RumPuncher Posted October 22, 2003 Share Posted October 22, 2003 Please believe I coped this the Day it came out! I get to the store like 20seconds after they close and I'm tapping on the window. This guy comes to the mail slot and says "what do you want?" 'You guys going to have the Indiana Jones boxed set?' 'We already have it.' 'Can I buy it right now. I'll be quick I swear.' 'Well..... widescreen or fullscreen?' 'Widescreen of course!' 'Ok... come on in.' http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B00003CXC5.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg'> I watched Raiders last night. More to come Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pinup Posted October 22, 2003 Share Posted October 22, 2003 what a fulfulling life you lead ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gunm Posted October 22, 2003 Share Posted October 22, 2003 I wish they still made movies like Raiders with all of the elaborate sets and non-computer generated effects. I mean, the scene where the nazi spys face melts may be corny to the youngsters today but man, that shit freaked me out when i went to see it with my parents in the theater when i was younger. Good adventure movies died when Indie's whip stopped crackin' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 22, 2003 Share Posted October 22, 2003 Originally posted by Pinup what a fulfulling life you lead ;) If you only knew the half. So I was really suprised by Raiders. I mean I watched it tons as a kid but I was shocked to see just how action-packed it was by today's standards. I mean it was wall-to-wall action. As soon as one thing was done, the next big thing was on you. I really think that Raiders was the best action movie of the past 30 years. There's good ones... but the action compliments the storytelling moreso than you'll find today. Even with something like the Matrix, the action can seem a bit gratitous at times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest im not witty Posted October 22, 2003 Share Posted October 22, 2003 indys whip will be cracking sometime soon. (maybe more later than sooner) but eventually. they are working on a 4th installment. please baleeb it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guicho Posted October 22, 2003 Share Posted October 22, 2003 I AGREE KILO7 Originally posted by Kilo7- If you only knew the half. So I was really suprised by Raiders. I mean I watched it tons as a kid but I was shocked to see just how action-packed it was by today's standards. I mean it was wall-to-wall action. As soon as one thing was done, the next big thing was on you. I really think that Raiders was the best action movie of the past 30 years. There's good ones... but the action compliments the storytelling moreso than you'll find today. Even with something like the Matrix, the action can seem a bit gratitous at times. dITTO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weapon X Posted October 22, 2003 Share Posted October 22, 2003 Sick! I wanna get that so badly! Man, I haven’t seen Temple since I was nine or so. “Kali Ma, shouckthi dow!” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weapon X Posted October 22, 2003 Share Posted October 22, 2003 I heard about 4 coming out. Sean Connery is supposed to be in it. Spielberg and Lucas will again collaborate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest WebsterUno Posted October 22, 2003 Share Posted October 22, 2003 *believe* "Dr. Jones...Dr. Jones!!" :lol: yeah, fuck the Matrix Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest im not witty Posted October 22, 2003 Share Posted October 22, 2003 "no time for love Dr Jones" thats been my away message forever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveAustin Posted October 22, 2003 Share Posted October 22, 2003 dude...you totally jumped the gun on that one...gotta wait for the fourth installment to come out before you get the boxed set. anyone have any dirt on it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest imported_El Mamerro Posted October 22, 2003 Share Posted October 22, 2003 Re: *believe* Originally posted by WebsterUno yeah, fuck the Matrix Easy there, cowboy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caL Posted October 22, 2003 Share Posted October 22, 2003 Harrison Ford Oner :king: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DETO Posted October 22, 2003 Share Posted October 22, 2003 Indiana Jones 4 2005 Release Date: July 1st, 2005 (estimated) (wide) Release Date Note: (10/3/03) There have been conflicting reports (at least one of them originating from Paramount itself) that this film is aiming for either July 1st, 2005 (a Friday) or July 4th, 2005 (a Monday). The 1st seems more likely, but there have been rare cases in the past when movies were released on the 4th even though it fell on an unusual movie release day (Die Hard 2: Die Harder was the most-profile one; it was released on a Tuesday). Batman: Intimidation is also aiming for that weekend, and it is equally unclear as to whether WB intends to release it on Friday the 1st or Monday the 4th. My hunch is that it is the 1st in both cases; but my more relevant hunch is that ultimately, one of these movies will flinch. I think it's unlikely both movies would open against each other. Title Note: As with the 2nd and 3rd films (and the first has now been retroactively retitled), this film will be something like Indiana Jones and the... [something]. It's the "something" that isn't currently known. Distributor: Paramount Pictures Producer Note: George Lucas has been part of the Indy process for all three of the previous films, and would surely need/want to be part of the 4th film as well. This is noteworthy, as he's already quite busy with another project: Star Wars. Cast: Harrison Ford (Dr. Henry "Indiana" Jones Jr.), Sean Connery (Dr. H. Jones Sr.), Karen Allen (cameo) (Marion Ravenwood), Kate Capshaw (cameo) (Wilhelmina Scott), John Rhys-Davies (Sallah); Other cast are not yet announced. Cast Notes: (9/21/00) Ford mentioned in a recent interview that he hopes Sean Connery will return for the sequel. (9/26/00) Cinescape landed the scoop this week that Michelle Yeoh has been in talks for a role. (1/27/02) Fox News, talking to Steven Spielberg at the Golden Globes, broke the story that his wife, Kate Capshaw, will be costarring. (6/22/02) Talking to IGN FilmForce this week, Spielberg confirmed that Sean Connery will be returning as Jones, Sr. He'll probably be wearing some "old guy" makeup, since by math, his character will probably be considerably older than the 74 is in real life (when this films). Even if he isn't, Connery might want you to think so, anyway. Ford (60) and Connery (72) are only 12 years apart in age. Without "old guy" makeup, they might appear more like brothers in this film than son and father. The same addressed this week an unsourced rumor/report posted at the IMDb's WENN news service that Callista Flockhart, who has been dating Harrison Ford for a while now, may also have a role (per request from Harrison). This is the first I've heard of it; let's see if any other mainstream news source picks this up or, better yet, confirms it. (6/25/02) I guess we can get used to hearing what sound like ca-razy casting scoops, because the latest rumor sent to AICN claims famous son Colin Hanks might also have a role. Here's a guess... maybe he plays Henry Jones III, and Callista Flockhart plays his girlfriend (though given the Ford/Flockhart age difference she could just as easily play his sister... :). Just guesses, just guesses, folks. (6/27/02) HarrisonFordWeb.com reports that Ford was asked by "Access Hollywood" this week about the Flockhart rumor, and he flatly denied it. Gosh, it sure would help if the IMDB's WENN news service would credit their sources, because it's so difficult to verify stories from them. (7/25/02) Ford told "Chicago Sun-Times" columnist Cindy Pearlman that there are definitely no plans for Indy to have a son. He didn't, however, say that Indy doesn't have a daughter (not that he does; I just noticed the gender specificity). (6/19/03) This will be the fourth film (obviously :) Harrison Ford has starred in for director Steven Spielberg. The only actor that's appeared in more of Spielberg's movies (other than his own cameos) is stuntman/extra Ted Grossman, who's been in five (he played one of Indy's porters in the opening Peruvian sequence of Raiders of the Lost Ark, for example). Director: Steven Spielberg (Saving Private Ryan, Jaws, Jurassic Park, Minority Report, Catch Me If You Can, many other popular favorites; next up before this is Terminal) Director Notes: (2/10/03) "Variety" reports that Stephen Spielberg is planning on directing pal Tom Hanks again in a film called "Terminal" (preview page coming soon). Although it would be quite possible for Spielberg to finish that film long before the estimated May, 2004 production start date for this Indiana Jones movie, the article mentions that there is a possibility that Spielberg *could* decide to bump up filming to sometime in 2003 instead. If he does... we will definitely hear more soon, I'd suspect. My hunch, though, is that filming will remain scheduled for May, 2004. Screenwriter: Frank Darabont ('The Green Mile,' 'The Shawshank Redemption'; also wrote several episodes of the "The Adventures of Young Indiana Jones" TV series; next up before this are Collateral and Fahrenheit 451) Screenwriter Notes: 6/03/02 - Before Frank Darabont signed on, other writers that were approached about the job were M. Night Shyamalan ("The Sixth Sense") and Tom Stoppard ("Empire of the Sun", "Enigma"). Based Upon: This is, of course, the 4th in the world-famous Indiana Jones series. The third film was 1989's Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade. Indiana Jones, is of course, an archaelogist who has amazing, roller-coaster-ride adventures, usually in the 1930's, but this 4th film, released over 12 years after the last, may be set as far in the future as the 1950's or 1960's when Indy is about the age that Harrison Ford is now. (6/3/02) My guess on the setting has been confirmed. Also, the specific "source" for Darabont's script is a story idea by George Lucas, which has been approved by both Harrison Ford and Steven Spielberg. Premise: This isn't known, to the slightest degree. Check out the Reality Check site linked below... there you can read about ELEVEN possiblities that have been either reported or rumored in recent years. Yikes. With Harrison Ford saying he's waiting for a script everyone likes, it's very likely that the script that eventually gets made may not be one of those 11 at all (or maybe it will be... hard to tell). Anyway, 11 different stories is just too much for me to get into, so I refer you to Indyfan.com for now. (6/3/02) Not much is known yet about the story that Frank Darabont is working on, except that it is set in the 1950's. Genre: Action, Eye Candy, Historical, Sequel, Supernatural Filming: Production is scheduled to start in the summer of 2004. Filming Notes: (4/22/02) Michael Fleming of Variety reports that Lucas and crew hope to start filming sometime in 2004... but that's far from confirmed until there's a script everyone likes. (6/3/02) Talking to Cinescape, Steven Spielberg said the target is to start filming in April or May of 2004 to make the early July, 2005 release. (12/17/02) Filming may now be scheduled to start a little later in 2004 than May. (2/10/03) With Steven Spielberg also committed to direct a movie called "Terminal" (preview page coming soon) in the fall of 2003, it's possible the production start