gun and use it.

if it's a lazer that needs the robots internal power to fire,

then if the robot is diasbled then so isthe weapon.

 

yesh... just try to argue that logic.

And dont give me any 'fingerprint recognition' bullshit... robots dont have fingerprints.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest imported_El Mamerro

You don't need fingerprints... a radio frequency/bluetooth signature would do the job. It's already being used for cars.

 

Remove the gun from a small radius surrounding the robot, and it's useless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by El Mamerro

Remove the gun from....

 

gun maybe... bullets? still very usefull.

 

I'm telling you mam.... LAZERS!

 

not just for sharks anymore!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest imported_El Mamerro

Just like the cars with the technology today, the gun goes into a total lockdown. No access to bullets.

 

I'll agree on the crotch cannon at least, because it is plainly necessary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the internal power source required to have lasers wouldn't be such an out of reach idea. I'm sure they have very light weight materials that can hold a charge.... that and the bot could have various means of charging the cells.... even just by walking, like those watches that charge by your movement through kinetic energy (The energy possessed by a body because of its motion, equal to one half the mass of the body times the square of its speed.)

 

The *only* thing that would make me skeptical about such a thing would be.... do we even have lasers that can "fire" and burn something that's far away?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...