date of this film will be changed to accomodate it. (4/15/03) Production is still scheduled to start in 2004. Unofficial Actor Fan Site: HarrisonFordWeb.com Unofficial Series Fan Site: IndyFan.com (This site is pretty comprehensive, frequently updated, and worth watching. Here's also a link directly to their Reality Check section about this project). (6/1/00) Another fansite is theraider.net. Official Site: indianajones.com Official Site Note: (3/13/00) Nothing there yet about this new film, but you can certainly find things about the first three, as well as the Young Indiana Jones series of telefilms now out on video. It's interesting to note that they've numbered the series so Last Crusade is #25, which would make this film #26. (6/15/03) There's still nothing there about this movie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 22, 2003 Share Posted October 22, 2003 jumped the gun? Raiders was made in 1981, Temple in 1984 and Crusade in 1989. There's no way those digital wankers (Lucas and Speilberg) are going to make another raw action movie like they did back then. And two words for the people who honestly think they can add to the trillogy.... Star Wars yeah! IMDB's Indiana 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TuffKid Posted October 22, 2003 Share Posted October 22, 2003 i must and will cop a set... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest imported_Europe Posted October 22, 2003 Share Posted October 22, 2003 One of the best movie trilogies ever... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveAustin Posted October 22, 2003 Share Posted October 22, 2003 Actually Kilo...I agree with you. For some reason I have a huge fear that the next installment will suck as much as the Star Wars prequels have. I'm planning on getting the Matrix boxed set. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest WebsterUno Posted October 22, 2003 Share Posted October 22, 2003 Re: Re: *believe* Originally posted by El Mamerro Easy there, cowboy. heh heh... :crazy: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 22, 2003 Share Posted October 22, 2003 Originally posted by Europe One of the best movie trilogies ever... yep... along side Porky's and Ski School! has anyone else seen the SouthPark where the kids try to steal the print to Raiders so that Speilberg wont fuck it up when he rereleases it? Shit's hitting too close to home. I mean he puts fucking Ewoks in the Opening Jungle scene! anyone else see it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest WebsterUno Posted October 22, 2003 Share Posted October 22, 2003 Originally posted by SteveAustin I'm planning on getting the Matrix boxed set. Lord of the Rings...box set. :cool: possibly 11hours+ of dorkdom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 22, 2003 Share Posted October 22, 2003 you know what bugs me.... there's a dvd set of this.... http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B000056BSE.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg'> but where's the third one? I mean you dont put 2 pieces of a trillogy together a flake on the last chapter! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
king kong Posted October 22, 2003 Share Posted October 22, 2003 http://isis.csuhayward.edu/cesmith/incas/indy.jpg'> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveAustin Posted October 22, 2003 Share Posted October 22, 2003 Originally posted by WebsterUno Lord of the Rings...box set. :cool: possibly 11hours+ of dorkdom oh hell yeah! who wants to meet me in Colorado Springs to watch the first two installments followed by newly released final installment on Dec. 16th...a full day early? I've already got the boxed set of books. p r e c i o u s .... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the_gooch Posted October 23, 2003 Share Posted October 23, 2003 Originally posted by WebsterUno Lord of the Rings...box set. :cool: possibly 11hours+ of dorkdom oh yeah! they are re releasing the fellowship and the 2 towers in december in theaters but both versions will be the extendend ones. fellowship has over 30 min of new footage, and the 2 towers will have 40. i need to buy them! but the raiders boxed is essential! yeah, they last movies to be slightly close to them in action, quality, etc. definitly has to be the LOTR trilogy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
type R Posted October 23, 2003 Share Posted October 23, 2003 always gets the ladies...kills me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abracadabra Posted October 23, 2003 Share Posted October 23, 2003 i've got the goonies on dvd so suck a fart dork faces Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seeking Posted October 23, 2003 Share Posted October 23, 2003 i havent copped it yet, but ive been stoked as shit ever since the day it came out. soon it will be mine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoink Posted October 23, 2003 Share Posted October 23, 2003 for real, I need to go get this, Im just worried its goin to probably be 40 bucks or something, its still worth it probably, its hard to beat the Indy trilogy in terms of just pure movie enjoyment. How much did you but it for? And yeah That south park was fucking great, did you see the special on southpark where they said that episode was one of the only ones they got like a serious kinda mad letter from spielberg to them? kinda like praising them but at the same time shaming them? good stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ferris Bueller Posted October 23, 2003 Share Posted October 23, 2003 It's just about $40, in that ballpark. We got it at the store I work at, please believe I'll be getting an employee discount on that shit. Those are some of the best movies I've ever seen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.